24HOURSUPPORT HELPDESK 23 RE EYEBALLS NEEDED
From: "Kevin" (Kevin@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 21:50:15 +0200


Your too late arsehole: http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_4220.htm But you wait untill the 7th of March 2004 and your dead meat!!
"Kadaitcha Man" <fooq@no-spam> wrote in message news:eb5848efa663ca1741c9b88fe56350f0@no-spam > Kevin wrote:
> > Could n't find rude remarks, the article is fine, even MVP's now know > > the difference between an image and a backup only when they can read,
> > that is.
>
> You visited my site? Shit. I'll have to do a scan for faggot viruses now.
>
> --
> Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
> Anarchy is having to put up with things that piss you off.
>
> Kadaitcha Man: Moderator, 24hoursupport.helpdesk >
>


Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 01:30:28 GMT


From: "Kadaitcha Man" (fooq@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed

Kevin wrote:
> Your too late arsehole: http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_4220.htm > But you wait untill the 7th of March 2004 and your dead meat!!

That looks like a threat.

NNTP-Posting-Host: fia198-101-100.dsl.hccnet.nl X-Trace: news.hccnet.nl 1056225017 28121 80.100.101.198 (21 Jun 2003
19:50:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@no-spam
-- Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
Anarchy is having to put up with things that piss you off.

Kadaitcha Man: Moderator, 24hoursupport.helpdesk

From: "Malvern" (lmalvern@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: 22 Jun 2003 03:24:26 GMT

YEEOOOOOWW !! Glad they aren't mine.

Malv
"Kadaitcha Man" <fooq@no-spam> wrote in message news:375720a78dd75f98b1c5b645cf4561e0@no-spam > Professor Gazwad wrote:
> > Kadaitcha Man asked wistfully...
> >
> > Are these high enough?
>
>
> Bloody hell. Synapse Syndrome will stop at nothing for attention.
>
> --
> Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
> Anarchy is having to put up with things that piss you off.
>
> Kadaitcha Man: Moderator, 24hoursupport.helpdesk >
>


Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 06:35:03 GMT
From: "zarathustra" (zar@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed

Kevin doodled:
> Your
"You're"
HTH
>too late arsehole: http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_4220.htm > But you wait untill the 7th of March 2004 and your dead meat!!

-- 'the real TOMMY Tutalidge' wrote in message news:3EC6C261.7D31BDFA@no-spam - "The people that post in yenc have a pickle shoved up their arse."

'-= Hawk =-' replied in message news:nkhdcv4c8uga0jonl0jpcgr8mt3g6m49na@no-spam - "And the people (like you) who whine about yEnc eat those pickles."

http://www.viz.co.uk/profanisaurus/profanis.htm

From: "Professor Gazwad" (Don't Be So Farking Wetardid)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 10:40:55 +0100

zarathustra asked wistfully...

|| Kevin doodled:
||| Your ||
|| "You're"
|| HTH
No you fuckwit, he was quite correct with the word "your".

Since you're a brain-dead fuckwit you will never know why.

--

Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp Moderator: alt.warez.uk
http://angry.at/gazwad http://gazwad.servebeer.com

From: zarathustra@no-spam (zarathustra)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: 25 Jun 2003 07:24:08 -0700

"Professor Gazwad" <Don't Be So Farking Wetardid> wrote in message news:<3ef579a5$1@no-spam>...

> zarathustra asked wistfully...
> > || Kevin doodled:
> ||| Your > ||
> || "You're"
> || HTH > > No you fuckwit, he was quite correct with the word "your".
> > Since you're a brain-dead fuckwit you will never know why.

No doubt in the same way that your statement "No you fuckwit" was correct...

Silly cunt. (No, that's _not_ a sig.)


From: "Gazwad" (Dont Be So FarKing WeeTarDid)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:58:55 +0100

zarathustra asked wistfully...

|| "Professor Gazwad" <Don't Be So Farking Wetardid> wrote in message || news:<3ef579a5$1@no-spam>...
||| zarathustra asked wistfully...
|||
||||| Kevin doodled:
|||||| Your |||||
||||| "You're"
||||| HTH |||
||| No you fuckwit, he was quite correct with the word "your".
|||
||| Since you're a brain-dead fuckwit you will never know why.
||
|| No doubt in the same way that your statement "No you fuckwit" was || correct...
||
|| Silly cunt. (No, that's _not_ a sig.)

No, you fuckwit. Read it all again. This time whilst awake.

--

Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp Moderator: alt.warez.uk
http://angry.at/gazwad http://gazwad.servebeer.com

From: "Kadaitcha Man" (fooq@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 03:59:51 +1000

zarathustra wrote:
> Silly cunt. (No, that's _not_ a sig.)

You have not earned the right to lame anyone in this group. Please turm your exceedingly short attention span to this unfinished matter:

zarathustra wrote:
> Kadaitcha Man doodled:

>> That's bad luck for you. There are no second prizes. You see, you are >> the one who as claimed to be a fully paid-up 'Word Police Officer',
>> yet you hyphenate compound words that end in ly,
>
> Yes, that did happen. Just goes to show I'm not infallible.

It also goes to show that you are an idiot.

Kadaitcha's Medical Dictionary: An IDIOT is a person without understanding or ordinary mental capacity, one who does not advance beyond the mental age of three years; distinguished from an imbecile, who is capable of some mental and physical education. An IMBECILE is one who is congenitally weak-minded yet not incapable of education; a mental defective not advancing beyond the mental age of seven years. A MORON is a feeble-minded person of higher grade than an imbecile, one who does not advance beyond the mental age of 12 years.

You are an idiot who has not learned that spelling, typo and grammar laming is the refuge of the utterly inadequate. Just in case you're bewlidered by the phrase the utterly inadequate, it is constructed of a noun with a plural verb. You do know what they are, don't you? You must, I mean, after all, you are a fully paid up 'Word Police Officer', aren't you?

> Don't be a silly-billy.
> 'inappropriate'?
> Never...........!
> Oh, mention. Mention!

No.

>> All of that means two things; you >> are a fuckwit lamer; you are an easy mark for anyone with a >> rudimentary knowledge of the English language.
>
> Heh. If I were that gurning fishboi, I'd be squawking 'stalker' right > now. Thank fuck I'm not.

There are a number of issues in that paragraph. Please clarify:

A) "If I were that gurning fishboi,"

Is "that gurning fishboi" in the third person? Or is gurning being used as an adjective? If the latter, you have missed a comma out of the phrase. If the former, there is no contextual reference to support the phrase, hence it is spurious. If neither, then is the word fishboi in the first or second person?

B) "If I were that gurning fishboi, I'd be squawking 'stalker' right now."

Putting aside the issue of your babble being completely unintelligible, as indicated by the need to pose the questions in A) to ascertain context,
meaning and intent, the sentence has two independent clauses, viz "If you]
were that gurning fishboi" and "[you]'d be squawking 'stalker' right now."
The two indpendent clauses are closed by a single concluding statement, viz "Thank fuck I'm not." Which of the two independent clauses is the concluding statement concluding?

>> To save yourself more embarrassment, you should restrict your posts >> to the following:
>
> Embarrassment? This is usenet, you dildo. Who the fuck gets > embarrassed in usenet?
>
> PPfffttt....

Ah, the sweet sounds of a rapidly deflating ego.

--
Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
Anarchy is having to put up with things that piss you off.

Kadaitcha Man: Moderator, 24hoursupport.helpdesk

From: "stellalfcjuzza@no-spam" (brenda.l@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:54:11 +0100

non now watch your language "zarathustra" <zarathustra@no-spam> wrote in message news:346c2221.0306250624.4a19777a@no-spam > "Professor Gazwad" <Don't Be So Farking Wetardid> wrote in message news:<3ef579a5$1@no-spam>...
> > zarathustra asked wistfully...
> >
> > || Kevin doodled:
> > ||| Your > > ||
> > || "You're"
> > || HTH > >
> > No you fuckwit, he was quite correct with the word "your".
> >
> > Since you're a brain-dead fuckwit you will never know why.
>
> No doubt in the same way that your statement "No you fuckwit" was correct...
>
> Silly cunt. (No, that's _not_ a sig.)

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 18/06/2003


From: "relic" (reply.to@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:41:03 GMT

As predicted, zarathustra typed:

> -- > Silly cunt. (No, that's _not_ a sig.)

Sure /looks/ like your sig. Appropriate too.

-- - relic -
Resident Psychic: alt.os.windows-xp The French.... They're there when they need you.


From: zarathustra@no-spam (zarathustra)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: 27 Jun 2003 03:49:33 -0700

"relic" <reply.to@no-spam> wrote in message news:<jqqKa.78851$49.2975002@no-spam>...

> As predicted, zarathustra typed:
> > > -- > > Silly cunt. (No, that's _not_ a sig.)
> > Sure /looks/ like your sig. Appropriate too.

Fuck off back to that dogshit-eating hovel you call alt.os.windows-xp, clique-boi.



From: zarathustra@no-spam (zarathustra)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: 27 Jun 2003 03:54:12 -0700

"Gazwad" <Dont Be So FarKing WeeTarDid> wrote in message news:<3ef9b8a6$1@no-spam>...

> zarathustra asked wistfully...
> > || "Professor Gazwad" <Don't Be So Farking Wetardid> wrote in message > || news:<3ef579a5$1@no-spam>...
> ||| zarathustra asked wistfully...
> |||
> ||||| Kevin doodled:
> |||||| Your > |||||
> ||||| "You're"
> ||||| HTH > |||
> ||| No you fuckwit, he was quite correct with the word "your".
> |||
> ||| Since you're a brain-dead fuckwit you will never know why.
> ||
> || No doubt in the same way that your statement "No you fuckwit" was > || correct...
> ||
> || Silly cunt. (No, that's _not_ a sig.)
> > No, you fuckwit. Read it all again. This time whilst awake.

Looks like you may have been awake this time. You finally decided to punctuate "No, you fuckwit." Are you AOWX twats Russian, by any chance? It's just that you like holding hands & giving each other smackers quite a lot.


Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:56:54 GMT
From: "Kadaitcha Man" (fooq@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed

Please deal with this still outstanding matter, you pathetic,
thread-slinking cunt.

zarathustra wrote:
> Kadaitcha Man doodled:

>> That's bad luck for you. There are no second prizes. You see, you are >> the one who as claimed to be a fully paid-up 'Word Police Officer',
>> yet you hyphenate compound words that end in ly,
>
> Yes, that did happen. Just goes to show I'm not infallible.

It also goes to show that you are an idiot.

Kadaitcha's Medical Dictionary: An IDIOT is a person without understanding or ordinary mental capacity, one who does not advance beyond the mental age of three years; distinguished from an imbecile, who is capable of some mental and physical education. An IMBECILE is one who is congenitally weak-minded yet not incapable of education; a mental defective not advancing beyond the mental age of seven years. A MORON is a feeble-minded person of higher grade than an imbecile, one who does not advance beyond the mental age of 12 years.

You are an idiot who has not learned that spelling, typo and grammar laming is the refuge of the utterly inadequate. Just in case you're bewlidered by the phrase the utterly inadequate, it is constructed of a noun with a plural verb. You do know what they are, don't you? You must, I mean, after all, you are a fully paid up 'Word Police Officer', aren't you?

> Don't be a silly-billy.
> 'inappropriate'?
> Never...........!
> Oh, mention. Mention!

No.

>> All of that means two things; you >> are a fuckwit lamer; you are an easy mark for anyone with a >> rudimentary knowledge of the English language.
>
> Heh. If I were that gurning fishboi, I'd be squawking 'stalker' right > now. Thank fuck I'm not.

There are a number of issues in that paragraph. Please clarify:

A) "If I were that gurning fishboi,"

Is "that gurning fishboi" in the third person? Or is gurning being used as an adjective? If the latter, you have missed a comma out of the phrase. If the former, there is no contextual reference to support the phrase, hence it is spurious. If neither, then is the word fishboi in the first or second person?

B) "If I were that gurning fishboi, I'd be squawking 'stalker' right now."

Putting aside the issue of your babble being completely unintelligible, as indicated by the need to pose the questions in A) to ascertain context,
meaning and intent, the sentence has two independent clauses, viz "If you]
were that gurning fishboi" and "[you]'d be squawking 'stalker' right now."
The two indpendent clauses are closed by a single concluding statement, viz "Thank fuck I'm not." Which of the two independent clauses is the concluding statement concluding?

>> To save yourself more embarrassment, you should restrict your posts >> to the following:
>
> Embarrassment? This is usenet, you dildo. Who the fuck gets > embarrassed in usenet?
>
> PPfffttt....

Ah, the sweet sounds of a rapidly deflating ego.

--
Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
Anarchy is having to put up with things that piss you off.

Kadaitcha Man: Moderator, 24hoursupport.helpdesk

From: "Gazwad" (Dont Be So FarKing WeeTarDid)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:21:53 +0100

zarathustra asked wistfully...

<lames snipped for brevity>

|| Are you AOWX twats Russian, by any || chance?

I have a recent Russian ancestor, probably as recent as one of yours came down from the trees.

|| It's just that you like holding hands & giving each other || smackers quite a lot.

Awww, you're jealous. Kissy,kissy.

--

Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp Moderator: alt.warez.uk
http://angry.at/gazwad http://gazwad.servebeer.com

Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:24:42 GMT
From: "Kadaitcha Man" (fooq@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed

Gazwad wrote:
> zarathustra asked wistfully...
>
> <lames snipped for brevity>
>
>>> Are you AOWX twats Russian, by any >>> chance?
>
> I have a recent Russian ancestor, probably as recent as one of yours > came down from the trees.

That'll make him slink off the thread and ignore you.

>>> It's just that you like holding hands & giving each other >>> smackers quite a lot.
>
> Awww, you're jealous. Kissy,kissy.

... on second thoughts.

-- Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
Anarchy is having to put up with things that piss you off.

Kadaitcha Man: Moderator, 24hoursupport.helpdesk

From: "relic" (reply.to@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:59:43 GMT

As predicted, Josef Knecht typed:
> "relic" <reply.to@no-spam> wrote:
>
>> As predicted, zarathustra typed:
>>> "relic" <reply.to@no-spam> wrote in message >>> news:<jqqKa.78851$49.2975002@no-spam>...
>>>> As predicted, zarathustra typed:
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Silly cunt. (No, that's _not_ a sig.)
>>>>
>>>> Sure /looks/ like your sig. Appropriate too.
>>>
>>> Fuck off back to that dogshit-eating hovel you call >>> alt.os.windows-xp, clique-boi.
>>
>> Awwww... did the "Silly cunt" get her feelings hurt?
>>
>> Read this yet? http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
>
> How the fuck are you managing to deep-throat teh k-trole when,
> apparently, there's no cock involved?

Tell me, do you deep throat? Take it up your arse too? And, just because you do, why do you assume everyone else does?

-- - relic -
Resident Psychic: alt.os.windows-xp