AB POLITICS 45 RE 500 000
From: "Paul Keenleyside" (nospam2bcpl8z@no-spam)
Subject: Re: $500,000
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:56:55 GMT


"MI Wakefield" <bedlam@no-spam> wrote in message news:_QLJa.1752$iM4.258652@no-spam > Does a standard Liberal party membership get me the half-million-dollar tax > write-off of back-taxes, or do I have to do something special?

You have to lick some Liberal Senator's bums in order to get the tax write off. Hopefully they'll be clean when they drop the linen, and you start the rimmin'.














From: JS (jstaniec@no-spam)
Subject: Re: $500,000
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:20:10 -0600

MI Wakefield wrote:

> Does a standard Liberal party membership get me the half-million-dollar tax > write-off of back-taxes, or do I have to do something special?

First you have to be wealthy enough to owe half million in back taxes......


From: E. Barry Bruyea (crested@no-spam)
Subject: Re: $500,000
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 06:18:30 -0400

On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:14:18 -0400, "MI Wakefield"
<bedlam@no-spam> wrote:

>Does a standard Liberal party membership get me the half-million-dollar tax >write-off of back-taxes, or do I have to do something special?

Nothing special; just being a liberal party hack is usually sufficient.
>


From: Steve (steve@no-spam)
Subject: Re: $500,000
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 23:57:12 +1200

E. Barry Bruyea allegedly said:

> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:14:18 -0400, "MI Wakefield"
> <bedlam@no-spam> wrote:
> >>Does a standard Liberal party membership get me the half-million-dollar >>tax write-off of back-taxes, or do I have to do something special?
> > > Nothing special; just being a liberal party hack is usually > sufficient.

When Mulroney was in, you only needed to be a Conservative party hack.
-- Steve

From: E. Barry Bruyea (crested@no-spam)
Subject: Re: $500,000
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 20:47:52 -0400

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 23:57:12 +1200, Steve <steve@no-spam> wrote:

>E. Barry Bruyea allegedly said:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:14:18 -0400, "MI Wakefield"
>> <bedlam@no-spam> wrote:
>> >>>Does a standard Liberal party membership get me the half-million-dollar >>>tax write-off of back-taxes, or do I have to do something special?
>> >> >> Nothing special; just being a liberal party hack is usually >> sufficient.
>
>When Mulroney was in, you only needed to be a Conservative party hack.
Maybe, but the corruption, unethical conduct and downright lying under the liberals is starting to make Mulroney et al look like amateurs.
Just compare the records.


From: "Paul Keenleyside" (nospam2bcpl8z@no-spam)
Subject: Re: $500,000
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:04:30 GMT

"E. Barry Bruyea" <crested@no-spam> wrote in message news:s7shfv4dhl7b3uk2fud89cgd599q9eusua@no-spam > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 23:57:12 +1200, Steve <steve@no-spam> wrote:
>
> >E. Barry Bruyea allegedly said:
> >
> >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:14:18 -0400, "MI Wakefield"
> >> <bedlam@no-spam> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Does a standard Liberal party membership get me the half-million-dollar > >>>tax write-off of back-taxes, or do I have to do something special?
> >>
> >>
> >> Nothing special; just being a liberal party hack is usually > >> sufficient.
> >
> >When Mulroney was in, you only needed to be a Conservative party hack.
>
>
> Maybe, but the corruption, unethical conduct and downright lying under > the liberals is starting to make Mulroney et al look like amateurs.
> Just compare the records.

Now that's very true. the Tories had nothing over the federal Liberals on that subject. The federal Liberals are the best in the business.

There's will be alot of that patronage shit going on after the federal Liberal Leadership convention and when Jean Chretien begins to wind down his time in the Prime Minister's Office. Senseless and useless Senate appointments, Appointments to ambassadorships, etc. etc for the good ol' boys and girls on the federal Liberal fundraising list. If Shelia Copps doesn't make it to Cabinet with Martin, she'll get a political reward, as will Boudrais and a few other federal Liberal hasbeens.

Wait for it. Be in front of the TV watching the National with Peter Mansbridge when it happens.

>


From: "Ian King" (iankingREMOVETHIS@no-spam)
Subject: Re: $500,000
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:33:30 GMT

"E. Barry Bruyea" <crested@no-spam> wrote in message news:da9gfv4gois4tdk6guta230m4de70i33v1@no-spam > On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:14:18 -0400, "MI Wakefield"
> <bedlam@no-spam> wrote:
>
> >Does a standard Liberal party membership get me the half-million-dollar tax > >write-off of back-taxes, or do I have to do something special?
>
>
> Nothing special; just being a liberal party hack is usually > sufficient.

Not for that sort of a deal, you've got to be a particularly devoted (and well-connected) hack to swing a deal like Rad's.

-- ian a. king / east vancouver, bc / ianking [at] shaw [dot] ca more at http://vancouverscrum.blogspot.com