As usual, if you wanted to be a real help you could, but you would rather be
a smartass than helpful.
"°Mike°" <ZHNTPDWBLECA@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3efc7fa9.1980175@no-spam
> Whatever!
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 03:56:12 GMT, in
> <wBvIa.38019$vq.8315@no-spam>
> UKALUM85 scrawled:
>
> >OH Mike. lets see
> >
> >I have www.url1.com, www.url2.com
> >www.url3.com
> >
> >I would like, since the server is not configurable to do it any other
way,
> >to redirect based on the url that the browser is wanting to find (as they
> >are all on the same IP address). It's not that hard to understand and if
it
> >is not clear to you, then I pity the education system you learned in.
> >
> >
> >"°Mike°" <ZHNTPDWBLECA@no-spam> wrote in message
> >news:3f067a2c.18242857@no-spam
> >> Your query makes no sense. That's exactly what a redirect
> >> does; it redirects the page typed in the browser to another one.
> >> Where's the problem with that? Just add the redirect code to
> >> each of your urls' index pages.
>
> <snip>
>
> --
> STGP, OGPE24HSHD
*Me* be a smartass? I don't remember making any smartass
remarks; I don't remember ignoring people's advice; I don't
remember writing:
>It's not that hard to understand and if it is not clear to
>you, then I pity the education system you learned in.
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 19:35:45 GMT, in
<ls2Ja.97566$YZ2.266970@no-spam>
UKALUM85 scrawled:
>As usual, if you wanted to be a real help you could, but you
>would rather be a smartass than helpful.
>
>
>"°Mike°" <ZHNTPDWBLECA@no-spam> wrote in message
>news:3efc7fa9.1980175@no-spam
>> Whatever!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 03:56:12 GMT, in
>> <wBvIa.38019$vq.8315@no-spam>
>> UKALUM85 scrawled:
>>
>> >OH Mike. lets see
>> >
>> >I have www.url1.com, www.url2.com
>> >www.url3.com
>> >
>> >I would like, since the server is not configurable to do it any other
>way,
>> >to redirect based on the url that the browser is wanting to find (as they
>> >are all on the same IP address). It's not that hard to understand and if
>it
>> >is not clear to you, then I pity the education system you learned in.
>> >
>> >
>> >"°Mike°" <ZHNTPDWBLECA@no-spam> wrote in message
>> >news:3f067a2c.18242857@no-spam
>> >> Your query makes no sense. That's exactly what a redirect
>> >> does; it redirects the page typed in the browser to another one.
>> >> Where's the problem with that? Just add the redirect code to
>> >> each of your urls' index pages.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
--
STGP, OGPE24HSHD
Because it was in plain English.
Unless of course you don't speak it or read it then it may be hard to
understand.
> Your query makes no sense. That's exactly what a redirect
> does; it redirects the page typed in the browser to another one.
> Where's the problem with that? Just add the redirect code to
> each of your urls' index pages.
If that had worked I wouldn't have asked the question. Plus after thinking I
need to push something to a different server on a different port on the same
machine.
"°Mike°" <ZHNTPDWBLECA@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3ef8c33c.30297007@no-spam
> *Me* be a smartass? I don't remember making any smartass
> remarks; I don't remember ignoring people's advice; I don't
> remember writing:
>
> >It's not that hard to understand and if it is not clear to
> >you, then I pity the education system you learned in.
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 19:35:45 GMT, in
> <ls2Ja.97566$YZ2.266970@no-spam>
> UKALUM85 scrawled:
>
> >As usual, if you wanted to be a real help you could, but you
> >would rather be a smartass than helpful.
> >
> >
> >"°Mike°" <ZHNTPDWBLECA@no-spam> wrote in message
> >news:3efc7fa9.1980175@no-spam
> >> Whatever!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 03:56:12 GMT, in
> >> <wBvIa.38019$vq.8315@no-spam>
> >> UKALUM85 scrawled:
> >>
> >> >OH Mike. lets see
> >> >
> >> >I have www.url1.com, www.url2.com
> >> >www.url3.com
> >> >
> >> >I would like, since the server is not configurable to do it any other
> >way,
> >> >to redirect based on the url that the browser is wanting to find (as
they
> >> >are all on the same IP address). It's not that hard to understand and
if
> >it
> >> >is not clear to you, then I pity the education system you learned in.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"°Mike°" <ZHNTPDWBLECA@no-spam> wrote in message
> >> >news:3f067a2c.18242857@no-spam
> >> >> Your query makes no sense. That's exactly what a redirect
> >> >> does; it redirects the page typed in the browser to another one.
> >> >> Where's the problem with that? Just add the redirect code to
> >> >> each of your urls' index pages.
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
>
> --
> STGP, OGPE24HSHD
Here is the redirect webpage code I use for redirects:
meta HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" content="2;
url=http://www.bootdisk.com/bootdisk.htm"
the content is the seconds, the url= is the page you want to be
redirected to
goes under head and before /head
left out the < and > tho
--
Bootdisks, PC Support, Essential Utilities
http://www.bootdisk.com/
"Jimchip" <jimchip@no-spam> wrote in message
news:vf9m49801p088@no-spam
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 21:32:45 GMT, UKALUM85 wrote:
> > Because it was in plain English.
>
> You said in another message in this thread (the one °Mike° first replied
> to):
>
> "It's for several non-related sites hosted at the same ip with different
> url's. I want that types in one of the urls to go to the subdirectory for
> that specific site."
>
> You call that 'plain English'?
Yes, because it says everything and should be easy to understand by anyone
with an ounce of comprehension.
That's for a single redirect not what I seem to be wanting.
"Plato" <|@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3ef4dbba$0$34407$45beb828@no-spam
> Here is the redirect webpage code I use for redirects:
>
>
> meta HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" content="2;
> url=http://www.bootdisk.com/bootdisk.htm"
>
> the content is the seconds, the url= is the page you want to be
> redirected to
>
>
> goes under head and before /head
>
>
> left out the < and > tho
>
>
> --
> Bootdisks, PC Support, Essential Utilities
> http://www.bootdisk.com/
Thanks Plato.
Glad there r some sane people left.
--
www.a1poolandleisure.co.uk
"Plato" <|@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3ef4dbba$0$34407$45beb828@no-spam
> Here is the redirect webpage code I use for redirects:
>
>
> meta HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" content="2;
> url=http://www.bootdisk.com/bootdisk.htm"
>
> the content is the seconds, the url= is the page you want to be
> redirected to
>
>
> goes under head and before /head
>
>
> left out the < and > tho
>
>
> --
> Bootdisks, PC Support, Essential Utilities
> http://www.bootdisk.com/
UKALUM85 wrote:
>
> That's for a single redirect not what I seem to be wanting.
The thread is to darn long. And most will not review/revisit past posts.
Perhaps you might want to repost your inquiry.
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:31:15 GMT, UKALUM85 wrote:
>
> "Jimchip" <jimchip@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:vf9m49801p088@no-spam
>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 21:32:45 GMT, UKALUM85 wrote:
>> > Because it was in plain English.
>>
>> You said in another message in this thread (the one °Mike° first replied
>> to):
>>
>> "It's for several non-related sites hosted at the same ip with different
>> url's. I want that types in one of the urls to go to the subdirectory for
>> that specific site."
>>
>> You call that 'plain English'?
>
> Yes, because it says everything and should be easy to understand by anyone
> with an ounce of comprehension.
What the hell does this mean: "I want that types in one of the urls to go to
the subdirectory for that specific site." ?
You can't even comprehend what you write yourself. Claiming it "should be
easy to understand" doesn't make it so.
--
Anyone outside my light-cone is dead to me. That's just a rule I have.
(lifted from /. Posted by jamie.)
"Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing an
intro and listened as UKALUM85 said
> As usual, if you wanted to be a real help you could, but you would
> rather be a smartass than helpful.
You choose (IMHO) the smartest guy on this group to slag off, and in doing
so you cheapen your arguments immediately.
It does not help you to abuse the un-hired help in this way, or in fact, in
any way.
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy
Well the "smartest guy in the group" does not have to be an asshole, it's a
legitimate question and if I hadn't tried most of those methods already, I
still wouldn't be asking it.
Thanks
"He who doth Slump a lot" <me6@no-spam> wrote in message
news:bd4n5p$p0fpc$1@no-spam
> "Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing an
> intro and listened as UKALUM85 said
>
> > As usual, if you wanted to be a real help you could, but you would
> > rather be a smartass than helpful.
>
> You choose (IMHO) the smartest guy on this group to slag off, and in doing
> so you cheapen your arguments immediately.
> It does not help you to abuse the un-hired help in this way, or in fact,
in
> any way.
> --
> slumpy
> no more
> no less
> just slumpy
>
>
"Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing an
intro and listened as UKALUM85 said
> Well the "smartest guy in the group" does not have to be an asshole,
> it's a legitimate question and if I hadn't tried most of those
> methods already, I still wouldn't be asking it.
Firstly I cannot see any instance of Mike being an asshole.
Secondly, if you don't volunteer what methods you have tried, expect people
to assume you haven't tried anything at all.
Plus you didn't ask the original question, which adds to the problem of
following the thread properly.
As was already suggested, I would start a new thread with as much info as
possible.
And give Mike the respect he deserves, and understand that if he is a bit
short with people sometimes, it is because he answers probably 250 posts a
day, free of charge, mostly from people who give insufficient info.
Wouldn't you get a bit pissed off from time to time ?
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy
UKALUM85 rambled on about something in
<ls2Ja.97566$YZ2.266970@no-spam>:
> As usual, if you wanted to be a real help you could, but you would
> rather be a smartass than helpful.
From a disinterested bystander, he didn't post the first insult,
pasted below:
>It's not that hard to understand and if it is not clear to
>you, then I pity the education system you learned in.
He offered, what I thought, was sound advice.
Just my $.02. YMMV
NOI
--
There must be wonderful paintings on the walls of his ass, for his
head to be stuck up there for so long...!
- William Poaster in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
"Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing an
intro and listened as Jimchip said
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 17:25:22 GMT, UKALUM85 wrote:
>> Well the "smartest guy in the group" does not have to be an asshole,
>> it's a legitimate question and if I hadn't tried most of those
>> methods already, I still wouldn't be asking it.
>
> Saying something like "Your query makes no sense" is not being an
> asshole. Calling someone an asshole for that *IS* being one. You
> jumped into a thread, asked a vague question, and never followed up
> with information
> until after denigrating the responder for *your* lack of communication
> skills.
>
> You also say "if I hadn't tried most of those methods already, I still
> wouldn't be asking it". You never detailed what "most of those
> methods" are that you did try, you obviously did not try them all,
> and you never clarified what you are trying to do- What you wrote
> before still doesn't make sense.
>
> Either you are trying to have a simple redirect occur and you did it
> wrong, (even though you claim you tried that already, no one can know
> what you did exactly since you haven't said) or you need to do
> something else that no one can figure out because you have not been
> clear in what, *exactly*, you need and have or have not tried. You
> haven't even mentioned the software running on the 'server' you
> mentioned that you claim can only do things a certain way.
And to add another 2 centsworth....I wasn't even sure if the OP hadn't
changed names and server halfway through the thread...
"This is a hijacking!! Hand over all your information, and nobody gets
hurt."
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy
"Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing an
intro and listened as Thund3rstruck said
> UKALUM85 rambled on about something in
> <6ElJa.72913$sm5.72556@no-spam>:
>
>> Well the "smartest guy in the group" does not have to be an asshole,
>> it's a legitimate question and if I hadn't tried most of those
>> methods already, I still wouldn't be asking it.
>>
>> Thanks
>
> OK. I went back and looked. Nowhere that I have found, yet, have
> you mentioned that the redirect that Mike speaks of, had been tried.
>
He dug a very deep hole for himself with that remark.
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:15:07 +0100, He who doth Slump a lot wrote:
> "Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing an
> intro and listened as Jimchip said
>
>> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 17:25:22 GMT, UKALUM85 wrote:
>>> Well the "smartest guy in the group" does not have to be an asshole,
>>> it's a legitimate question and if I hadn't tried most of those
>>> methods already, I still wouldn't be asking it.
>>
>> Saying something like "Your query makes no sense" is not being an
>> asshole. Calling someone an asshole for that *IS* being one. You
>> jumped into a thread, asked a vague question, and never followed up
>> with information
>> until after denigrating the responder for *your* lack of communication
>> skills.
>>
>> You also say "if I hadn't tried most of those methods already, I still
>> wouldn't be asking it". You never detailed what "most of those
>> methods" are that you did try, you obviously did not try them all,
>> and you never clarified what you are trying to do- What you wrote
>> before still doesn't make sense.
>>
>> Either you are trying to have a simple redirect occur and you did it
>> wrong, (even though you claim you tried that already, no one can know
>> what you did exactly since you haven't said) or you need to do
>> something else that no one can figure out because you have not been
>> clear in what, *exactly*, you need and have or have not tried. You
>> haven't even mentioned the software running on the 'server' you
>> mentioned that you claim can only do things a certain way.
>
> And to add another 2 centsworth....I wasn't even sure if the OP hadn't
> changed names and server halfway through the thread...
I'm offended! I gave at least a two-bit response! :)
> "This is a hijacking!! Hand over all your information, and nobody gets
> hurt."
--
Anyone outside my light-cone is dead to me. That's just a rule I have.
(lifted from /. Posted by jamie.)
"Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing an
intro and listened as Jimchip said
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:15:07 +0100, He who doth Slump a lot wrote:
>> "Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing
>> an intro and listened as Jimchip said
>>
>>> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 17:25:22 GMT, UKALUM85 wrote:
>>>> Well the "smartest guy in the group" does not have to be an
>>>> asshole, it's a legitimate question and if I hadn't tried most of
>>>> those methods already, I still wouldn't be asking it.
>>>
>>> Saying something like "Your query makes no sense" is not being an
>>> asshole. Calling someone an asshole for that *IS* being one. You
>>> jumped into a thread, asked a vague question, and never followed up
>>> with information
>>> until after denigrating the responder for *your* lack of
>>> communication skills.
>>>
>>> You also say "if I hadn't tried most of those methods already, I
>>> still wouldn't be asking it". You never detailed what "most of those
>>> methods" are that you did try, you obviously did not try them all,
>>> and you never clarified what you are trying to do- What you wrote
>>> before still doesn't make sense.
>>>
>>> Either you are trying to have a simple redirect occur and you did it
>>> wrong, (even though you claim you tried that already, no one can
>>> know what you did exactly since you haven't said) or you need to do
>>> something else that no one can figure out because you have not been
>>> clear in what, *exactly*, you need and have or have not tried. You
>>> haven't even mentioned the software running on the 'server' you
>>> mentioned that you claim can only do things a certain way.
>>
>> And to add another 2 centsworth....I wasn't even sure if the OP
>> hadn't changed names and server halfway through the thread...
>
> I'm offended! I gave at least a two-bit response! :)
So this thread is now worth 2 bits (whatever that is) and 4 cents :-)
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 17:57:53 +0100, in
<bd4n5p$p0fpc$1@no-spam>
He who doth Slump a lot scrawled:
>"Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing an
>intro and listened as UKALUM85 said
>
>> As usual, if you wanted to be a real help you could, but you would
>> rather be a smartass than helpful.
>
>You choose (IMHO) the smartest guy on this group to slag off,
YIKES! Don't say things like that!
--
"What if I'm a figment of MY imagination?"
"So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
threw back my head and roared with laughter as °Mike° continued:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 17:57:53 +0100, in
> <bd4n5p$p0fpc$1@no-spam>
> He who doth Slump a lot scrawled:
>
>> "Quit the smart-ass comments" they said, so I forgot all about doing
>> an intro and listened as UKALUM85 said
>>
>>> As usual, if you wanted to be a real help you could, but you would
>>> rather be a smartass than helpful.
>>
>> You choose (IMHO) the smartest guy on this group to slag off,
>
> YIKES! Don't say things like that!
> "What if I'm a figment of MY imagination?"
Then I have a few problems myself ;-)
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy
Howdy!
"UKALUM85" <kjharl@no-spam> wrote in message
news:6ElJa.72913$sm5.72556@no-spam
> Well the "smartest guy in the group" does not have to be an asshole, it's
a
> legitimate question and if I hadn't tried most of those methods already, I
> still wouldn't be asking it.
Then you need some fancy javascript or ASP code running.
I still don't understand - don't you use the HEADERS directive to
figure out which site on the IP is being looked at? If not, then of course
you've got fits.
RwP