AUS DVD 4 RE WHY DON T AL QUEDA USE DVD
From: Petzl (petzl+news2@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Why don't Al Queda use DVD?
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:38:30 +1000


On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:59:21 +0930, "Snookie" <snookie69@no-spam>
wrote:

>
>"Petzl" <petzl+news2@no-spam> wrote in message >news:vlqdfvg933m78dtubvadjq1olfv0u13a40@no-spam >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:24:27 +0930, "Snookie" <snookie69@no-spam>
>> wrote:
>[snipped]
>
[S]
>> As for their crackly tapes and low quality video it is to try and >> conceal their lies and deception.(often fabrications by Al-Jazeera >> for an Arab audience)
>>
>> When a Al-Qaeda tapes or video is fuzzy (as they all are) it becomes >> guesswork as to who is on them using "voice prints" and or biometrics.
>>
>> The evidence of cutting and pasting these video's suggest it is done >> in a studio by someone of say Al-Jazeera's capabilities >
>Does this not illustrate that everything we have seen in the media can be >one only a taint of the actual truth. The winner be the one / s who can >taint the truth to their best advantage?
>

In Australia The USa Western Europe if papers 'got it wrong" to often their creditability would suffer, causing distribution & profits to follow.

Other media sources or platforms delight in exposé
In the free world, the press is often out with the truth before the Government and this is what they are paid for
I do not see Al-Jazeera making money in the west, as much of their reporting is fabricated and have yet to be taken as a credible source
Petzl -- LET'S LOOK OUT FOR AUSTRALIA http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/
Protecting our way of life from terrorist threat

From: Petzl (petzl+news2@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Why don't Al Queda use DVD?
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:37:33 +1000

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:55:55 +1000, Craig Welch <craig@no-spam>
wrote:

>On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:55:16 +1000, Petzl <petzl+news2@no-spam>
>wrote:
>
>>Most digital cameras now do not even need light (zero lux) crystal >>images >><http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Sony/sony_dscf717.asp>
>
>All cameras, digital or otherwise, need a light source.

In this case if you can see so does this camera
It also carries its own Infra Red light source in pitch black darkness. meaning it can take photos/video when the operator cannot see
Petzl
-- Petzl
-- Virus scan your computer
On line virus scanners available here
"Trend Micro's free online virus scanner"
http://housecall.trendmicro.com/
or "Panda ActiveScan"
http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/

There are free virus detectors such as this one "AVG 6.0 Free Edition"
http://www.grisoft.com
Check your computer for "Spy Bots"
freeware available <http://security.kolla.de/>


From: "Dyna Soar" (dyna_soar_au.REMOVE..THIS.@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Why don't Al Queda use DVD?
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:06:48 +0800

Petzl wrote:

>
> In Australia The USa Western Europe if papers 'got it wrong" to often > their creditability would suffer, causing distribution & profits to > follow.

Huh? Translation, please.

-- Dyna.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.


From: Craig Welch (craig@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Why don't Al Queda use DVD?
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:13:23 +1000

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 08:32:12 +1000, Petzl <petzl+news2@no-spam>
wrote:

>>>>>I think he is a logical contender for the "Nobel peace prize"
>>
>>>>Yep. Invading other countries on made-up pretexts is a good >>>>qualification for such a prize.
>>
>>>It was for both legal and something you don't comprehend (DECENCY)
>>
>>It was certainly not legal. And decent? Give over. Thousands of >>innocent people dead, the country's economy in tatters, the US now >>ripping them off in every way ... that's decency? You don't know the >>meaning of the word.
>
>Innocent? Training terrorists for "September 11th" attacks on freedom >is innocent?

There you go again, making inaccurate associations.

Clearly I'm referring to the innocent Iraqi citizens that our Government has helped to kill.

These were not the people that trained terrorists for the 11/9
attacks.

What was your point again?

-- Craig