Its very rare that get to an opportunity to speak to anyone within Australia
who has an advanced Torah/Kabbalistic knowledge. However this week I had
occasion to exchange email with one of Australia's finest, Rabbi Laibl Wolf
who was recommended to me by the Jewish Museum of Australia.
I eagerly sought him out and in responding to his questions about myself and
where my interest stemmed from, my past/present spiritual orientation etc, I
presented to him my expansion of my favourite author Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan's
view of the magic square matrix [See:
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4 ] and its
chronological relationship to the creation of the world and to which I have
articulated as underpinning the Letters Patent to the Australian
Constitution.
Within his book titled, "The Light Beyond - Adventures in Hassidic Thought",
Rabbi Kaplan discusses the Kedushath Levi's view which connects directly to
my interpretation of the 9(9² +1)/2 = 369 {52W5D or 9 x 41} days matrix
which I have synchronised with Australia's geodesic 28 year solar eclipse
cycle {Solar eclipse on 23 Nov, 2003, but particularly 4 Dec 2002 & 25 Nov,
2030} as follows:
AXIOM #10 as Totality of Nature [Zayin {7+10+50 = 67 /#4}]
- Engendering Nature (#7 - Telos Topical year/day solar eclipse Monday
25 December, 2000 + 6 days = 122J3W1D : 6,000 / 666 = 9.009 ... (6
remaining)) ... 9(92 +1)/2 = 369 {52W5D or 9 x 41} days with center #41 Mem
= Thursday, 13 September, 2001 [#41 #41/(#41 - Playing with Reversal; cf:
vKabbalah JavaScript Class for Microsoft Internet Explorer Vsn 6.0) Hebrew
Calendar: {4 x 91 [30+30+31] Quarters (364 days : 1092 / 3 = 364 days)} + 5
CHAD? 354 day lunar year x 3 years = 1062 + 30 day month = 1092 days : 1092
/ 369 = 2 x 369 + 354 as typical lunar year & 9(92 +1)/2 {52W5D} - 3(32
+1)/2 {2W1D} = 354 as typical lunar year; For example:
{385 days} 29 Sept, 2000
{353 days} 17 Sept, 2001 +
{354 days} 6 Sept, 2002 +
{385 days} 26 Sept, 2003 = 1092 days.
Thus if the equation Telos {122J3W1D} = Arch {0} + c2 representing the
decade sequence, is then further synchronized with a topical solar eclipse
occurring solar 4 leap year and lunar 19 leap year cycle:
The usual equinox on 21 March within the Gregorian year 1996 as 1 Nissan,
5756 commences a reprise cycle of the 19 year lunar cycle. [Where each 19
year lunar cycle consists of 12 years x 12 lunar months each and 7 years x
13 lunar months each for a total of 235 lunar months. Of the 19 year cycle,
years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, 19 are considered to be leap years of 13 months
each. And to which a 30 day month known as Adar I, is inserted immediately
after the Hebrew month of Sh'vat {ie. the Hebrew year 5757 / 19 = 303 is
thus a lunar leap year} in the February/March {ie. 1997} period of the
Gregorian calendar year following.]
1997/5757 {Wednesday},
1998/5758 {Thursday},
1999/5759 {Friday},
2000/5760 {Saturday} + Solar Eclipse Monday 25 December, 2000 + 6 days of
the Topical {365.242198781} Year.
21 March 2015 {1 Nissan, 5775 = Reprise of 19 year lunar cycle}
21 March 2034 {1 Nissan, 5794 = Reprise of 19 year lunar cycle}
He says, "There are two opinions in the Talmud, 'One says that the world was
created in the month of Nissan {{#13, #12, #29 - Deeming/ Non-Assertion},
and one says that the world was created in the month of Tishri on Rosh
HaShanah {which in the year 2001 began on Tuesday, 18th September, 2001 as
the apogee of the 6,000 year Genesis creation reprise principle.}
As you may see, my Matrix interpretation {
9(92 +1)/2 = 369 {52W5D or 9 x 41} days with center #41 Mem = Thursday, 13
September, 2001 [#41 #41/(#41 - Playing with Reversal; cf: vKabbalah
JavaScript Class for Microsoft Internet Explorer Vsn 6.0
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/vkabbalah.html )
} is in complete agreement with him. That these two opinions actually do
not contradict each other. He goes on to say, "The main goal of creation
was actually that God should be able to delight in Israel {He that sees God,
He that prevails with God} in His world.
God has such delight when we do His will, recognise his greatness, and full
understand that everything was created for his glory.
The physical creation of the world took place in Tishrei {1st Rosh
HaShanah}. And this is something that even Mr. George W. Bush as President
of the United States of America, has acknowledged by publicly commenting
within the news media on the claim that this day--Wednesday 19 September,
2001 {2nd Rosh HaShanah}--was significant and recognized as the Creation Day
of the World by some religious communities of faith. according to my
studies, he seems to have been right on the button.
Rabbi Kaplan goes on to say, "At that time, the reason for its creation was
not known. It was not revealed until Nissan {3W1D - Nature amended in its
Nature / Nature contains Nature}, when God brought Israel out of Egypt.
Everyone then saw that God is the Master of the universe, that He created
all worlds, and that He alone is to be worshipped."
Indeed I said to Rabbi Wolf that I was able to distinguish between the
historical Chaldean interpretation given to Hebrew letters and have
developed my own chronological perspective which I provided to the Americans
prior to 11 September, 2001 as the transcendental basis by which they might
respond to religious fundamentalism--I am aware that Adolf Hitler may also
have attempted to deploy this architecture {ie. HRUMACHIS as the key to the
cypher change and the name of Akhenaten's High Priest} as his attempts to
annihilate the Jews.
It was therefore in the month of Nissan that the reason for creation was
made known, namely, that God's Essence should be revealed in the world. For
this was the purpose of creation.
And strangely it was at this time (actually 20 March, 2003) that the war on
Iraq started.
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 04:44:08 +0800
Dolf, you do realise it's against Bigpond's AUP to crosspost
garbage like this to a heap of different newsgroups don't
you? Unfortunately Bigpond don't really seem to care about
people breaching their AUP as you've been doing it for ages
despite multiple complaints made by many people.
Everyone who is sick of Dolf's crap may want to consider
forwarding his posts to abuse@no-spam they'll
probably ignore you but perhaps if they get enough
complaints about this moron they may do something.
Qolon wrote:
> Its very rare that get to an opportunity to speak to
anyone within Australia
> who has an advanced Torah/Kabbalistic knowledge. However
this week I had
> occasion to exchange email with one of Australia's
finest, Rabbi Laibl Wolf
> who was recommended to me by the Jewish Museum of Australia.
>
> I eagerly sought him out and in responding to his
questions about myself and
> where my interest stemmed from, my past/present spiritual
orientation etc, I
> presented to him my expansion of my favourite author
Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan's
> view of the magic square matrix [See:
>
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4
] and its
> chronological relationship to the creation of the world
and to which I have
> articulated as underpinning the Letters Patent to the
Australian
> Constitution.
>
> Within his book titled, "The Light Beyond - Adventures in
Hassidic Thought",
> Rabbi Kaplan discusses the Kedushath Levi's view which
connects directly to
> my interpretation of the 9(9² +1)/2 = 369 {52W5D or 9 x
41} days matrix
> which I have synchronised with Australia's geodesic 28
year solar eclipse
> cycle {Solar eclipse on 23 Nov, 2003, but particularly 4
Dec 2002 & 25 Nov,
> 2030} as follows:
>
> AXIOM #10 as Totality of Nature [Zayin {7+10+50 = 67 /#4}]
> - Engendering Nature (#7 - Telos Topical year/day
solar eclipse Monday
> 25 December, 2000 + 6 days = 122J3W1D : 6,000 / 666 =
9.009 ... (6
> remaining)) ... 9(92 +1)/2 = 369 {52W5D or 9 x 41} days
with center #41 Mem
> = Thursday, 13 September, 2001 [#41 #41/(#41 - Playing
with Reversal; cf:
> vKabbalah JavaScript Class for Microsoft Internet
Explorer Vsn 6.0) Hebrew
> Calendar: {4 x 91 [30+30+31] Quarters (364 days : 1092 /
3 = 364 days)} + 5
> CHAD? 354 day lunar year x 3 years = 1062 + 30 day month
= 1092 days : 1092
> / 369 = 2 x 369 + 354 as typical lunar year & 9(92 +1)/2
{52W5D} - 3(32
> +1)/2 {2W1D} = 354 as typical lunar year; For example:
> {385 days} 29 Sept, 2000
>
> {353 days} 17 Sept, 2001 +
> {354 days} 6 Sept, 2002 +
>
> {385 days} 26 Sept, 2003 = 1092 days.
>
> Thus if the equation Telos {122J3W1D} = Arch {0} + c2
representing the
> decade sequence, is then further synchronized with a
topical solar eclipse
> occurring solar 4 leap year and lunar 19 leap year cycle:
>
> The usual equinox on 21 March within the Gregorian year
1996 as 1 Nissan,
> 5756 commences a reprise cycle of the 19 year lunar
cycle. [Where each 19
> year lunar cycle consists of 12 years x 12 lunar months
each and 7 years x
> 13 lunar months each for a total of 235 lunar months. Of
the 19 year cycle,
> years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, 19 are considered to be leap
years of 13 months
> each. And to which a 30 day month known as Adar I, is
inserted immediately
> after the Hebrew month of Sh'vat {ie. the Hebrew year
5757 / 19 = 303 is
> thus a lunar leap year} in the February/March {ie. 1997}
period of the
> Gregorian calendar year following.]
>
> 1997/5757 {Wednesday},
> 1998/5758 {Thursday},
> 1999/5759 {Friday},
> 2000/5760 {Saturday} + Solar Eclipse Monday 25 December,
2000 + 6 days of
> the Topical {365.242198781} Year.
>
> 21 March 2015 {1 Nissan, 5775 = Reprise of 19 year lunar
cycle}
> 21 March 2034 {1 Nissan, 5794 = Reprise of 19 year lunar
cycle}
>
> He says, "There are two opinions in the Talmud, 'One says
that the world was
> created in the month of Nissan {{#13, #12, #29 - Deeming/
Non-Assertion},
> and one says that the world was created in the month of
Tishri on Rosh
> HaShanah {which in the year 2001 began on Tuesday, 18th
September, 2001 as
> the apogee of the 6,000 year Genesis creation reprise
principle.}
>
> As you may see, my Matrix interpretation {
>
> 9(92 +1)/2 = 369 {52W5D or 9 x 41} days with center #41
Mem = Thursday, 13
> September, 2001 [#41 #41/(#41 - Playing with Reversal;
cf: vKabbalah
> JavaScript Class for Microsoft Internet Explorer Vsn 6.0
>
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/vkabbalah.html )
>
> } is in complete agreement with him. That these two
opinions actually do
> not contradict each other. He goes on to say, "The main
goal of creation
> was actually that God should be able to delight in Israel
{He that sees God,
> He that prevails with God} in His world.
>
> God has such delight when we do His will, recognise his
greatness, and full
> understand that everything was created for his glory.
>
> The physical creation of the world took place in Tishrei
{1st Rosh
> HaShanah}. And this is something that even Mr. George W.
Bush as President
> of the United States of America, has acknowledged by
publicly commenting
> within the news media on the claim that this
day--Wednesday 19 September,
> 2001 {2nd Rosh HaShanah}--was significant and recognized
as the Creation Day
> of the World by some religious communities of faith.
according to my
> studies, he seems to have been right on the button.
>
> Rabbi Kaplan goes on to say, "At that time, the reason
for its creation was
> not known. It was not revealed until Nissan {3W1D -
Nature amended in its
> Nature / Nature contains Nature}, when God brought Israel
out of Egypt.
> Everyone then saw that God is the Master of the universe,
that He created
> all worlds, and that He alone is to be worshipped."
>
> Indeed I said to Rabbi Wolf that I was able to
distinguish between the
> historical Chaldean interpretation given to Hebrew
letters and have
> developed my own chronological perspective which I
provided to the Americans
> prior to 11 September, 2001 as the transcendental basis
by which they might
> respond to religious fundamentalism--I am aware that
Adolf Hitler may also
> have attempted to deploy this architecture {ie. HRUMACHIS
as the key to the
> cypher change and the name of Akhenaten's High Priest} as
his attempts to
> annihilate the Jews.
>
> It was therefore in the month of Nissan that the reason
for creation was
> made known, namely, that God's Essence should be revealed
in the world. For
> this was the purpose of creation.
>
> And strangely it was at this time (actually 20 March,
2003) that the war on
> Iraq started.
>
> - Qolon
> http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/
>
>
>
As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
years, I have yesterday received a new birth certificate as change of name.
I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which has
been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam>.
My pariticipation doesn't require his permission.
Various indications have been made to several newsgroups in which I have
participation, that as far psychopathic and sychophantic inidividuals such
as Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> {ie. Don't be fooled into believing that
their comments are in any benevolent--they never have been} are concernd
that I do not desire to receive or have necessity to receive messages from
them, which along with others serially disrupt EVERY post I make to the
newsgroups--I now have zero tolerance of them.
If they have no intention, or more important clearly lack the intellect for
participation within the subject which is capable of being inclusive of all
within the distribution list, then they should refrain from hate speech and
inciting others with their lust for anti-semitic hatred.
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4
"Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam
Dolf, you do realise it's against Bigpond's AUP to crosspost
garbage like this to a heap of different newsgroups don't
you? Unfortunately Bigpond don't really seem to care about
people breaching their AUP as you've been doing it for ages
despite multiple complaints made by many people.
Everyone who is sick of Dolf's crap may want to consider
forwarding his posts to abuse@no-spam they'll
probably ignore you but perhaps if they get enough
complaints about this moron they may do something.
Stop the spamming to aus.legal Qolon or Dolk or whatever you call youself.
This message has NOTHING to do with Australian legal issues - hence
aus.legal.
"Qolon" <telos@no-spam> wrote in message
news:CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam
> As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
> Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
> years, I have yesterday received a new birth certificate as change of
name.
>
> I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
> vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which
has
> been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam>.
>
> My pariticipation doesn't require his permission.
As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
years, I have on 27 July, 2003 received a new birth certificate as change of
name from Dolf Boek.
As added incentive to dissuade "Tess Adamson" <tessa@no-spam>
from making further contributes to my discussion threads, which bear no
relationship to the subject or the various discussion groups to which they
are directed, I have forwarded a copy of this message to your Internet
Service Provider at abuse@no-spam
As may by observed from the clipped message below, various indications have
been made to several newsgroups in which I have participation, that as far
psychopathic and sychophantic inidividuals such as "Tess Adamson"
<tessa@no-spam> {ie. I'm not fooled into believing that their
comments are in any way benevolent--or ever will be} are concernd, I do not
desire to receive or have necessity to receive messages from them, which
along with others serially disrupt EVERY post I make to the newsgroups--I
now have zero tolerance of them.
If they have no intention, or more important clearly lack the intellect for
participation within the subject which is capable of being inclusive of all
within the distribution list, then they should refrain from hate speech and
inciting others with their lust for anti-semitic hatred.
I send my posts to aus.legal because not only am I pursuing a claim of
religious vilification, human and Constitutional Rights violations through
the courts, but it applies to the Letter Patents which underpin the
Australian Constitution.
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4
The header of the message is as follows:
Path:
news-server.bigpond.net.au!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!ken-transit.news.tel
stra.net!news.telstra.net!news.moat.net!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!peer1.news.n
ewnet.co.uk!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.zip.com.au!
spool01.syd.optusnet.com.au!spool.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.religion.islam,aus.religion.judaism,
aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.legal,aus.general
References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
<3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
<CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.164.58.86
X-Trace: 1056790929 30819 203.164.58.86
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23087
aus.religion.christian:89225 aus.religion.islam:24973
aus.religion.judaism:7183 aus.politics:551451 soc.culture.australian:143252
aus.legal:58036 aus.general:96827
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.religion.islam,aus.religion.judaism,
aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.legal,aus.general
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 6:59 PM
Stop the spamming to aus.legal Qolon or Dolk or whatever you call youself.
This message has NOTHING to do with Australian legal issues - hence
aus.legal.
"Qolon" <telos@no-spam> wrote in message
news:CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam
> As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
> Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
> years, I have yesterday received a new birth certificate as change of
name.
>
> I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
> vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which
has
> been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam>.
>
> My pariticipation doesn't require his permission.
Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse, for continual bullying and spamming
tactics.
As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
years, I have on 27 July, 2003 received a new birth certificate as change of
name from Dolf Boek.
As added incentive to dissuade "Tess Adamson" <tessa@no-spam>
from making further contributes to my discussion threads, which bear no
relationship to the subject or the various discussion groups to which they
are directed, I have forwarded a copy of this message to your Internet
Service Provider at abuse@no-spam
And all subsequent correspondence will be directed to the same location.
Various indications have been made to several newsgroups in which I have
participation, that as far psychopathic and sychophantic inidividuals such
as "Tess Adamson" <tessa@no-spam> {ie. I'm not fooled into
believing that their comments are in any way benevolent--or ever will be}
are concernd, I do not desire to receive or have necessity to receive
messages from them, which along with others serially disrupt EVERY post I
make to the newsgroups--I now have zero tolerance of them.
If they have no intention, or more important clearly lack the intellect for
participation within the subject which is capable of being inclusive of all
within the distribution list, then they should refrain from hate speech and
inciting others with their lust for anti-semitic hatred.
I send my posts to aus.legal because not only am I pursuing a claim of
religious vilification, human and Constitutional Rights violations through
the courts, but it applies to the Letter Patents which underpin the
Australian Constitution.
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4
The header of the message is as follows:
Path:
news-server.bigpond.net.au!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!ken-transit.news.tel
stra.net!news.telstra.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!ne
ws.stealth.net
news.stealth.net!news.stealth.net!newsfeed.zip.com.au!spool01.syd.optusnet.c
om.au!spool.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.religion.islam,aus.religion.judaism,
aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.legal,aus.general
References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
<3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
<CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
<3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
<eedLa.946$l83.9084@no-spam>
the World!}
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.164.107.189
X-Trace: 1056855891 31278 203.164.107.189
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23104
aus.religion.christian:89264 aus.religion.islam:25012
aus.religion.judaism:7193 aus.politics:551678 soc.culture.australian:143316
aus.legal:58077 aus.general:96861
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.religion.islam,aus.religion.judaism,
aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.legal,aus.general
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 1:02 PM
the World!}
Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse, for continual bullying and spamming
tactics.
Tess Adamson <tessa@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam
> Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote
> Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse,
> for continual bullying and spamming tactics.
You've just fessed up to having committed a federal crime under
the federal crimes act. Your ISP may not be too thrilled about that.
You're always welcome to killfile anyone you dont choose to read.
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:23:38 +0800
The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to the ISP
of every person who doesn't agree with him. So as far as I'm
concerned anyone else has the right to do exactly the same
to him. And he IS spamming, which is against his ISP's AUP,
and he IS initiating crossposted threads to non-related
newsgroups in a very big way, which is also against his
ISP's AUP, and he HAS continuously made slanderous comments
about other parties (not the least of which was accusing AXA
Australia of perjury) which is also against his ISP's AUP.
He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough to
give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine. I say good
on Tess for making a complaint, the loser shouldn't think
he's the only one with the ability to do so, and she wont be
the only one complaining about him.
I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation
fan (and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel)
and also likes to make vexacious complaints against other
people to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all
about him.
Perhaps when his own tactics are used against him he might
think twice next time. But then again, maybe not. Telstra
(which is strange for the company running the
telecommunication infrastructure of this country) don't seem
to care about breaches of their AUP and ignore all
complaints as far as I've seen. My ISP actually bothered to
chase up Dolf's complaints but dropped them after I
explained the nature of Dolf, obviously they actually back
their AUP (and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we
wouldn't have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our
newsgroups), Telstra don't seem to.
Rod Speed wrote:
> Tess Adamson <tessa@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam
>
>>Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote
>
>
>>Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse,
>>for continual bullying and spamming tactics.
>
>
> You've just fessed up to having committed a federal crime under
> the federal crimes act. Your ISP may not be too thrilled about that.
>
> You're always welcome to killfile anyone you dont choose to read.
>
>
As a former member of the Victoria Police who experienced the epi-centre of
the Russell Street Police Centre Bombing of 1986, my public conduct on the
Internet with regards to responding and negating issues of religious
fundamentalism and extremism which give rise to acts of terrorism such as
September 11, 2001 and Bali of October 12, 2002 has been entirely
appropriate--It is a true claim that I make in my post concerning:
1) Mr. George W. Bush as President of the United States of America,
acknowledgement by publicly commenting within the news media concerning
Wednesday 19 September, 2001 as actions with which I'm associated.
2) I am aware that Adolf Hitler may also have attempted to deploy this
architecture {ie. HRUMACHIS as the key to the cypher change and the name of
Akhenaten's High Priest} as his attempts to annihilate the Jews.
As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
years, I have on 27 July, 2003 received a new birth certificate as change of
name from Dolf Boek.
I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which has
been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> and "Rod Speed"
<rod_speed@no-spam> as miscreates seem to empathise with such ideology as
expressed in para (2) above--There is no evidence by their Internet
contributions that they are committed to making the world a better and
kinder place.
As an added incentive to dissuade him from making further unwanted
contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this repsonse to his
Internet Service Provider: abuse@no-spam
It is the fact that this individual, along with others have made my 18+
years of HIV status such public property, that I will no longer be able to
work again--there is just simply too much prejudice within the workplace.
Various indications have been made to several newsgroups in which I have
participation, that as far a psychopathic and sychophantic inidividuals such
as Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> {ie. Don't be fooled into believing that
their comments are in any way benevolent--they never have been} are concernd
that I do not desire to receive or have necessity to receive messages from
them, which along with others serially disrupt EVERY post I make to the
newsgroups--I now have zero tolerance of them.
If they have no intention of participation within the subject which is
capable of being inclusive of all within the distribution list, then they
should refrain from hate speech. I therefore wish to lodge a complaint of
harassment, which cannot be within the terms and conditions of the uses
Internet Service Provider Agreement to which I am bound as much as they.
I think it time to terminate his account as my conduct is within acceptable
parameters and I should not have to be subject to this every day.
The header of the message is as follows:
Message-ID: <3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
the World!}
References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
<3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
<CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
<3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
<eedLa.946$l83.9084@no-spam>
<3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam>
<bdlopd$u8nie$1@no-spam>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.33.247.8
X-Trace: funnel.arach.net.au 1056878621 203.33.247.8 (29 Jun 2003 17:23:41
+0800)
Lines: 56
Path:
news-server.bigpond.net.au!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!new
sfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.xtra.co.nz!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.u
wa.edu.au!nntp.waia.asn.au!203.30.44.11.MISMATCH!funnel.arach.net.au!not-for
-mail
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23115
aus.religion.christian:89282 aus.politics:551780
soc.culture.australian:143386 aus.legal:58100 aus.general:96892
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:23 PM
the World!}
The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to the ISP
of every person who doesn't agree with him. So as far as I'm
concerned anyone else has the right to do exactly the same
to him. And he IS spamming, which is against his ISP's AUP,
and he IS initiating crossposted threads to non-related
newsgroups in a very big way, which is also against his
ISP's AUP, and he HAS continuously made slanderous comments
about other parties (not the least of which was accusing AXA
Australia of perjury) which is also against his ISP's AUP.
He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough to
give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine. I say good
on Tess for making a complaint, the loser shouldn't think
he's the only one with the ability to do so, and she wont be
the only one complaining about him.
I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation
fan (and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel)
and also likes to make vexacious complaints against other
people to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all
about him.
Perhaps when his own tactics are used against him he might
think twice next time. But then again, maybe not. Telstra
(which is strange for the company running the
telecommunication infrastructure of this country) don't seem
to care about breaches of their AUP and ignore all
complaints as far as I've seen. My ISP actually bothered to
chase up Dolf's complaints but dropped them after I
explained the nature of Dolf, obviously they actually back
their AUP (and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we
wouldn't have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our
newsgroups), Telstra don't seem to.
Rod Speed wrote:
> Tess Adamson <tessa@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam
>
>>Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote
>
>
>>Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse,
>>for continual bullying and spamming tactics.
>
>
> You've just fessed up to having committed a federal crime under
> the federal crimes act. Your ISP may not be too thrilled about that.
>
> You're always welcome to killfile anyone you dont choose to read.
>
>
Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam
> The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to
> the ISP of every person who doesn't agree with him.
Lie.
> So as far as I'm concerned anyone else
> has the right to do exactly the same to him.
Pity about what the federal crimes act has to say about that.
> And he IS spamming,
Nope.
> which is against his ISP's AUP,
Lie.
> and he IS initiating crossposted threads to
> non-related newsgroups in a very big way,
Doesnt happen to be illegal.
> which is also against his ISP's AUP,
Lie.
> and he HAS continuously made slanderous
> comments about other parties
Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinions,
terminally stupid tho they may well be.
> (not the least of which was accusing AXA Australia of perjury)
Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinion,
terminally stupid tho it may well be.
> which is also against his ISP's AUP.
Soorree, our constitution guarantees free speach.
You get to like that or lump that.
> He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
> enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough
> to give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine.
Your ISP may well have a problem with your federal crimes.
> I say good on Tess for making a complaint, the loser
> shouldn't think he's the only one with the ability to do so,
> and she wont be the only one complaining about him.
Her ISP may well have a problem with her federal crimes.
> I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
> but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
> but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation fan
Litigation terminal fruit loop, actually.
> (and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel) and
> also likes to make vexacious complaints against other people
> to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all about him.
Pity thats a federal crime which your ISP may well have a problem with.
> Perhaps when his own tactics are used
> against him he might think twice next time.
In your pathetic little drug crazed dreams.
> But then again, maybe not.
Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's
completely out of his fucking tree, and absolutely
classic example of AIDS induced insanity.
> Telstra (which is strange for the company running
> the telecommunication infrastructure of this country)
> don't seem to care about breaches of their AUP
They do understand the law on that stuff.
They know that that stuff in their AUP is pure
bluff that only works with the legally pig ignorant.
If they took any action they would be getting involved
in a federal crime. Even Telstra aint THAT stupid.
> and ignore all complaints as far as I've seen.
Yep, as they should.
> My ISP actually bothered to chase up Dolf's complaints
Obviously legally pig ignorant...
> but dropped them after I explained the nature
> of Dolf, obviously they actually back their AUP
One of these days they're gunna try it with someone
who does understand the law and they're gunna end
up with their arse in a sling, very spectacularly indeed.
> (and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we wouldn't
> have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our newsgroups),
You're always welcome to use a killfile so
you never see what you dont care to read.
> Telstra don't seem to.
Because they understand the legal basics, even if your ISP doesnt.
There's a reason Telstra has entire floors stuffed with legals.
> Rod Speed wrote:
> > Tess Adamson <tessa@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam
> >
> >>Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote
> >
> >
> >>Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse,
> >>for continual bullying and spamming tactics.
> >
> >
> > You've just fessed up to having committed a federal crime under
> > the federal crimes act. Your ISP may not be too thrilled about that.
> >
> > You're always welcome to killfile anyone you dont choose to read.
> >
> >
>
As a former member of the Victoria Police who experienced the epi-centre of
the Russell Street Police Centre Bombing of 1986, my public conduct on the
Internet with regards to responding and negating issues of religious
fundamentalism and extremism which give rise to acts of terrorism such as
September 11, 2001 and Bali of October 12, 2002 has been entirely
appropriate--It is a true claim that I make in my post concerning:
1) Mr. George W. Bush as President of the United States of America,
acknowledgement by publicly commenting within the news media concerning
Wednesday 19 September, 2001 as actions with which I'm associated.
2) I am aware that Adolf Hitler may also have attempted to deploy this
architecture {ie. HRUMACHIS as the key to the cypher change and the name of
Akhenaten's High Priest} as his attempts to annihilate the Jews.
As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
years, I have on 27 July, 2003 received a new birth certificate as change of
name from Dolf Boek.
I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which has
been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> and "Rod Speed"
<rod_speed@no-spam> as miscreates seem to empathise with such ideology as
expressed in para (2) above--There is no evidence by their Internet
contributions that they are committed to making the world a better and
kinder place.
As an added incentive to dissuade him from making further unwanted
contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this repsonse to his
Internet Service Provider: bigpond.net.au
It is the fact that this individual, along with others have made my 18+
years of HIV status such public property, that I will no longer be able to
work again--there is just simply too much prejudice within the workplace:
This statementa made by <rod_speed@no-spam> is defamatory, harassment and
in breach of the terms and conditions of his Internet Service Agreement:
"Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's completely out of his
fucking tree, and absolutely
classic example of AIDS induced insanity."
Various indications have been made to several newsgroups in which I have
participation, that as far a psychopathic and sychophantic inidividuals such
as Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> {ie. Don't be fooled into believing that
their comments are in any way benevolent--they never have been} are concernd
that I do not desire to receive or have necessity to receive messages from
them, which along with others serially disrupt EVERY post I make to the
newsgroups--I now have zero tolerance of them.
If they have no intention of participation within the subject which is
capable of being inclusive of all within the distribution list, then they
should refrain from hate speech. I therefore wish to lodge a complaint of
harassment, which cannot be within the terms and conditions of the uses
Internet Service Provider Agreement to which I am bound as much as they.
I think it time to terminate his account as my conduct is within acceptable
parameters and I should not have to be subject to this every day.
The header of the message is as follows:
Path:
news-server.bigpond.net.au!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!fu-
berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!cpe-203-51-40-157.nsw.bigpond.net.AU!not-for-mail
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
the World!}
Lines: 143
Message-ID: <bdmd95$ts2un$1@no-spam>
References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
<3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
<CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
<3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
<eedLa.946$l83.9084@no-spam>
<3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam>
<bdlopd$u8nie$1@no-spam> <3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-203-51-40-157.nsw.bigpond.net.au (203.51.40.157)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1056880742 31329239 203.51.40.157 (16 [69072])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23117
aus.religion.christian:89284 aus.politics:551797
soc.culture.australian:143390 aus.legal:58106 aus.general:96895
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:59 PM
the World!}
Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam
> The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to
> the ISP of every person who doesn't agree with him.
Lie.
> So as far as I'm concerned anyone else
> has the right to do exactly the same to him.
Pity about what the federal crimes act has to say about that.
> And he IS spamming,
Nope.
> which is against his ISP's AUP,
Lie.
> and he IS initiating crossposted threads to
> non-related newsgroups in a very big way,
Doesnt happen to be illegal.
> which is also against his ISP's AUP,
Lie.
> and he HAS continuously made slanderous
> comments about other parties
Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinions,
terminally stupid tho they may well be.
> (not the least of which was accusing AXA Australia of perjury)
Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinion,
terminally stupid tho it may well be.
> which is also against his ISP's AUP.
Soorree, our constitution guarantees free speach.
You get to like that or lump that.
> He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
> enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough
> to give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine.
Your ISP may well have a problem with your federal crimes.
> I say good on Tess for making a complaint, the loser
> shouldn't think he's the only one with the ability to do so,
> and she wont be the only one complaining about him.
Her ISP may well have a problem with her federal crimes.
> I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
> but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
> but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation fan
Litigation terminal fruit loop, actually.
> (and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel) and
> also likes to make vexacious complaints against other people
> to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all about him.
Pity thats a federal crime which your ISP may well have a problem with.
> Perhaps when his own tactics are used
> against him he might think twice next time.
In your pathetic little drug crazed dreams.
> But then again, maybe not.
Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's
completely out of his fucking tree, and absolutely
classic example of AIDS induced insanity.
> Telstra (which is strange for the company running
> the telecommunication infrastructure of this country)
> don't seem to care about breaches of their AUP
They do understand the law on that stuff.
They know that that stuff in their AUP is pure
bluff that only works with the legally pig ignorant.
If they took any action they would be getting involved
in a federal crime. Even Telstra aint THAT stupid.
> and ignore all complaints as far as I've seen.
Yep, as they should.
> My ISP actually bothered to chase up Dolf's complaints
Obviously legally pig ignorant...
> but dropped them after I explained the nature
> of Dolf, obviously they actually back their AUP
One of these days they're gunna try it with someone
who does understand the law and they're gunna end
up with their arse in a sling, very spectacularly indeed.
> (and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we wouldn't
> have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our newsgroups),
You're always welcome to use a killfile so
you never see what you dont care to read.
> Telstra don't seem to.
Because they understand the legal basics, even if your ISP doesnt.
There's a reason Telstra has entire floors stuffed with legals.
> Rod Speed wrote:
> > Tess Adamson <tessa@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam
> >
> >>Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote
> >
> >
> >>Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse,
> >>for continual bullying and spamming tactics.
> >
> >
> > You've just fessed up to having committed a federal crime under
> > the federal crimes act. Your ISP may not be too thrilled about that.
> >
> > You're always welcome to killfile anyone you dont choose to read.
> >
> >
>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:03:22 +0800
You're just making a clown of yourself dolf, unlike yourself
I'm acting well within the AUP of my ISP. You on the other
hand are not, and as it seems more and more people are
complaining to Telstra about you they may eventually get off
their hands and get rid of you. And then we'll only have
strider to contend with, and what a shame that'll be. Night
night dolf. 8]
Qolon wrote:
> As a former member of the Victoria Police who experienced the epi-centre of
> the Russell Street Police Centre Bombing of 1986, my public conduct on the
> Internet with regards to responding and negating issues of religious
> fundamentalism and extremism which give rise to acts of terrorism such as
> September 11, 2001 and Bali of October 12, 2002 has been entirely
> appropriate--It is a true claim that I make in my post concerning:
>
> 1) Mr. George W. Bush as President of the United States of America,
> acknowledgement by publicly commenting within the news media concerning
> Wednesday 19 September, 2001 as actions with which I'm associated.
> 2) I am aware that Adolf Hitler may also have attempted to deploy this
> architecture {ie. HRUMACHIS as the key to the cypher change and the name of
> Akhenaten's High Priest} as his attempts to annihilate the Jews.
>
> As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
> Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
> years, I have on 27 July, 2003 received a new birth certificate as change of
> name from Dolf Boek.
>
> I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
> vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which has
> been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> and "Rod Speed"
> <rod_speed@no-spam> as miscreates seem to empathise with such ideology as
> expressed in para (2) above--There is no evidence by their Internet
> contributions that they are committed to making the world a better and
> kinder place.
>
> As an added incentive to dissuade him from making further unwanted
> contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this repsonse to his
> Internet Service Provider: abuse@no-spam
>
> It is the fact that this individual, along with others have made my 18+
> years of HIV status such public property, that I will no longer be able to
> work again--there is just simply too much prejudice within the workplace.
>
> Various indications have been made to several newsgroups in which I have
> participation, that as far a psychopathic and sychophantic inidividuals such
> as Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> {ie. Don't be fooled into believing that
> their comments are in any way benevolent--they never have been} are concernd
> that I do not desire to receive or have necessity to receive messages from
> them, which along with others serially disrupt EVERY post I make to the
> newsgroups--I now have zero tolerance of them.
>
> If they have no intention of participation within the subject which is
> capable of being inclusive of all within the distribution list, then they
> should refrain from hate speech. I therefore wish to lodge a complaint of
> harassment, which cannot be within the terms and conditions of the uses
> Internet Service Provider Agreement to which I am bound as much as they.
>
> I think it time to terminate his account as my conduct is within acceptable
> parameters and I should not have to be subject to this every day.
>
> The header of the message is as follows:
>
> Message-ID: <3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam>
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:23:38 +0800
> From: Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
> Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Newsgroups:
> aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
> legal,aus.general
> Subject: Re: Misuse Report; Continued Harassment {Fw: - On the Creation of
> the World!}
> References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
> <3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
> <CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
> <3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
> <eedLa.946$l83.9084@no-spam>
> <3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam>
> <bdlopd$u8nie$1@no-spam>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.33.247.8
> X-Trace: funnel.arach.net.au 1056878621 203.33.247.8 (29 Jun 2003 17:23:41
> +0800)
> Lines: 56
> Path:
> news-server.bigpond.net.au!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!new
> sfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.xtra.co.nz!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.u
> wa.edu.au!nntp.waia.asn.au!203.30.44.11.MISMATCH!funnel.arach.net.au!not-for
> -mail
> Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23115
> aus.religion.christian:89282 aus.politics:551780
> soc.culture.australian:143386 aus.legal:58100 aus.general:96892
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam>
> Newsgroups:
> aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
> legal,aus.general
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Misuse Report; Continued Harassment {Fw: - On the Creation of
> the World!}
>
>
> The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to the ISP
> of every person who doesn't agree with him. So as far as I'm
> concerned anyone else has the right to do exactly the same
> to him. And he IS spamming, which is against his ISP's AUP,
> and he IS initiating crossposted threads to non-related
> newsgroups in a very big way, which is also against his
> ISP's AUP, and he HAS continuously made slanderous comments
> about other parties (not the least of which was accusing AXA
> Australia of perjury) which is also against his ISP's AUP.
>
> He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
> enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough to
> give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine. I say good
> on Tess for making a complaint, the loser shouldn't think
> he's the only one with the ability to do so, and she wont be
> the only one complaining about him.
>
> I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
> but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
> but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation
> fan (and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel)
> and also likes to make vexacious complaints against other
> people to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all
> about him.
>
> Perhaps when his own tactics are used against him he might
> think twice next time. But then again, maybe not. Telstra
> (which is strange for the company running the
> telecommunication infrastructure of this country) don't seem
> to care about breaches of their AUP and ignore all
> complaints as far as I've seen. My ISP actually bothered to
> chase up Dolf's complaints but dropped them after I
> explained the nature of Dolf, obviously they actually back
> their AUP (and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we
> wouldn't have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our
> newsgroups), Telstra don't seem to.
>
>
> Rod Speed wrote:
>
>>Tess Adamson <tessa@no-spam> wrote in message
>>news:3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam
>>
>>
>>>Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote
>>
>>
>>>Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse,
>>>for continual bullying and spamming tactics.
>>
>>
>>You've just fessed up to having committed a federal crime under
>>the federal crimes act. Your ISP may not be too thrilled about that.
>>
>>You're always welcome to killfile anyone you dont choose to read.
>>
>>
>
>
>
As may be observed from "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@no-spam> independent
comments below, he completely refutes the accusations publicly made by
"Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam>.
I shall continue forward copies of my objections to their characterisations,
until my complaint of religious vilification, human and constitutional
rights violations against the Mark Capecchi, Peter Riddell as former
employees and representatives of AXA Global (Australia) Group Insurance, the
Victoria Police and Diane Sisley as Chief Executive Officer of the Equal
Opportunity and Human Rights Commission are more adequately dealt with by a
court of law, rather than by a visully impaired judicatory with such a
narrow and constrained worldview as to be a mockery of justice.
As a former member of the Victoria Police who experienced the epi-centre of
the Russell Street Police Centre Bombing of 1986, my public conduct on the
Internet with regards to responding and negating issues of religious
fundamentalism and extremism which give rise to acts of terrorism such as
September 11, 2001 and Bali of October 12, 2002 has been entirely
appropriate--It is a true claim that I make in my post concerning:
1) Mr. George W. Bush as President of the United States of America,
acknowledgement by publicly commenting within the news media concerning
Wednesday 19 September, 2001 as actions with which I'm associated.
2) I am aware that Adolf Hitler may also have attempted to deploy this
architecture {ie. HRUMACHIS as the key to the cypher change and the name of
Akhenaten's High Priest} as his attempts to annihilate the Jews.
As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
years, I have on 27 July, 2003 received a new birth certificate as change of
name from Dolf Boek.
I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which has
been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> and "Rod Speed"
<rod_speed@no-spam> as miscreates seem to empathise with such ideology as
expressed in para (2) above--There is no evidence by their Internet
contributions that they are committed to making the world a better and
kinder place.
As an added incentive to dissuade him from making further unwanted
contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this repsonse to his
Internet Service Provider: abuse@no-spam
It is the fact that this individual, along with others have made my 18+
years of HIV status such public property, that I will no longer be able to
work again--there is just simply too much prejudice within the workplace:
This statementa made by <rod_speed@no-spam> is defamatory, harassment and
in breach of the terms and conditions of his Internet Service Agreement:
"Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's completely out of his
fucking tree, and absolutely classic example of AIDS induced insanity."
Various indications have been made to several newsgroups in which I have
participation, that as far a psychopathic and sychophantic inidividuals such
as Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> {ie. Don't be fooled into believing that
their comments are in any way benevolent--they never have been} are concernd
that I do not desire to receive or have necessity to receive messages from
them, which along with others serially disrupt EVERY post I make to the
newsgroups--I now have zero tolerance of them.
If they have no intention of participation within the subject which is
capable of being inclusive of all within the distribution list, then they
should refrain from hate speech. I therefore wish to lodge a complaint of
harassment, which cannot be within the terms and conditions of the uses
Internet Service Provider Agreement to which I am bound as much as they.
I think it time to terminate his account as my conduct is within acceptable
parameters and I should not have to be subject to this every day.
The header of the message is as follows:
Message-ID: <3EFED58A.2020700@no-spam>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
the World!}
References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
<3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
<CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
<3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
<eedLa.946$l83.9084@no-spam>
<3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam>
<bdlopd$u8nie$1@no-spam> <3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam>
<WDyLa.580$mq3.8192@no-spam>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.33.247.8
X-Trace: funnel.arach.net.au 1056888207 203.33.247.8 (29 Jun 2003 20:03:27
+0800)
Lines: 169
Path:
news-server.bigpond.net.au!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!tis
cali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com
!216.166.71.118.MISMATCH!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.gig
anews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.uwa.edu.au!nntp.wa
ia.asn.au!203.30.44.11.MISMATCH!funnel.arach.net.au!not-for-mail
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23120
aus.religion.christian:89288 aus.politics:551847
soc.culture.australian:143403 aus.legal:58109 aus.general:96905
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 10:03 PM
the World!}
You're just making a clown of yourself dolf, unlike yourself
I'm acting well within the AUP of my ISP. You on the other
hand are not, and as it seems more and more people are
complaining to Telstra about you they may eventually get off
their hands and get rid of you. And then we'll only have
strider to contend with, and what a shame that'll be. Night
night dolf. 8]
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:59 PM
the World!}
Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam
> The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to
> the ISP of every person who doesn't agree with him.
Lie.
> So as far as I'm concerned anyone else
> has the right to do exactly the same to him.
Pity about what the federal crimes act has to say about that.
> And he IS spamming,
Nope.
> which is against his ISP's AUP,
Lie.
> and he IS initiating crossposted threads to
> non-related newsgroups in a very big way,
Doesnt happen to be illegal.
> which is also against his ISP's AUP,
Lie.
> and he HAS continuously made slanderous
> comments about other parties
Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinions,
terminally stupid tho they may well be.
> (not the least of which was accusing AXA Australia of perjury)
Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinion,
terminally stupid tho it may well be.
> which is also against his ISP's AUP.
Soorree, our constitution guarantees free speach.
You get to like that or lump that.
> He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
> enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough
> to give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine.
Your ISP may well have a problem with your federal crimes.
> I say good on Tess for making a complaint, the loser
> shouldn't think he's the only one with the ability to do so,
> and she wont be the only one complaining about him.
Her ISP may well have a problem with her federal crimes.
> I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
> but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
> but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation fan
Litigation terminal fruit loop, actually.
> (and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel) and
> also likes to make vexacious complaints against other people
> to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all about him.
Pity thats a federal crime which your ISP may well have a problem with.
> Perhaps when his own tactics are used
> against him he might think twice next time.
In your pathetic little drug crazed dreams.
> But then again, maybe not.
Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's
completely out of his fucking tree, and absolutely
classic example of AIDS induced insanity.
> Telstra (which is strange for the company running
> the telecommunication infrastructure of this country)
> don't seem to care about breaches of their AUP
They do understand the law on that stuff.
They know that that stuff in their AUP is pure
bluff that only works with the legally pig ignorant.
If they took any action they would be getting involved
in a federal crime. Even Telstra aint THAT stupid.
> and ignore all complaints as far as I've seen.
Yep, as they should.
> My ISP actually bothered to chase up Dolf's complaints
Obviously legally pig ignorant...
> but dropped them after I explained the nature
> of Dolf, obviously they actually back their AUP
One of these days they're gunna try it with someone
who does understand the law and they're gunna end
up with their arse in a sling, very spectacularly indeed.
> (and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we wouldn't
> have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our newsgroups),
You're always welcome to use a killfile so
you never see what you dont care to read.
> Telstra don't seem to.
Because they understand the legal basics, even if your ISP doesnt.
There's a reason Telstra has entire floors stuffed with legals.
> Rod Speed wrote:
> > Tess Adamson <tessa@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam
> >
> >>Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote
> >
> >
> >>Your message forwarded to Telstra abuse,
> >>for continual bullying and spamming tactics.
> >
> >
> > You've just fessed up to having committed a federal crime under
> > the federal crimes act. Your ISP may not be too thrilled about that.
> >
> > You're always welcome to killfile anyone you dont choose to read.
> >
> >
>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 04:04:17 +0800
Qolon wrote:
<blah blah blah blah blah, most ranting mercifully snipped>
> I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
> vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which has
> been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> and "Rod Speed"
> <rod_speed@no-spam> as miscreates seem to empathise with such ideology as
> expressed in para (2) above--There is no evidence by their Internet
> contributions that they are committed to making the world a better and
> kinder place.
>
> As an added incentive to dissuade him from making further unwanted
> contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this repsonse to his
> Internet Service Provider: abuse@no-spam
Go for your life buddy, if you keep making a fool of
yourself in that manner you'll probably start getting
complaints direct from my ISP in addition to myself and
about a half dozen other SCA users to Telstra.
> It is the fact that this individual, along with others have made my 18+
> years of HIV status such public property, that I will no longer be able to
> work again--there is just simply too much prejudice within the workplace:
Thank you, a complete and blatant lie. That should come in
handy, I think they call it slander in the legal world. In
fact I didn't know that you were HIV (it doesn't seem to
shut you up though) positive until you ranted it out all
over Usenet you fool, I think that was one of those times
where you popped in and lied to everyone claiming you were
never going to post in here and bother us with your crap
again. Your memory failing as well is it?
> This statementa made by <rod_speed@no-spam> is defamatory, harassment and
> in breach of the terms and conditions of his Internet Service Agreement:
>
> "Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's completely out of his
> fucking tree, and absolutely classic example of AIDS induced insanity."
Oh, by the way Dolf, you might have realised by now, if you
rub your head really hard, that ArachNet really aren't going
to be interested in what a user from another ISP posting
from Yahoo has said to you. Perhaps you should see a reality
counsellor, because you don't seem to have much of a grip on
it (reality that is) at all.
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 04:21:26 +0800
Rod Speed wrote:
> Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam
>
>
>>The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to
>>the ISP of every person who doesn't agree with him.
>
>
> Lie.
Oh really??? Just for example he's done the same with this
very post I'm replying to, and every other post not agreeing
with him in this thread. Seems you didn't have a good look
before you leaped on that one.
>>So as far as I'm concerned anyone else
>>has the right to do exactly the same to him.
>
>
> Pity about what the federal crimes act has to say about that.
Uhuh.
>>And he IS spamming,
>
>
> Nope.
Yep, he is spitting his religious garbage out to as many
newsgroups (most of which his posts are not applicable to)
as he can remember how to spell, so at the very least he is
trolling, but considering he is pretty much marketing his
own self-tailored religious-views I'm happy to call it
spamming, but either way both are a pain in the arse
regardless of which you define his posts as.
>>which is against his ISP's AUP,
>
>
> Lie.
Yawn... Try reading Telstra Bigpond's AUP before you yet
again leap before thinking.
>>and he IS initiating crossposted threads to
>>non-related newsgroups in a very big way,
>
>
> Doesnt happen to be illegal.
Who said it was illegal??? It breaches his AUP however.
>>which is also against his ISP's AUP,
>
>
> Lie.
Yawn. See above.
>>and he HAS continuously made slanderous
>>comments about other parties
>
>
> Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinions,
> terminally stupid tho they may well be.
Actually that's a shadowy area, the courts are still finding
their way when it comes to the internet and many interesting
things have happened and will continue to happen in this
area. But legalities aside it breaches his AUP. He is making
multiple vexacious complaints against other users,
turn-about is fair play, and when it comes to complaining
about Dolf the complaints aren't even vexacious, they're
perfectly legitimate.
>>(not the least of which was accusing AXA Australia of perjury)
>
>
> Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinion,
> terminally stupid tho it may well be.
As most of his posts are.
>>which is also against his ISP's AUP.
>
>
> Soorree, our constitution guarantees free speach.
>
> You get to like that or lump that.
It doesn't seem to work so well then. Anti-racial
vilification laws, arrest for disorderly conduct due to
swearing, court suppression of people speaking about things,
libel/slander litigation on a daily basis. It appears that
guarantee that you speak of is very flimsy at best.
>>He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
>>enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough
>>to give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine.
>
>
> Your ISP may well have a problem with your federal crimes.
Uhuh.
>>I say good on Tess for making a complaint, the loser
>>shouldn't think he's the only one with the ability to do so,
>>and she wont be the only one complaining about him.
>
>
> Her ISP may well have a problem with her federal crimes.
Uhuh.
>>I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
>>but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
>>but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation fan
>
>
> Litigation terminal fruit loop, actually.
Agreed.
>>(and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel) and
>>also likes to make vexacious complaints against other people
>>to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all about him.
>
>
> Pity thats a federal crime which your ISP may well have a problem with.
Uhuh. They just set up those abuse accounts for fun huh?
>>Perhaps when his own tactics are used
>>against him he might think twice next time.
>
>
> In your pathetic little drug crazed dreams.
Well yes I do like my beer, not to mention coffee, but I
don't think they craze my dreams. Why, do they tend to make
you something something do they?
>>But then again, maybe not.
>
>
> Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's
> completely out of his fucking tree, and absolutely
> classic example of AIDS induced insanity.
I'm not relying on his coherence at all (because there is no
coherence there), I was hoping Telstra would just get sick
of hearing about him. But then they don't seem to give a
shit what he does.
>>Telstra (which is strange for the company running
>>the telecommunication infrastructure of this country)
>>don't seem to care about breaches of their AUP
>
>
> They do understand the law on that stuff.
>
> They know that that stuff in their AUP is pure
> bluff that only works with the legally pig ignorant.
>
> If they took any action they would be getting involved
> in a federal crime. Even Telstra aint THAT stupid.
Ok, I'll bite. "And what crime would that be?"
>>and ignore all complaints as far as I've seen.
>
>
> Yep, as they should.
>
>
>>My ISP actually bothered to chase up Dolf's complaints
>
>
> Obviously legally pig ignorant...
>
>
>>but dropped them after I explained the nature
>>of Dolf, obviously they actually back their AUP
>
>
> One of these days they're gunna try it with someone
> who does understand the law and they're gunna end
> up with their arse in a sling, very spectacularly indeed.
Funny, Telstra have done it in the past, at least to two
people I know of. They just don't seem too interested these
days.
>>(and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we wouldn't
>>have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our newsgroups),
>
>
> You're always welcome to use a killfile so
> you never see what you dont care to read.
Agreed, but that's far too technological for dolf's limited
understanding. I'd be happy to just ignore the loser, but
since he feels the need to continuously launch complaints
and legal proceedings against people I reckon throwing the
same shit back at him is fair play.
>>Telstra don't seem to.
>
>
> Because they understand the legal basics, even if your ISP doesnt.
>
> There's a reason Telstra has entire floors stuffed with legals.
Must not have stopped them with those they have taken action
against.
As an added incentive to dissuade the individual from making further
unwanted contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this response
to his Internet Service Provider: abuse@no-spam
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html
"Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f073348$1@no-spam
<snipped diatribe which being made some 7 days after the initial comments,
giving rise to the view we are responding to an individual with a
psychiatric disorder>
Header included for reference and to comply with any legal requirements:
As an added incentive to dissuade the individual from making further
unwanted contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this response
to his Internet Service Provider: abuse@no-spam
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html
"Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f072f45@no-spam
<snipped diatribe which being made some 7 days after the initial comments,
giving rise to the view we are responding to an individual with a
psychiatric disorder>
Header included for reference and to comply with any legal requirements:
Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f073348$1@no-spam
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> wrote
>>> The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to
>>> the ISP of every person who doesn't agree with him.
>> Lie.
> Oh really???
Yes, really.
> Just for example he's done the same
> with this very post I'm replying to,
Says sweet fuck all about whether he does that with
EVERY PERSON WHO DOESNT AGREE WITH HIM, stupid.
> and every other post not agreeing with him in this thread.
Says sweet fuck all about whether he does that with
EVERY PERSON WHO DOESNT AGREE WITH HIM, stupid.
> Seems you didn't have a good look
> before you leaped on that one.
Or I have managed grasp the difference between just one thread
and every single response disagreeing with a post of his, fool.
And I dont 'leap'
>>> So as far as I'm concerned anyone else
>>> has the right to do exactly the same to him.
>> Pity about what the federal crimes act has to say about that.
> Uhuh.
>>> And he IS spamming,
>> Nope.
> Yep,
Nope.
> he is spitting his religious garbage out to as many
> newsgroups (most of which his posts are not
> applicable to) as he can remember how to spell,
Doesnt qualify as SPAM, fool.
The worst it can be claimed to be is inappropriate
crossposting. Different matter entirely.
> so at the very least he is trolling,
Perfectly legal, fool. And if he believes that drivel he spews,
it aint even trolling, its just the mindless spew of an individual
with a VERY tenuous grip on its sanity. Just like with most
of the worst of the rabid religious fanatics.
> but considering he is pretty much marketing his own
> self-tailored religious-views I'm happy to call it spamming,
More fool you. Thats not what that word means.
> but either way both are a pain in the arse
> regardless of which you define his posts as.
No one is holding a gun to your head and forcing
you to read what you dont choose to read, fool.
>>> which is against his ISP's AUP,
>> Lie.
> Yawn... Try reading Telstra Bigpond's AUP
You lied about what it says, fool.
> before you yet again leap before thinking.
Even you should be able to bullshit your way out of
your predicament better than that pathetic effort, fool.
>>> and he IS initiating crossposted threads to
>>> non-related newsgroups in a very big way,
>> Doesnt happen to be illegal.
> Who said it was illegal??? It breaches his AUP however.
No AUP gets any say what so ever on what isnt illegal.
>>> which is also against his ISP's AUP,
>> Lie.
> Yawn. See above.
Completely useless, as always with your drivel.
>>> and he HAS continuously made slanderous
>>> comments about other parties
>> Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinions,
>> terminally stupid tho they may well be.
> Actually that's a shadowy area,
Wrong. As always.
> the courts are still finding their way when it comes
> to the internet and many interesting things have
> happened and will continue to happen in this area.
Mindless waffle. Everyone is entitled to their opinion on that stuff.
> But legalities aside it breaches his AUP.
Lie.
> He is making multiple vexacious complaints against other users,
So are you.
> turn-about is fair play,
Wrong, legally.
> and when it comes to complaining about
> Dolf the complaints aren't even vexacious,
Another lie.
> they're perfectly legitimate.
Another lie. You get no say what so ever on
what is allegedly a breach of his ISP's AUP.
And you flout the federal crimes act when you
do precisely what you whine about him doing.
>>> (not the least of which was accusing AXA Australia of perjury)
>> Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinion,
>> terminally stupid tho it may well be.
> As most of his posts are.
Its perfectly legal to be terminally stupid. In spades with those who
have a VERY tenuous grip on their sanity due to their medical condition.
>>> which is also against his ISP's AUP.
>> Soorree, our constitution guarantees free speach.
>> You get to like that or lump that.
> It doesn't seem to work so well then.
Wrong. As always.
> Anti-racial vilification laws,
Which wouldnt survive a constitutional challenge.
> arrest for disorderly conduct due to swearing,
> court suppression of people speaking about
> things, libel/slander litigation on a daily basis.
You clearly aint gotta clue about what free speech is about.
> It appears that guarantee that you speak of is very flimsy at best.
You clearly aint gotta clue about what free speech is about.
>>> He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
>>> enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough
>>> to give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine.
>> Your ISP may well have a problem with your federal crimes.
> Uhuh.
And your encitement of others to flout the federal crimes act too.
>>> I say good on Tess for making a complaint, the loser
>>> shouldn't think he's the only one with the ability to do so,
>>> and she wont be the only one complaining about him.
>> Her ISP may well have a problem with her federal crimes.
> Uhuh.
>>> I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
>>> but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
>>> but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation fan
>> Litigation terminal fruit loop, actually.
> Agreed.
Not that uncommon with those with a VERY tenuous grip on their sanity.
>>> (and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel) and
>>> also likes to make vexacious complaints against other people
>>> to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all about him.
>> Pity thats a federal crime which your ISP may well have a problem with.
> Uhuh. They just set up those abuse accounts for fun huh?
Nope, for the reporting of illegal activity, stupid.
>>> Perhaps when his own tactics are used
>>> against him he might think twice next time.
>> In your pathetic little drug crazed dreams.
> Well yes I do like my beer, not to mention
> coffee, but I don't think they craze my dreams.
They obviously do.
> Why, do they tend to make you something something do they?
I wasnt the one proclaiming on that stupid line about 'think twice' fool.
If you havent even noticed that its got a VERY tenuous
grip on its sanity, and that that sort of attack is MUCH
more likely to just produce more of the same in response...
The only thing that will stop it is a padded cell with no
net access, or one of those funky canvas jackets with
extremely long sleeves and the fools in charge of those
hardly ever bother to use them anymore.
So you get to like it or lump it when terminal fruit
loops like that one post stuff you dont approve of.
>>> But then again, maybe not.
>> Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's
>> completely out of his fucking tree, and absolutely
>> classic example of AIDS induced insanity.
> I'm not relying on his coherence at all (because
> there is no coherence there), I was hoping Telstra
> would just get sick of hearing about him. But then
> they don't seem to give a shit what he does.
They are well aware of what they can do, legally.
And the TIO will rub their noses in that if they arent.
Just like your nose will inevitably be rubbed in your
criminal activitys under the federal crimes act too.
>>> Telstra (which is strange for the company running
>>> the telecommunication infrastructure of this country)
>>> don't seem to care about breaches of their AUP
>> They do understand the law on that stuff.
>> They know that that stuff in their AUP is pure
>> bluff that only works with the legally pig ignorant.
>> If they took any action they would be getting involved
>> in a federal crime. Even Telstra aint THAT stupid.
> Ok, I'll bite. "And what crime would that be?"
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca191482/s85ze.html
>>> and ignore all complaints as far as I've seen.
>> Yep, as they should.
>>> My ISP actually bothered to chase up Dolf's complaints
>> Obviously legally pig ignorant...
>>> but dropped them after I explained the nature
>>> of Dolf, obviously they actually back their AUP
>> One of these days they're gunna try it with someone
>> who does understand the law and they're gunna end
>> up with their arse in a sling, very spectacularly indeed.
> Funny, Telstra have done it in the
> past, at least to two people I know of.
And they got their nose rubbed in the law, by the TIO.
> They just don't seem too interested these days.
Because even Telstra does eventually manage
to get the basics right on whats legal eventually.
>>> (and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we wouldn't
>>> have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our newsgroups),
>> You're always welcome to use a killfile so
>> you never see what you dont care to read.
> Agreed, but that's far too technological
> for dolf's limited understanding.
You're the one that uses it fool.
> I'd be happy to just ignore the loser, but since
> he feels the need to continuously launch complaints
> and legal proceedings against people I reckon
> throwing the same shit back at him is fair play.
Pity the law doesnt.
And he can always get off by reason of his florid insanity.
You dont have that excuse available.
>>> Telstra don't seem to.
>> Because they understand the legal basics, even if your ISP doesnt.
>> There's a reason Telstra has entire floors stuffed with legals.
> Must not have stopped them with those they have taken action against.
Sure did. Thats why they aint stupid enough to try it anymore, stupid.
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@no-spam> wrote in message
news:be7iqg$23h6a$1@no-spam
Perfectly legal, fool. And if he believes that drivel he spews,
it aint even trolling, its just the mindless spew of an individual
with a VERY tenuous grip on its sanity. Just like with most
of the worst of the rabid religious fanatics.
[snipped for context]
QOLON NOTES:
No actually, there has never really been an adequate regulative
philosophical and metaphsyical thelogical study done into the origins of the
English language, its connection to the Letters Patent of Austrlia's
Constitution and Adolf Hitler's use of such a mathematical, linguistic and
psychological architecture for the 'Administration of Governemnt' to effect
the annihilation of 6+ million peoples.
With the collapse of Iraq, I own the copyright to the only alternate viable
autonomous religious model as statement of belief, thought and
conscience--All other interpretations have made only symbollic use of the
Chaldean astrological based taxonomyand are now redundant.
Susan Blackmore in 'The Meme Machine' © 1999 Oxford University Press says
that the whole "...question of language origins has been so contentious,
that as long ago as 1866 the Societe de Linguistique de Paris banned any
more speculation about the issue."
This model also maintains a consistency with the vMeme work of Chris Cowan
co-author with Psychiatrist Don Beck of "Spiral Dynamics -- Mastering
values, leadership and change" contained on the Spiral Dynamics WWW-page:
"Those who have not recently visited Dolf's work will find much new at
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos. Given the situation in
Israel/Palestine and all of the religious undercurrents in today's world,
Dolf's perspective offers yet another way to view the forces influencing
human nature." [Ref: http://www.spiraldynamics.com/news.htm ]
It is perhaps that such considerations are beyond the intellectual and
spiritual conceptions of most Australians, that you have made your
ill-formed comments above.
As a former member of the Victoria Police who experienced the epi-centre of
the Russell Street, Melbourne Police Centre Bombing of 1986, my public
conduct on the Internet has been to respond, negate, tanquilize and if
necessary vapourise issues of religious fundamentalism and extremism which
give rise to acts of terrorism such as September 11, 2001 and Bali of
October 12, 2002.
I often wonder whether the narrow world views and lack of responsible public
action conveyed by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam>, has contributed to the
loss of life in Bali.
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4
By the way, there is nothing restraining you from proffering a public
apology--I'm expecting one!
- Qolon
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@no-spam> wrote in message
news:be7iqg$23h6a$1@no-spam
Perfectly legal, fool. And if he believes that drivel he spews,
it aint even trolling, its just the mindless spew of an individual
with a VERY tenuous grip on its sanity. Just like with most
of the worst of the rabid religious fanatics.
[snipped for context]
QOLON NOTES:
No actually, there has never really been an adequate regulative
philosophical and metaphsyical theological study done into the origins of
the English language, its connection to the Letters Patent of Australia's
Constitution and Adolf Hitler's use of such a mathematical, linguistic and
psychological architecture for the 'Administration of Government' to effect
the annihilation of 6+ million peoples.
With the collapse of Iraq, I own the copyright to the only alternate viable
autonomous religious model as statement of belief, thought and
conscience--All other interpretations have made only symbollic use of the
Chaldean astrological based taxonomy view and are now redundant.
Susan Blackmore in 'The Meme Machine' © 1999 Oxford University Press says
that the whole "...question of language origins has been so contentious,
that as long ago as 1866 the Societe de Linguistique de Paris banned any
more speculation about the issue."
This model also maintains a consistency with the vMeme work of Chris Cowan
co-author with Psychiatrist Don Beck of "Spiral Dynamics -- Mastering
values, leadership and change" contained on the Spiral Dynamics WWW-page:
"Those who have not recently visited Dolf's work will find much new at
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos. Given the situation in
Israel/Palestine and all of the religious undercurrents in today's world,
Dolf's perspective offers yet another way to view the forces influencing
human nature." [Ref: http://www.spiraldynamics.com/news.htm ]
It is perhaps that such considerations are beyond the intellectual and
spiritual conceptions of most Australians, that you have made your
ill-formed comments above.
As a former member of the Victoria Police who experienced the epi-centre of
the Russell Street, Melbourne Police Centre Bombing of 1986, my public
conduct on the Internet has been to respond, negate, tanquilize and if
necessary vapourise issues of religious fundamentalism and extremism which
give rise to acts of terrorism such as September 11, 2001 and Bali of
October 12, 2002.
I often wonder whether the narrow world views and lack of responsible public
action conveyed by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam>, has contributed to the
loss of life in Bali.
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4
Header for Information as Follows:
Path:
news-server.bigpond.net.au!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!tis
cali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!news100.image.dk!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!sma
ll.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!m075-039.nv.iinet.net.AU!not-for-
mail
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
the World!}
Lines: 337
Message-ID: <be7iqg$23h6a$1@no-spam>
References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
<3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
<CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
<3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
<eedLa.946$l83.9084@no-spam>
<3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam>
<bdlopd$u8nie$1@no-spam> <3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam>
<bdmd95$ts2un$1@no-spam> <3f073348$1@no-spam>
NNTP-Posting-Host: m075-039.nv.iinet.net.au (203.217.75.39)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1057443475 2213066 203.217.75.39 (16 [69072])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23345
aus.religion.christian:89720 aus.politics:554594
soc.culture.australian:144203 aus.legal:58347 aus.general:97319
Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote in message
news:F6JNa.50$pg6.4228@no-spam
> By the way, there is nothing restraining
> you from proffering a public apology
Corse there is, I dont feel like doing that, fruit loop.
> --I'm expecting one!
You can expect santa to deliver you another
blow up doll if you like. About as likely.
<reams of completely superfluous proof that its
completely out of its tree flushed where it belongs>
This is a complaint of Misuse, Slanderous Characterisations and Continued
Public Harasmment by "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@no-spam>.
As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
years, I have on 27 July, 2003 received a new birth certificate as change of
name from Dolf Boek.
I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which has
been promulgated by "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@no-spam> as a miscreate--There
is no evidence by their Internet contributions that they are committed to
making the world a better and kinder place.
As an added incentive to dissuade him from making further unwanted
contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this response to his
respective Internet Service Provider: abuse@no-spam abuse@no-spam
Given these past experiences of individual & institutional religious-values
based slander (much of it public) has in the instance of a diseased state,
resulted in loss of autonomy, famility bonds, long term relationships,
employment opportunities and societal excoriation, I begin to wonder why I
have to put up with it day after day--I have every intention of seeking to
make retrospective legal claims against the individuals such
<rod_speed@no-spam> for the public acts of vilification perpetuated and
which have the potential for a long life on the Internet.
Accordingly the Header of the offending post is as follows:
Path:
news-server.bigpond.net.au!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!fu-
berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!m075-039.nv.iinet.net.AU!not-for-mail
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
the World!}
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <be7ov9$235pi$1@no-spam>
References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
<3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
<CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
<3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
<eedLa.946$l83.9084@no-spam>
<3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam>
<bdlopd$u8nie$1@no-spam> <3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam>
<bdmd95$ts2un$1@no-spam> <3f073348$1@no-spam>
<be7iqg$23h6a$1@no-spam>
<F6JNa.50$pg6.4228@no-spam>
NNTP-Posting-Host: m075-039.nv.iinet.net.au (203.217.75.39)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1057449770 2201394 203.217.75.39 (16 [69072])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23350
aus.religion.christian:89725 aus.politics:554625
soc.culture.australian:144217 aus.legal:58352 aus.general:97331
I have also this past weekm sought access to the telephone transcripts of a
7 December, 2001 hearing and awarding of costs against myself following AXA
Global (Australia) Group Insurance's extra-ordinary application and
accompanying factitious, slanderous and malicious characterisations as
telephone testimony made by Mr. Peter Riddell, then Legal Counsel for the
Insurer.
The Insurer has on 12 May, 2003 been advied by letter, of my intention to
seek a review and over-ruling of a 7 December, 2001 Victoria Civil &
Adminstrative Tribunal (VCAT) decision to a strikeout of the the matter
A500/2000 and desire to further pursue a claim of costs, expenses, loss,
inconvenience and embarassment for the life impugnity applied in the
circumstances as a claim to religious values based persecution, human and
Constitutional Rights violations.
It is my view that the presiding VCAT member, madam deputy presidient Cate
MacKenzie's lack of faculty as visual impairment, makes it impossible for
he, by nature, to be cognisant of the evidence as presented {ie. the
colorised mathematical and chronological model hosted on my WWW-page viz
Letters Patent http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html
and vKabbalah JavaScript Class for Microsoft Internet Explorer Vsn 6.0
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/vkabbalah.html }, as my
solitary Internet based religious and political activity within
Superannuated Retirement.
There has never really been an adequate regulative philosophical and
metaphsyical theological study done into the origins of
the English language, its connection to the Letters Patent of Australia's
Constitution and Adolf Hitler's use of such a mathematical, linguistic and
psychological architecture for the 'Administration of Government' to effect
the annihilation of 6+ million peoples.
With the collapse of Iraq, I own the copyright to the only alternate viable
autonomous religious model as statement of belief, thought and
conscience--All other interpretations have made only symbollic use of the
Chaldean astrological based taxonomy view and are now redundant.
Susan Blackmore in 'The Meme Machine' © 1999 Oxford University Press says
that the whole "...question of language origins has been so contentious,
that as long ago as 1866 the Societe de Linguistique de Paris banned any
more speculation about the issue."
This model also maintains a consistency with the vMeme work of Chris Cowan
co-author with Psychiatrist Don Beck of "Spiral Dynamics -- Mastering
values, leadership and change" contained on the Spiral Dynamics WWW-page:
"Those who have not recently visited Dolf's work will find much new at
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos. Given the situation in
Israel/Palestine and all of the religious undercurrents in today's world,
Dolf's perspective offers yet another way to view the forces influencing
human nature." [Ref: http://www.spiraldynamics.com/news.htm ]
It is perhaps that such considerations are beyond the intellectual and
spiritual conceptions of most Australians, that you have made your
ill-formed comments above.
As a former member of the Victoria Police who experienced the epi-centre of
the Russell Street, Melbourne Police Centre Bombing of 1986, my public
conduct on the Internet has been to respond, negate, tanquilize and if
necessary vapourise issues of religious fundamentalism and extremism which
give rise to acts of terrorism such as New York September 11, 2001 and Bali
of October 12, 2002.
I often wonder whether the narrow world views and lack of responsible public
action conveyed by "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@no-spam>, has contributed to the
loss of life in Bali and New York.
- Qolon
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:02 AM
the World!}
Qolon <telos@no-spam> wrote in message
news:F6JNa.50$pg6.4228@no-spam
> By the way, there is nothing restraining
> you from proffering a public apology
Corse there is, I dont feel like doing that, fruit loop.
> --I'm expecting one!
You can expect santa to deliver you another
blow up doll if you like. About as likely.
<reams of completely superfluous proof that its
completely out of its tree flushed where it belongs>
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS DIALOG
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 8:17 AM
the World!}
Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f073348$1@no-spam
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> Hunter1 <hunter1@no-spam> wrote
>>> The problem being that Dolf forwards complaints to
>>> the ISP of every person who doesn't agree with him.
>> Lie.
> Oh really???
Yes, really.
> Just for example he's done the same
> with this very post I'm replying to,
Says sweet fuck all about whether he does that with
EVERY PERSON WHO DOESNT AGREE WITH HIM, stupid.
> and every other post not agreeing with him in this thread.
Says sweet fuck all about whether he does that with
EVERY PERSON WHO DOESNT AGREE WITH HIM, stupid.
> Seems you didn't have a good look
> before you leaped on that one.
Or I have managed grasp the difference between just one thread
and every single response disagreeing with a post of his, fool.
And I dont 'leap'
>>> So as far as I'm concerned anyone else
>>> has the right to do exactly the same to him.
>> Pity about what the federal crimes act has to say about that.
> Uhuh.
>>> And he IS spamming,
>> Nope.
> Yep,
Nope.
> he is spitting his religious garbage out to as many
> newsgroups (most of which his posts are not
> applicable to) as he can remember how to spell,
Doesnt qualify as SPAM, fool.
The worst it can be claimed to be is inappropriate
crossposting. Different matter entirely.
> so at the very least he is trolling,
Perfectly legal, fool. And if he believes that drivel he spews,
it aint even trolling, its just the mindless spew of an individual
with a VERY tenuous grip on its sanity. Just like with most
of the worst of the rabid religious fanatics.
> but considering he is pretty much marketing his own
> self-tailored religious-views I'm happy to call it spamming,
More fool you. Thats not what that word means.
> but either way both are a pain in the arse
> regardless of which you define his posts as.
No one is holding a gun to your head and forcing
you to read what you dont choose to read, fool.
>>> which is against his ISP's AUP,
>> Lie.
> Yawn... Try reading Telstra Bigpond's AUP
You lied about what it says, fool.
> before you yet again leap before thinking.
Even you should be able to bullshit your way out of
your predicament better than that pathetic effort, fool.
>>> and he IS initiating crossposted threads to
>>> non-related newsgroups in a very big way,
>> Doesnt happen to be illegal.
> Who said it was illegal??? It breaches his AUP however.
No AUP gets any say what so ever on what isnt illegal.
>>> which is also against his ISP's AUP,
>> Lie.
> Yawn. See above.
Completely useless, as always with your drivel.
>>> and he HAS continuously made slanderous
>>> comments about other parties
>> Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinions,
>> terminally stupid tho they may well be.
> Actually that's a shadowy area,
Wrong. As always.
> the courts are still finding their way when it comes
> to the internet and many interesting things have
> happened and will continue to happen in this area.
Mindless waffle. Everyone is entitled to their opinion on that stuff.
> But legalities aside it breaches his AUP.
Lie.
> He is making multiple vexacious complaints against other users,
So are you.
> turn-about is fair play,
Wrong, legally.
> and when it comes to complaining about
> Dolf the complaints aren't even vexacious,
Another lie.
> they're perfectly legitimate.
Another lie. You get no say what so ever on
what is allegedly a breach of his ISP's AUP.
And you flout the federal crimes act when you
do precisely what you whine about him doing.
>>> (not the least of which was accusing AXA Australia of perjury)
>> Perfectly legal. Thats just his opinion,
>> terminally stupid tho it may well be.
> As most of his posts are.
Its perfectly legal to be terminally stupid. In spades with those who
have a VERY tenuous grip on their sanity due to their medical condition.
>>> which is also against his ISP's AUP.
>> Soorree, our constitution guarantees free speach.
>> You get to like that or lump that.
> It doesn't seem to work so well then.
Wrong. As always.
> Anti-racial vilification laws,
Which wouldnt survive a constitutional challenge.
> arrest for disorderly conduct due to swearing,
> court suppression of people speaking about
> things, libel/slander litigation on a daily basis.
You clearly aint gotta clue about what free speech is about.
> It appears that guarantee that you speak of is very flimsy at best.
You clearly aint gotta clue about what free speech is about.
>>> He's happy enough to complain about others, he's happy
>>> enough to pollute these newsgroups, so I'm happy enough
>>> to give him and Telstra a dose of his own medicine.
>> Your ISP may well have a problem with your federal crimes.
> Uhuh.
And your encitement of others to flout the federal crimes act too.
>>> I say good on Tess for making a complaint, the loser
>>> shouldn't think he's the only one with the ability to do so,
>>> and she wont be the only one complaining about him.
>> Her ISP may well have a problem with her federal crimes.
> Uhuh.
>>> I say heaps to many people, and cop heaps from many people,
>>> but that's the nature of usenet and should be left as such,
>>> but Dolf is a different kettle of fish, he is a litigation fan
>> Litigation terminal fruit loop, actually.
> Agreed.
Not that uncommon with those with a VERY tenuous grip on their sanity.
>>> (and seems to have failed on every turn of the wheel) and
>>> also likes to make vexacious complaints against other people
>>> to their ISP's, it's about time his ISP heard all about him.
>> Pity thats a federal crime which your ISP may well have a problem with.
> Uhuh. They just set up those abuse accounts for fun huh?
Nope, for the reporting of illegal activity, stupid.
>>> Perhaps when his own tactics are used
>>> against him he might think twice next time.
>> In your pathetic little drug crazed dreams.
> Well yes I do like my beer, not to mention
> coffee, but I don't think they craze my dreams.
They obviously do.
> Why, do they tend to make you something something do they?
I wasnt the one proclaiming on that stupid line about 'think twice' fool.
If you havent even noticed that its got a VERY tenuous
grip on its sanity, and that that sort of attack is MUCH
more likely to just produce more of the same in response...
The only thing that will stop it is a padded cell with no
net access, or one of those funky canvas jackets with
extremely long sleeves and the fools in charge of those
hardly ever bother to use them anymore.
So you get to like it or lump it when terminal fruit
loops like that one post stuff you dont approve of.
>>> But then again, maybe not.
>> Corse it wont. Even you must have noticed that he's
>> completely out of his fucking tree, and absolutely
>> classic example of AIDS induced insanity.
> I'm not relying on his coherence at all (because
> there is no coherence there), I was hoping Telstra
> would just get sick of hearing about him. But then
> they don't seem to give a shit what he does.
They are well aware of what they can do, legally.
And the TIO will rub their noses in that if they arent.
Just like your nose will inevitably be rubbed in your
criminal activitys under the federal crimes act too.
>>> Telstra (which is strange for the company running
>>> the telecommunication infrastructure of this country)
>>> don't seem to care about breaches of their AUP
>> They do understand the law on that stuff.
>> They know that that stuff in their AUP is pure
>> bluff that only works with the legally pig ignorant.
>> If they took any action they would be getting involved
>> in a federal crime. Even Telstra aint THAT stupid.
> Ok, I'll bite. "And what crime would that be?"
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca191482/s85ze.html
>>> and ignore all complaints as far as I've seen.
>> Yep, as they should.
>>> My ISP actually bothered to chase up Dolf's complaints
>> Obviously legally pig ignorant...
>>> but dropped them after I explained the nature
>>> of Dolf, obviously they actually back their AUP
>> One of these days they're gunna try it with someone
>> who does understand the law and they're gunna end
>> up with their arse in a sling, very spectacularly indeed.
> Funny, Telstra have done it in the
> past, at least to two people I know of.
And they got their nose rubbed in the law, by the TIO.
> They just don't seem too interested these days.
Because even Telstra does eventually manage
to get the basics right on whats legal eventually.
>>> (and 10 points for that, if all ISP's did this we wouldn't
>>> have losers like Dolf and Strider wrecking our newsgroups),
>> You're always welcome to use a killfile so
>> you never see what you dont care to read.
> Agreed, but that's far too technological
> for dolf's limited understanding.
You're the one that uses it fool.
> I'd be happy to just ignore the loser, but since
> he feels the need to continuously launch complaints
> and legal proceedings against people I reckon
> throwing the same shit back at him is fair play.
Pity the law doesnt.
And he can always get off by reason of his florid insanity.
You dont have that excuse available.
>>> Telstra don't seem to.
>> Because they understand the legal basics, even if your ISP doesnt.
>> There's a reason Telstra has entire floors stuffed with legals.
> Must not have stopped them with those they have taken action against.
Sure did. Thats why they aint stupid enough to try it anymore, stupid.
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 08:51:32 +0800
Qolon wrote:
> <snipped diatribe which being made some 7 days after the initial comments,
> giving rise to the view we are responding to an individual with a
> psychiatric disorder>
a> It's not "your" thread you bloody egotistical fool, it's
a public thread in a public newsgroup.
b> You're complaining to my ISP about a message that you've
snipped??? Well I know this might be a bit complicated for
you to grasp, but they may find it difficult to work out
what you object to if you snip the message. Like I said,
your grasp on reality is slipping.
c> I'll respond whenever I bloody well like, the only person
here who seems to have a psychiatric disorder is yourself,
which makes it all the funnier when you accuse everyone you
complain about of having such a disorder.
d> I think you can find a shrink through the public health
system. Why don't you do so? No-one here's interested in
your crap.
e> All of the above.
This is a complaint of Misuse, Slanderous Characterisations and Continued
Public Harasmment by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam>. It is made in
addition to previous complaints lodged today to which Ticket ID of
[arach.net.au #69805 and #69806] apply and the content of which had not been
forwarded to the newsgroup.
As a result of continuing and over the past 7 years being subject to
Internet based religious liabel and slander which can stay around for many
years, I have on 27 June, 2003 received a new birth certificate as change of
name from Dolf Boek.
I have made every effort to disassociate myself from the unrelenting and
vicious characterizations made upon the Internet, not the least of which has
been promulgated by "Hunter1" <hunter1@no-spam> as a miscreate--There
is no evidence by their Internet contributions that they are committed to
making the world a better and kinder place.
As an added incentive to dissuade him from making further unwanted
contributions to my discussion threads, I have copied this response to his
respective Internet Service Provider: abuse@no-spam
Given these past experiences of individual & institutional religious-values
based slander (much of it public) has in the instance of a diseased state,
resulted in loss of autonomy, famility bonds, long term relationships,
employment opportunities and societal excoriation, I begin to wonder why I
have to put up with it day after day--I have every intention of seeking to
make retrospective legal claims against the individuals such "Hunter1"
<hunter1@no-spam> for the public acts of vilification perpetuated and
which have the potential for a long life on the Internet.
Accordingly the Header of the offending post is as follows:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4)
Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:
aus.religion,aus.religion.christian,aus.politics,soc.culture.australian,aus.
legal,aus.general
from
his arse?
References: <pVPKa.332$eR2.4185@no-spam>
<3EFCAC98.1080207@no-spam>
<CR2La.26$l83.599@no-spam>
<3efd5991$0$30819$afc38c87@no-spam>
<eedLa.946$l83.9084@no-spam>
<3efe5752$0$31278$afc38c87@no-spam>
<bdlopd$u8nie$1@no-spam> <3EFEB01A.5080006@no-spam>
<WDyLa.580$mq3.8192@no-spam>
<3EFED58A.2020700@no-spam>
<3RALa.730$mq3.10412@no-spam>
<3f072f45@no-spam>
<b4INa.20$pg6.3385@no-spam>
In-Reply-To: <b4INa.20$pg6.3385@no-spam>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.33.247.8
Message-ID: <3f077295$1@no-spam>
X-Trace: funnel.arach.net.au 1057452693 203.33.247.8 (6 Jul 2003 08:51:33
+0800)
Lines: 30
Path:
news-server.bigpond.net.au!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!ken-transit.news.tel
stra.net!news.telstra.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.xtra.co.nz!ne
ws1.optus.net.au!optus!news.uwa.edu.au!nntp.waia.asn.au!203.30.44.11.MISMATC
H!funnel.arach.net.au!not-for-mail
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au aus.religion:23354
aus.religion.christian:89731 aus.politics:554643
soc.culture.australian:144225 aus.legal:58355 aus.general:97337
To begin this process and establish the basis for costs, I have also th