This is my point.....most do relate to the topic but they lose all meaning
and impact if you don't know what the topic is...
~Seb
"pix" <pix@no-spam> wrote in
news:mZsJa.7559$eE.70145@no-spam
> I reckon its fine as it is - tis the picture that counts, not the
> words underneath it... As for the subject matter, "ruins" leaves a
> whole raft subject matter from which to choose. As one commented (I
> think it was actually his/her partner) that they could have used their
> face just out of bed in the mornings. (But don't quote me on that!) So
> it is up to you as the photographer to do an interpretation that will
> fit the them, and up to the judges as to whether it does fit.
>
> Just have fun with it - I do!
>
> cheers
> pix
>
> "VH-MR2" <sickoyouNOTREQUIRED@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3ef5a708@no-spam
>>
>> "Carole Bradford" <carolebradford@no-spam> wrote in message
>> news:sEgJa.1921$r64.46171@no-spam
>> >
>> >
>> > Also - It might be helpful if the photos were titled/captioned!
>> > Hard to determine what we are looking at!
>> > Regards
>> > Carole Bradford
>>
>> Hi Carole,
>>
>> I didn't put anything like that up to assist in not identifying the
>> owner
> of
>> the images, I can put then in if people like .. (next comp though)
>>
>>
>>
>> B.
>>
>>
>
>
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:26:19 +1000, "Thomas Houseman"
<thomashouseman@no-spam> wrote:
>What's with the car crash one leading??!!
There are really only 4 shots in the running it seems.
>Dodgy voting?
I think you missed reading this bit ...
>be growing pains with this code and right now it does allow multiple votes
>on the same IP address, however only the first vote will be counted.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:20:45 +1000, Mr Biggus, wrote:
>
>>What's with the car crash one leading??!!
>>Dodgy voting?
> Im lost as to what a pair of shoes has to do with Ruins.....
Well they weren't in what one could call pristine condition - different
people, different interpretations.
d
Now that's a bummer :-( i'll let you enter 3 next time, how about that?
:-)
"Dunco" <wwwg@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3EFAC3DA.9000100@no-spam
No problem...just curious.
BTW...it was a winner :)