AUS CARS 46 RE WANTED BRAIN FOR SCOTT HILLARD
From: "Shakesdoodle" (knobdoodle@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Wanted - Brain for Scott Hillard.
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 20:01:19 +1000


It's spelt RETARD!
You know; like a fucking retard who crossposts to multiple newsgroups he doesn't read.

Hope that helps....
-- Clem [I Knob; therefore I am.]
"SG1" <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in message news:3F028CCA.8060002@no-spam > Rainbow Warrior wrote:
> > SG1 <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in message > > news:3F01530C.9060509@no-spam > >
> >>However a a bit more abuse couldnt hurt.
> >>Retred.
> >>
> >>sg1
> >
> >
> > You keep missing an "a" in retread.
> >
> > Pat > > Brisbane, Australia > > http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~mangey/
> >
> >
>
> Hey Rainbow, long time no post. Been on holidays?
> Never use em, not anymore at least.
> You are right keep missing the a in retread, guess Im a victim of ms > word with spell check. Couldnt be stuffed spellchekcing news posts.
>
> sg1
>


Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:39:37 +1000
From: Dave Horsfall (daveh@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Wanted - Brain for Scott Hillard.

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Rainbow Warrior wrote:

> > >> > * . . . . o o o o o > > >> > * _____ o _______
> > >> > * ____==== ]OO|_n_n__][. |lamer|
> > >> > * [________]_|__|________)< |ville|
> > >> > * oo oo 'oo OOOO-| oo\\_ ~~~|~~~
> > >> > * +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-$1-+--+--+--+--+
> >
> > Wouldnt it be a 4-8-4 2 front 4 middle and 2 rear on each side.. was > > when I was into N Scale, which is last 20 yrs.
>
> Looking at the drawing the 5th and 6th axle from the left appear to be > under the coal carrier than the Locomotive though, making it a 4-8-0 then or > were the coal carriers wheels included?

You sure you're viewing this in a fixed-width font (as if there was any other way)?

Definitely a 2-4-2 - you count the wheels on one side...

-- Dave

Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:24:36 +1000
From: Dave Horsfall (daveh@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Wanted - Brain for Scott Hillard.

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Rainbow Warrior wrote:

> > > > >> > * . . . . o o o o o > > > > >> > * _____ o _______
> > > > >> > * ____==== ]OO|_n_n__][. |lamer|
> > > > >> > * [________]_|__|________)< |ville|
> > > > >> > * oo oo 'oo OOOO-| oo\\_ ~~~|~~~
> > > > >> > * +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-$1-+--+--+--+--+
> > > >
> > > > Wouldnt it be a 4-8-4 2 front 4 middle and 2 rear on each side.. was > > > > when I was into N Scale, which is last 20 yrs.
> > >
> > > Looking at the drawing the 5th and 6th axle from the left appear to be > > > under the coal carrier than the Locomotive though, making it a 4-8-0
> then or > > > were the coal carriers wheels included?
> >
> > You sure you're viewing this in a fixed-width font (as if there was > > any other way)?
> >
> > Definitely a 2-4-2 - you count the wheels on one side...
>
> That's probably what he meant but I think the 7th & 8th axles from the front > should be under the cab, not the coupling.

They *are* under the cab; what font are you using?

-- Dave