Scott Hillard wrote:
>
> "SG1" <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in
> message news:3EF3DF6B.2070802@no-spam
>
> > Flashing high beams behind someone to signal your overtaking is annoying
> > to the driver in front.
>
> So piss off out of the way.
>
> > Do it to me and I'll flash you back when you get passed.
>
> Do that to me and you will regret it.
So what are you gonna do eat them you fat wanker?
--
Look beyond the window, don't just focus on your own reflection.
abuse@no-spam
for all spam.
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 20:47:01 +1000
st3ph3nm wrote:
> SG1 <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in message news:<3EF3DF6B.2070802@no-spam>...
>
>>Flashing high beams behind someone to signal your overtaking is annoying
>>to the driver in front. Do it to me and I'll flash you back when you get
>>passed.
>
>
> At the risk of a flame-war, if people moved out of the far right lane
> to begin with, we wouldn't need to flash at all, would we? Except at
> cricket matches, of course, but that's another matter altogether. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
We havent even touched on that topic yet.
I guess Everyone here agrees assholes riding the right lane should be
'coaxed' off the road.
sg1
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:01:14 +1000
>
>>Cant say I tailgate as I have a 4wd and it doesnt brake as well as a car.
>>But if someone was to use their bastard light on me I dont know what I'd
>>end up doing.
>
>
> You don't seem to know much at all.
>
>
Were you born an idiot or did you take lessons from someone close to
you, !! Simple fact, 4wd do not brake as well as cars (presuming brakes
are in good working order !!
>>Possibly running them off the road, or reporting them, or following till
>>they stop and smashing the light with extendable batton - possibly
>>continuing if it took too long to catch them - depends on the mood I
>
> guess.
>
> Which would be quite amusing, if they simply shot you when you approached
> their vehicle with a weapon in hand.
Hasnt happend yet. LOL.
>
>
>>Actually I'd take the plate down and if I couldnt catch them I'd report
>>them. Justice in one way or another.
>
>
>
> That could be almost as dangerous....for you.
>
>
>
Why do you bother posting scott? You are obviously group clown of your
local group.
sg1
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:28:26 +1000
Generally a crossposted topic is good for a the group.
It adds a little variety and infuses external opinion. Occasionally I
quite enjoy it, I dont have to add groups to my reader and I still get
to read options and discussions I'm usually not privy to seeing without
the spam that goes with subscribing to an extra group. Especially one as
general as aus.cars which I would expect attracts many posts.
A BIG MUTIPLE GROUP HUG for MA who was and is usually the individual
person who brings us all together. The only person (besides spamers) who
sees that newsgroups are a usefull tool to achieve ones strategic if not
personal and selfish objectives.
I am happy that for the first time I've noticed in two years that he's
finally dropped the name Motorsist's Advocate and chosen MA.
I hereby dub MA - mama Bear. Because,
a) there is a possibility you actually belive in a cause and think you
can or should 'protect' us from the 'big bad nasties' out in the real
non virtual world we are not aware of. (thanks and kiss kiss)
b) you bring this great big happy newsgroup family together. (just like
every good mama bear does)
c) you feel obligated to inform us of things we dont care to know. Or
possibly we do know but dont think important enough to make a fuss over.
d) my present twised state of awareness observes a similarity between MA
and mama bear. ???
sg1
I enjoy posting when I'm pissed cos then you make me laugh.
Hey you never know, I may post an apology tomorrow.
Doubt it.
ROFLMAO.
(actually not quite that bad but definitely *G)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:33:52 +1000
Generally a crossposted topic is good for a the group.
It adds a little variety and infuses external opinion. Occasionally I
quite enjoy it, I dont have to add groups to my reader and I still get
to read opinions and discussions I'm usually not privy to seeing without
the spam that goes with subscribing to an extra group. Especially one as
general as aus.cars which I would expect attracts many posts.
A BIG MUTIPLE GROUP HUG for MA who was and is usually the individual
person who brings us all together. The only person (besides spamers) who
sees that newsgroups are a useful tool to achieve ones strategic if not
personal and selfish objectives.
I am happy that for the first time I've noticed in two years that he's
finally dropped the name Motorsist's Advocate and chosen MA.
I hereby dub MA - mama Bear. Because,
a) there is a possibility you actually belive in a cause and think you
can or should 'protect' us from the 'big bad nasties' out in the real
non virtual world we are not aware of. (thanks and kiss kiss)
b) you bring this great big happy newsgroup family together. (just like
every good mama bear does)
c) you feel obligated to inform us of things we dont care to know. Or
possibly we do know but dont think important enough to make a fuss over.
d) my present twisted state of awareness observes a similarity between
MA and mama bear. ???
sg1
I enjoy posting when I'm pissed cos then you make me laugh.
Hey you never know, I may post an apology tomorrow.
Doubt it.
ROFLMAO.
(actually not quite that bad but definitely *G)
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:54:26 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
> Some gutless coward calling itself
> "conehead" <conehead@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3ef83be4@no-spam
>
>>"Scott Hillard" <shillard@no-spam> wrote in message
>>news:PkTJa.119$JS.5466@no-spam
>
>
>
>>>Presuming they actually see your indicator, which they probably won't if
>>>you don't flash them.
>>
>
>>Just my luck. Here I am reading stuff on Tuesday, when some fuckwit from
>>aus.politics is already posting on Wednesday.
>
>
> Life's tough, you could always cap yourself if it's too much of a challenge.
>
>
>
>
You retred, keep off the newsgroups or subscribe to fools.post.rediculously
sg1
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:54:50 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
> Some gutless prawn calling itself
> "conehead" <conehead@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3efd7b6b$1@no-spam
>
>>"Scott Hillard" <shillard@no-spam> wrote in message
>>news:SBeLa.425$_I3.21179@no-spam
>
>
>>>Life's tough, you could always cap yourself if it's too much of a
>>>challenge.
>>
>
>>If you'd like a battle of wits I suggest you be more than half-prepared
>
> next
>
>>time, girly.
>
>
>
> I offered Andrew Denton some more rope, since he clearly didn't have enough.
> Still plenty left for the likes of you.
>
>
>
Still talking shit scott.
bugger off retred.
sg1
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:55:49 +1000
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:15:50 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
> Some gutless coward hiding behind the pathetic alias of
> "SG1" <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in
> message news:3EFE6345.4000709@no-spam
>
>
> Wow, in 8 years of usenet posting, this is without a doubt the most pissweak
> effort I've ever seen.
>
> Congratulations, gutless.
>
>
>
If youve been coping shit for 8 years and your still an idiot I'm
wasting my time.
sg1
Scott Hillard wrote:
>
> Some gutless coward hiding behind the pathetic alias of
> "SG1" <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in
> message news:3EFE6345.4000709@no-spam
>
> Wow, in 8 years of usenet posting, this is without a doubt the most pissweak
> effort I've ever seen.
>
> Congratulations, gutless.
The only gutless one is yourself Scotty
Your idiotic clownlike Rod Speed wannabe type postings are the laughing
stock of usenet.
Hows the ballet going you ponce?
shillard@no-spam
shillard@no-spam
shillard@no-spam
shillard@no-spam
shillard@no-spam
shillard@no-spam
--
Look beyond the window, don't just focus on your own reflection.
abuse@no-spam
for all spam.
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:24:27 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
...
> Wow, in 8 years of usenet posting, this is
> without a doubt the most pissweak effort
> I've ever seen.
...
ROTFLMAO!! :)
--
--
Forg! -DUH#6=- (Y1)
"...
this crazy Forg surrounds me
..."
[Live - "When Dolphins Cry"]
Forg wrote:
> Eh?
> Unless he's changed, Hillard is quite different to Rod
> Speed. Hillard is somewhat like Stacey Keach's character in
> American History X; he's a fairly well-off redneck with
> rather unsavoury beliefs which make Hitler seem pretty sane.
> Rod Speed is an argumentative twat with no real personal
> beliefs apart from what he can argue against.
>
> The two are quite different; Speed just argues, Hillard has
> twisted beliefs he argues for.
Maybe so but hillard tries to imitate rod speed instead of using his own
posting style.
I've crossed swords with the fat prick a few years back and really
rattled his cage though he may not think so.
every now and then he neds a reality check.
He still is a laughing stock particularly in aus.motorcycles
He'll probably challenge this with a simplistic idiotic one liner in the
rod speed fashion or try and sway this his way unsucessfully mind you.
Cheers.
>
> --
> --
> Forg! -DUH#6=- (Y1)
>
> "...
> this crazy Forg surrounds me
> ..."
> [Live - "When Dolphins Cry"]
--
Look beyond the window, don't just focus on your own reflection.
abuse@no-spam
for all spam.
Damien wrote:
>
> "Smee" <Smee@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3EFFA59D.72DB1375@no-spam
>
> > hillard deserves what he gets like all racist rednecks
>
> I've never seen him racist. But I admit I only see him in aus.cars.
Only when he crossposts from aus.politics
>
> > If he's too stupid to keep his real email address
>
> What do you mean? He doesn't post using an email address that gives
> absolutely no clue? I don't think that constitutes stupidity.
Look at the headers his email addy is in there. nospam does not disguise
an email address.
>
> > then he reaps what he sows.
>
> I've never seen Scott de-spam an email address.
I mean his racist redneck arrogant views.
>
> > You can't compare me to pesty because some (not all) my posts have
> substance.
>
> That's true. I stand corrected.
No problem:-)
Cheers
--
Look beyond the window, don't just focus on your own reflection.
abuse@no-spam
for all spam.
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:23:24 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
> Captain of the kindergarten spelling squad, some gutless tosser posting as
> "SG1" <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in
> message news:3EFEAE46.2070400@no-spam
>
>>Scott Hillard wrote:
>
>
>>>Wow, in 8 years of usenet posting, this is without a doubt the most
>>
> pissweak
>
>>>effort I've ever seen.
>>
>
>>>Congratulations, gutless.
>>
>
>>If youve been coping shit for 8 years and your still an idiot I'm
>>wasting my time.
>
>
>
> At least you got some of it right, you are indeed wasting your time.
>
>
>
However a a bit more abuse couldnt hurt.
Retred.
sg1
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:25:19 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
> "Smee" <Smee@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3EFEC72A.AB1ECC3@no-spam
>
>
>>Maybe so but hillard tries to imitate rod speed instead of using his own
>>posting style.
>
>
> Wrong - again.
>
>
>>I've crossed swords with the fat prick a few years back and really
>>rattled his cage though he may not think so.
>
>
> So memorable that I don't even recall.....clearly you got that wrong.
> Again.
>
>
>>every now and then he neds a reality check.
>
>
> Who is Ned?
Pure sign of a self obsessed retard. picking on a type-o.
>
>
>>He still is a laughing stock particularly in aus.motorcycles
>
>
> Clearly the greatest collection of minds on the net.....
>
>
>>He'll probably challenge this with a simplistic idiotic one liner in the
>>rod speed fashion or try and sway this his way unsucessfully mind you.
>
>
> Wrong, again.......
>
>
You really have no class scotty.
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:26:25 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
> Some pathetic coward calling itself
> "Smee" <Smee@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3EFEB5BC.94D842F@no-spam
>
>>Scott Hillard wrote:
>
>
>>>Congratulations, gutless.
>>
>
>>The only gutless one is yourself Scotty
>
>
> Pathetic, boy. Even you can do better than that.
>
>
>>shillard@no-spam
>>shillard@no-spam
>>shillard@no-spam
>>shillard@no-spam
>>shillard@no-spam
>>shillard@no-spam
>
>
>
> You think that's going to make a difference, boy?
>
> Pathetic.
>
>
>
You have a lot of friends Scott.
Always thought it a loser name...
sg1
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:28:16 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
> Some gutless coward hiding behind the pathetic alias of
> "SG1" <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in
> message news:3EFE62F2.3040507@no-spam
>
>
>>You retred, keep off the newsgroups or subscribe to
>
> fools.post.rediculously
>
>
> You're clearly not the moderator of alt.spelling......
You know snott, if you werent suck a dickhead you wouldnt need to spend
your life seeking attention on newsgroups. Retred.
sg1
ROFLMAO
Good one:-)
Rainbow Warrior wrote:
>
>
> Don't forget those ballet loving non racist rednecks too and the non redneck
> racist ballet lovers and the ballet hating racist rednecks, and the racist
> smoking, ballet hating rednecks, and the greenneck, soccer hating, VB
> drinking, right lane hogging, short arsed, chocolate lovers too.
>
> Pat
> Brisbane, Australia
> http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~mangey/
>
>
--
Look beyond the window, don't just focus on your own reflection.
abuse@no-spam
for all spam.
Scott Hillard wrote:
>
> Some pathetic coward calling itself
> "Smee" <Smee@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3EFEB5BC.94D842F@no-spam
More Rod Speedisms
You haven't got anything to say for yourself so you copy Rod Speed eh Scotty?
.
> > Scott Hillard wrote:
>
> > > Congratulations, gutless.
>
> > The only gutless one is yourself Scotty
>
> Pathetic, boy. Even you can do better than that.
I can but you are no competition Rod Speed wannabe.
>
> > shillard@no-spam
> > shillard@no-spam
> > shillard@no-spam
> > shillard@no-spam
> > shillard@no-spam
> > shillard@no-spam
>
> You think that's going to make a difference, boy?
Boy?
You Foghorn Leghorn?
>
> Pathetic.
I don't copy anybody else's posting style so who is the pathetic one?
--
Look beyond the window, don't just focus on your own reflection.
abuse@no-spam
for all spam.
Scott Hillard wrote:
>
> "Smee" <Smee@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3EFEC72A.AB1ECC3@no-spam
>
> > Maybe so but hillard tries to imitate rod speed instead of using his own
> > posting style.
>
> Wrong - again.
Not wrong I couldn't be more correct if I made the sffort to try.
You do use his style and there is no denying it.
>
> > I've crossed swords with the fat prick a few years back and really
> > rattled his cage though he may not think so.
>
> So memorable that I don't even recall.....clearly you got that wrong.
> Again.
I said you would be in denial
I am correct again.
>
> > every now and then he neds a reality check.
>
> Who is Ned?
Too stupid to pick up a typo?
>
> > He still is a laughing stock particularly in aus.motorcycles
>
> Clearly the greatest collection of minds on the net.....
>
> > He'll probably challenge this with a simplistic idiotic one liner in the
> > rod speed fashion or try and sway this his way unsucessfully mind you.
>
> Wrong, again......
Yes you are.
--
Look beyond the window, don't just focus on your own reflection.
abuse@no-spam
for all spam.
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 17:42:02 +1000
Rainbow Warrior wrote:
> SG1 <spamers_should_make_money_honestly@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3F01530C.9060509@no-spam
>
>>However a a bit more abuse couldnt hurt.
>>Retred.
>>
>>sg1
>
>
> You keep missing an "a" in retread.
>
> Pat
> Brisbane, Australia
> http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~mangey/
>
>
Hey Rainbow, long time no post. Been on holidays?
Never use em, not anymore at least.
You are right keep missing the a in retread, guess Im a victim of ms
word with spell check. Couldnt be stuffed spellchekcing news posts.
sg1
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 23:05:38 +1000
Shakesdoodle wrote:
> It's spelt RETARD!
> You know; like a fucking retard who crossposts to multiple newsgroups he doesn't read.
> Hope that helps....
Shake,
I guess the retread joke is lost on you.
ps. didnt start the crosspost.
sg1
Neil Fisher wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:53:49 +1000, "Scott Hillard"
> <shillard@no-spam> wrote:
>
> >Some pathetic coward calling itself
> >"Smee" <Smee@no-spam> wrote in message
> >news:3EFEB5BC.94D842F@no-spam
> >> Scott Hillard wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Gee, Scott, looks like not too many people have much of a sense of
> humour, eh? Don't worry, *I'm* laughing...
>
>
So am I
*AT* Scotty
--
Look beyond the window, don't just focus on your own reflection.
abuse@no-spam
for all spam.
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 12:32:07 +1000
Scott Hillard wrote:
> "Smee" <Smee@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3F03ED65.6047CA44@no-spam
>
>>So am I
>>*AT* Scotty
>
>
>
> Along with all of your mates?
>
>
>
you still posting loser?
catch a train, its headed your way..
* . . . . o o o o o
* _____ o _______
* ____==== ]OO|_n_n__][. |lamer|
* [________]_|__|________)< |ville|
* oo oo 'oo OOOO-| oo\\_ ~~~|~~~
* +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-$1-+--+--+--+--+
sg1