AUS BICYCLE 35 RE COMPUTERS WITH CADENCE
Subject: Re: Computers with cadence
From: lincolnr (usenet-forum@no-spam)
Date: 29 Jun 2003 21:00:01 +0950


I've got the Sigma on one bike and Flight Deck on the other. I prefer actual cadence to estimated cadence. Half the time I don't trust what Flight Deck is telling my anyway, it's a clunky computer and not intuative at all. Every battery replacement is a serious pain, having to reprogram all of the gears...maybe they fixed the friendliness in the latest versions...I dunno. Only criticism with the Sigma is it chews batteries.

The Campy uses a real cadence sensor.

--
>--------------------------< Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com

Subject: Re: Computers with cadence







From: Malcom (usenet-forum@no-spam)
Date: 1 Aug 2003 14:06:36 +0950

Paulie wrote:
> Hi Bikers,
> Looking for a good bike computer with cadence for my new road bike. Have > used a Cateye Astrale for 4 years, no problems really except that it > doesn't like rain and the mileage cannot be preprogrammed at battery > change. Am considering the new Sigma 1600, looks good with a better $
> than the newer astrale 8. Does anybody have any > suggestions/recommendations?
> Cheers,
> P
Hi Paulie I have an Astrale and an Echo F2. The Echo works great except you can't move the display around like the Astrale. I prefer the cadence in larger size numerals. The Echos are about the same price and might be worth a look at though.

--
>--------------------------< Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com

From: John Staines (John.Staines@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Computers with cadence
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 04:46:08 GMT

Hi,

I have a Sigma 1200 (you have to buy an attachment (about $16.00) to display cadence) it's been great. I got caught in a total downpour not long ago and it didn't miss a heart beat. It's also packed with useful features.

My only gripe, and it's a small one, would be that it doesn't have a sleep function to maximise battery life but other than that it's great!

John
Malcom wrote:
> > Paulie wrote:
> > Hi Bikers,
> > Looking for a good bike computer with cadence for my new road bike. Have > > used a Cateye Astrale for 4 years, no problems really except that it > > doesn't like rain and the mileage cannot be preprogrammed at battery > > change. Am considering the new Sigma 1600, looks good with a better $
> > than the newer astrale 8. Does anybody have any > > suggestions/recommendations?
> > Cheers,
> > P > > Hi Paulie I have an Astrale and an Echo F2. The Echo works great except > you can't move the display around like the Astrale. I prefer the cadence > in larger size numerals. The Echos are about the same price and might be > worth a look at though.


Subject: Re: Computers with cadence
From: lincolnr (usenet-forum@no-spam)
Date: 2 Aug 2003 08:50:04 +0950

John Staines wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a Sigma 1200 (you have to buy an attachment (about $16.00) to > display cadence) it's been great. I got caught in a total downpour > not long ago and it didn't miss a heart beat. It's also packed with > useful features.
> My only gripe, and it's a small one, would be that it doesn't have a > sleep function to maximise battery life but other than that it's great!
> John > Malcom wrote:
> >
> > Paulie wrote:
> > > Hi Bikers, Looking for a good bike computer with cadence for my > > > new road bike. Have used a Cateye Astrale for 4 years, no problems > > > really except that it doesn't like rain and the mileage cannot be > > > preprogrammed at battery change. Am considering the new Sigma > > > 1600, looks good with a better $ than the newer astrale 8. Does > > > anybody have any suggestions/recommendations? Cheers, P > >
> > Hi Paulie I have an Astrale and an Echo F2. The Echo works great > > except you can't move the display around like the Astrale. I prefer > > the cadence in larger size numerals. The Echos are about the same > > price and might be worth a look at though.

John, I have the 1200 too. How much battery lif are you gettig out of yours? Mine is atrocious, around 6 months.

--
>--------------------------< Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com