These ARE fantastic shots...
I imagine you have been doing this for a long time but I've got to ask...
How many rolls do you go through to get shots like these?
Pete...
"Glenn" <glennREMOVE@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f095755@no-spam
> http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.cgi?116536
> http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.cgi?116537
> http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.cgi?116540
>
>
Hi Glenn, for us peasants that can't afford $6,000 digital cameras, what
sort of scanners are out there
that do a reasonable job for under $500.
Thanx.
"Glenn" <glennREMOVE@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f0d216b@no-spam
> Dunno, More a photographer than a sales rep.
>
> Incidently, don't need a $6000 digital camera. A normal works just the
same,
> just the output is different
I'd have to agree with that - my 5700 while it has some disadvanges due to
being a point and shoot (albeit an expensive one), its output for all
intents and purposes matches cameras twice the price and more, and certainly
matches that of (neg) film. It is NOT a good camera for moving subjects - I
am awaiting some technological advancement in that area...
cheers
pix
try the Canon 5000F
"Graeme Hogan" <ghogan01@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f0c99f8$0$26633$afc38c87@no-spam
> Hi Glenn, for us peasants that can't afford $6,000 digital cameras, what
> sort of scanners are out there
> that do a reasonable job for under $500.
> Thanx.
>
>
>