"HomeStation" <unknown@no-spam> wrote in message
news:b2anfvs9679e9mq5tvlrhplviiaevr1e7k@no-spam
> Subject: FS-Truckload Computers,Components,Software
>
> Selling as a lot, a truckload of older computers,printers,
> scanners, expensive programs,etc.Ideal for small dealer,
> flea market operator,etc..
> Will consider trading for quality antiques, gemstones, or something
> similar,interesting.
>
> Asking $2,200.00 cash for all - not interested in small lots.
> Located in capital area.
>
> If interested, reply to ng with a contact email or phone number.
> This is to reduce spamming.
>
sure buddy...... why don't you just call the local police........ see if
they
are interested in your little........ "haul" ?
oh.... and by the way........ your message is not "unknown". Your ip address
is clearly visible in
your details..... I suggest you hit the road before the local police contact
your provider and they
supply them with your address.... talk about an EASY bust! (did I say
stupid!)
"HomeStation" <unknown@no-spam> wrote in message
news:b2anfvs9679e9mq5tvlrhplviiaevr1e7k@no-spam
> Subject: FS-Truckload Computers,Components,Software
>
> Selling as a lot, a truckload of older computers,printers,
> scanners, expensive programs,etc.Ideal for small dealer,
> flea market operator,etc..
> Will consider trading for quality antiques, gemstones, or something
> similar,interesting.
>
> Asking $2,200.00 cash for all - not interested in small lots.
> Located in capital area.
>
> If interested, reply to ng with a contact email or phone number.
> This is to reduce spamming.
>
>
He did say OLDER stuff.
Nelson
"Flaming "C"" <FlamingC@no-spam> wrote in message
news:rmQKa.327354$Vi5.8397008@no-spam
> oh.... and by the way........ your message is not "unknown". Your ip
address
> is clearly visible in
> your details..... I suggest you hit the road before the local police
contact
> your provider and they
> supply them with your address.... talk about an EASY bust! (did I say
> stupid!)
>
> "HomeStation" <unknown@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:b2anfvs9679e9mq5tvlrhplviiaevr1e7k@no-spam
> > Subject: FS-Truckload Computers,Components,Software
> >
> > Selling as a lot, a truckload of older computers,printers,
> > scanners, expensive programs,etc.Ideal for small dealer,
> > flea market operator,etc..
> > Will consider trading for quality antiques, gemstones, or something
> > similar,interesting.
> >
> > Asking $2,200.00 cash for all - not interested in small lots.
> > Located in capital area.
> >
> > If interested, reply to ng with a contact email or phone number.
> > This is to reduce spamming.
> >
> >
>
>
It's just old junk ....anyone can buy their own truckload for $200 at the
Alta Gov't Auction or Yellowhead or Fenskes...They sell crap like that for
$5 a pallet all the time.
"Flaming "C"" <FlamingC@no-spam> wrote in message
news:rmQKa.327354$Vi5.8397008@no-spam
> oh.... and by the way........ your message is not "unknown". Your ip
address
> is clearly visible in
> your details..... I suggest you hit the road before the local police
contact
> your provider and they
> supply them with your address.... talk about an EASY bust! (did I say
> stupid!)
>
> "HomeStation" <unknown@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:b2anfvs9679e9mq5tvlrhplviiaevr1e7k@no-spam
> > Subject: FS-Truckload Computers,Components,Software
> >
> > Selling as a lot, a truckload of older computers,printers,
> > scanners, expensive programs,etc.Ideal for small dealer,
> > flea market operator,etc..
> > Will consider trading for quality antiques, gemstones, or something
> > similar,interesting.
> >
> > Asking $2,200.00 cash for all - not interested in small lots.
> > Located in capital area.
> >
> > If interested, reply to ng with a contact email or phone number.
> > This is to reduce spamming.
> >
> >
>
>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:11:03 GMT, while chained to a desk in the
scriptorium, "Nelson" <nelsonh@no-spam> wrote:
> $He did say OLDER stuff.
Then he should be offereing it free to a good home.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
A Dreamer is One Who Can Only Find Her
Way by Moonlight.
-- Oscar Wilde
Why should he GIVE THEM AWAY FREE?
I never got anything for free, and if it was me, sooner than give for
free, I would invite some friends, and we would have a SMASHING PARTY,
to destroy the items into unusable refuse.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:15:46 -0600, John Fleming <nospam@no-spam>
wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:11:03 GMT, while chained to a desk in the
>scriptorium, "Nelson" <nelsonh@no-spam> wrote:
>
>> $He did say OLDER stuff.
>
>Then he should be offereing it free to a good home.
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 08:14:38 -0600, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium, HolHoHo <unknown@no-spam> wrote:
> $Why should he GIVE THEM AWAY FREE?
> $I never got anything for free, and if it was me, sooner than give for
> $free, I would invite some friends, and we would have a SMASHING PARTY,
> $to destroy the items into unusable refuse.
Itf it were your stuff, that would be your choice.
Fact is, computer hardware dates very rapidly, and anything more
than a few years old has very little, if any, resale value.
Giving older stuff away for free is probably more cost effective
than paying the Eco Station to take them off your hands.
Give them to an educational institution that lets the kids tear
them apart to see how they work might even get you a tax reciept.
> $On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:15:46 -0600, John Fleming <nospam@no-spam>
> $wrote:
> $
> $>On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:11:03 GMT, while chained to a desk in the
> $>scriptorium, "Nelson" <nelsonh@no-spam> wrote:
> $>
> $>> $He did say OLDER stuff.
> $>
> $>Then he should be offereing it free to a good home.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
A Dreamer is One Who Can Only Find Her
Way by Moonlight.
-- Oscar Wilde
> You'd destroy everything rather than give it to charity?
>
Charity says every one pays,even her boy friend
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
Angry_Mime <Moonscape@no-spam> wrote in message
news:MWhLa.13560$ZS3.1716689@no-spam
>
> "HolHoHo" <unknown@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:rj8rfvku6tefbm7nh6l9q8v8i82pthpljb@no-spam
> > Why should he GIVE THEM AWAY FREE?
> > I never got anything for free, and if it was me, sooner than give for
> > free, I would invite some friends, and we would have a SMASHING PARTY,
> > to destroy the items into unusable refuse.
>
> You'd destroy everything rather than give it to charity?
>
>
>
>
In Edmonton there seem to be more el cheapo SOB's, than actual cash
buyers, for just about anything!!
Constant carping from non-buyers, either because they have no money,
or else spend on illicit activities, to the point where free market
entrepreneurs are publicly vilified in ngs, for trying to make a
living.(Just ask Bryan)
As for giving items away for free - why? To another Value Village type
swindle, so some *&^%$# Jew can make extra cash off your donations?
Never. I agree with the poster, better to smash and fully destroy.
As for chritable donation receipts, they are hardly worth anything,
especially when compared to Political donation receipts (usually
called graft and kickback money)
n Sat, 28 Jun 2003 18:16:26 GMT, "\"KATO\"" <URBANWARRIOR@no-spam>
wrote:
>"Top Poster" <Top@no-spam> wrote in message
>news:9kjLa.829$Fy1.42676@no-spam
>> > You'd destroy everything rather than give it to charity?
>> >
>>
>> Charity says every one pays,even her boy friend
>
>
>Is Charity your mom's name or is that what she told you she calls it!
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
>> they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear.
>If
>> a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
>> should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded,
>but
>> the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the
>erroneous
>>
>> Angry_Mime <Moonscape@no-spam> wrote in message
>> news:MWhLa.13560$ZS3.1716689@no-spam
>> >
>> > "HolHoHo" <unknown@no-spam> wrote in message
>> > news:rj8rfvku6tefbm7nh6l9q8v8i82pthpljb@no-spam
>> > > Why should he GIVE THEM AWAY FREE?
>> > > I never got anything for free, and if it was me, sooner than give for
>> > > free, I would invite some friends, and we would have a SMASHING PARTY,
>> > > to destroy the items into unusable refuse.
>> >
>> > You'd destroy everything rather than give it to charity?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
Hey Homestation! Still trying to unload those "HOT" computers? Did the
Edmonton City
Police raid your home yet? where are you hiding now?
"Disgusted" <unknown@no-spam> wrote in message
news:luksfv4udhfrqujbisjh4kt0047oufiuor@no-spam
> In Edmonton there seem to be more el cheapo SOB's, than actual cash
> buyers, for just about anything!!
>
> Constant carping from non-buyers, either because they have no money,
> or else spend on illicit activities, to the point where free market
> entrepreneurs are publicly vilified in ngs, for trying to make a
> living.(Just ask Bryan)
>
> As for giving items away for free - why? To another Value Village type
> swindle, so some *&^%$# Jew can make extra cash off your donations?
> Never. I agree with the poster, better to smash and fully destroy.
>
> As for chritable donation receipts, they are hardly worth anything,
> especially when compared to Political donation receipts (usually
> called graft and kickback money)
>
>
>
>
> n Sat, 28 Jun 2003 18:16:26 GMT, "\"KATO\"" <URBANWARRIOR@no-spam>
> wrote:
>
>
> >"Top Poster" <Top@no-spam> wrote in message
> >news:9kjLa.829$Fy1.42676@no-spam
> >> > You'd destroy everything rather than give it to charity?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Charity says every one pays,even her boy friend
> >
> >
> >Is Charity your mom's name or is that what she told you she calls it!
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin
once
> >> they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held
dear.
> >If
> >> a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
> >> should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded,
> >but
> >> the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the
> >erroneous
> >>
> >> Angry_Mime <Moonscape@no-spam> wrote in message
> >> news:MWhLa.13560$ZS3.1716689@no-spam
> >> >
> >> > "HolHoHo" <unknown@no-spam> wrote in message
> >> > news:rj8rfvku6tefbm7nh6l9q8v8i82pthpljb@no-spam
> >> > > Why should he GIVE THEM AWAY FREE?
> >> > > I never got anything for free, and if it was me, sooner than give
for
> >> > > free, I would invite some friends, and we would have a SMASHING
PARTY,
> >> > > to destroy the items into unusable refuse.
> >> >
> >> > You'd destroy everything rather than give it to charity?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>