AUS POLITICS 39 RE WELL DONE DOLF
From: "Rowland Croucher" (rcroucher@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Well done Dolf
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:21:38 +1000


Problem is, veritas, Bill et al if you respond to Dolf it encourages more of the same :-(

--
Shalom!

Rowland Croucher
http://www.pastornet.net.au/jmm/index.htm (Now 10,100 + articles!)

"veritas" <nospam@no-spam> wrote in message news:3EF670C4.9070202@no-spam > You have just published a post that expressed your opinion that was no-nonsense and > straight to the point.
>
> Well done dolf! The new style, if continued, will be very much appreciated.
>
> veritas >
> Dolf Boek wrote:
> > Honorable Mr. John Howard > > Prime Minister,
> >
> > Monday 23 June, 2003
> >
> > Dear Prime Minister,
> >
> > I for one think you have made an excellent choice, in recommending the > > appointment of Major-General Michael Jeffery as our new Governor General.
> >
> > He appears to have a good mix of Institutional experience, a dignified > > autonomous disposition and possessive of a reasoned and capable of mind > > which is willing to be outspoken and progressive on the issues that we as a > > unique nation face as our contribution to the world and peace.
> >
> > Well done!
> >
> > - dolf > > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html > >
> >
>


From: "Dolf Boek" (dolf_boek@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Well done Dolf
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:31:15 GMT

"Rowland Croucher" <rcroucher@no-spam> wrote in message news:3ef7fc02$0$30821$afc38c87@no-spam Problem is, veritas, Bill et al if you respond to Dolf it encourages more of the same :-(

DOLF NOTE:
Without acknowledging their dependency on Judaism as Christianity, Sunday sacred Christianity has with the reprise of Y2K, no basis in truth. And as hymeneal occultism is simply: marriage and given in marriage {ie. Mary worship} which is expressly condemned within Scripture as a violation of the Everlasting Covenant God made with Israel--The Egyptian basis to much of what today passes itself off as Christianity, is by contrast a deification of death! Then He said to the disciples, "The days will come when you will desire to see one of the days of the Son of Man, and you will not see it.
And they will say to you, 'Look here!' or 'Look there!' Do not go after them or follow them. For as the lightning that flashes out of one part under heaven shines to the other part under heaven, so also the Son of Man will be in His day. But first He must suffer many things and be rejected by this generation. And as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be also in the days of the Son of Man: They ate, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. Likewise as it was also in the days of Lot:
They ate, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they built; but on the day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. Even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed." [Luke 17:22-30]

For in the resurrection of the dead ie. the return to the Everlasting Covenant, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are as Angels--Jesus said so--why should these self professed princes of darkness such as "Rowland Croucher" <rcroucher@no-spam> go against the words of Jesus?

Jesus answered and said to them, "You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven. But concerning the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken to you by God, saying, 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living." [Matthew 22:29-32]

Jesus answered and said to them, "Are you not therefore mistaken, because you do not know the Scriptures nor the power of God? For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. But concerning the dead, that they rise, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the burning bush passage, how God spoke to him, saying, 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'? He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living. You are therefore greatly mistaken." [Mark 12:24-27]

Jesus answered and said to them, "The sons of this age marry and are given in marriage. But those who are counted worthy to attain that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage; nor can they die anymore, for they are equal to the angels and are sons of God,
being sons of the resurrection. But even Moses showed in the burning bush passage that the dead are raised, when he called the Lord 'the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.' For He is not the God of the dead but of the living, for all live to Him." [Luke 20:34 -38]

- dolf http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/


From: veritas (nospam@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Well done Dolf----- ERR! - I TAKE IT ALL BACK
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:43:59 GMT

Oh shit - he's off again!!!!

veritas
Dolf Boek wrote:
> Rabbi Nachman..................


From: veritas (nospam@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Well done Dolf
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:45:28 GMT

Seems so.

Cheers - veritas
Rowland Croucher wrote:
> Problem is, veritas, Bill et al if you respond to Dolf it encourages more of > the same :-(
>

From: "Dolf Boek" (dolf_boek@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Well done Dolf----- ERR! - I TAKE IT ALL BACK
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:51:21 GMT

I believe that "veritas" <nospam@no-spam> is showing his true colors--he is anti-semitic and cannot even make a claim to Christianity.

If your sentences were a little longer, perhaps we could analyse whether your ideology is fascist as well--or are you just a superficial and soulless big brother viewer/participant. If such is the case--do you enjoy Humphrey B Bear as well?

Might I suggest you go play on a newsgroup such as aus.test rather than disrupting dialog with others.

- dolf http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html
"veritas" <nospam@no-spam> wrote in message news:3EF81D61.1090108@no-spam Oh shit - he's off again!!!!

veritas

From: Barry OGrady (god_fre_jones@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Well done Dolf----- ERR! - I TAKE IT ALL BACK
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:40:39 +1000

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:51:21 GMT, "Dolf Boek" <dolf_boek@no-spam> wrote:

>I believe that "veritas" <nospam@no-spam> is showing his true colors--he >is anti-semitic and cannot even make a claim to Christianity.

Dolf, when you move into a new country, you are expected to learn the language.
If you plan to stay in Australia, learn the language!

>If your sentences were a little longer, perhaps we could analyse whether >your ideology is fascist as well--or are you just a superficial and soulless >big brother viewer/participant. If such is the case--do you enjoy Humphrey >B Bear as well?
>
>Might I suggest you go play on a newsgroup such as aus.test rather than >disrupting dialog with others.
>
>- dolf >http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html >
>"veritas" <nospam@no-spam> wrote in message >news:3EF81D61.1090108@no-spam >Oh shit - he's off again!!!!
>
>veritas >
>

-Barry ========
Web page: http://members.optusnet.com.au/~barry.og Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
Voicemail/fax number +14136227640


From: Stan Flatto (compaid@no-spam)
Subject: Re: - Dear Prime Minister
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:16:35 GMT

Dolf Boek wrote:
> Honorable Mr. John Howard > Prime Minister,

Are you referring to THE mouthpiece of Australian Inteligence (a contradiction in terms) who supplied us with "children overboard" and Iraqi weapons of mass destruction info?

Be serious.

Shmuel ben Yehuda.


From: Barry OGrady (god_freee_jones@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Well done Dolf
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:38:03 +1000

On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 03:15:15 GMT, veritas <nospam@no-spam> wrote:

>You have just published a post that expressed your opinion that was no-nonsense and
> straight to the point.
>
>Well done dolf! The new style, if continued, will be very much appreciated.

He misspelled honourable, and it's off topic and of interest to no one, which is the style
of Dolf.

>veritas >
>Dolf Boek wrote:
>> Honorable Mr. John Howard >> Prime Minister,
>> >> Monday 23 June, 2003
>> >> Dear Prime Minister,
>> >> I for one think you have made an excellent choice, in recommending the >> appointment of Major-General Michael Jeffery as our new Governor General.
>> >> He appears to have a good mix of Institutional experience, a dignified >> autonomous disposition and possessive of a reasoned and capable of mind >> which is willing to be outspoken and progressive on the issues that we as a >> unique nation face as our contribution to the world and peace.
>> >> Well done!
>> >> - dolf >> http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html >> >>
-Barry ========
Web page: http://members.optusnet.com.au/~barry.og Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
Voicemail/fax number +14136227640


From: "Qolon" (telos@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Well done Dolf----- ERR! - I TAKE IT ALL BACK
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 05:20:21 GMT

"Barry OGrady" <god_freee_jones@no-spam> wrote in message news:ruk0kvglir2rvjt3g06tln9rd1tp28mka5@no-spam On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:51:21 GMT, "Dolf Boek" <dolf_boek@no-spam> wrote:

>I believe that "veritas" <nospam@no-spam> is showing his true colors--he >is anti-semitic and cannot even make a claim to Christianity.

Dolf <idiot@no-spam> is showing that he has never left his native America.

Go back there scumbag.

QOLON NOTE:

#54
Angel/Daemon of Ieiaiel /Teiaiel [106°-110° /Jul 7-11 /Cancer /Water /10, 10, 10 = 30 (#2)
Isopsephy: Deka - Ten Yy
SHIN (#300/ #700)
{Autonomous NATURE}
Latin: Deus Alt: Yabmyah {Wedded to God}] {
1. FORETELLS FUTURE, PROTECTS AGAINST STORMS AND SHIPWRECKS 2. FORTUNE IN BUSINESS 3. BUSINESS TRIPS 4. Syth / Theliel - in occultic lore, the angelic prince of love, invoked in ceremonial magic to procure the woman desired}

[#28, #23, #55, #54 - Culturing Perspectives/ The Cultivation of Intuition]
"And yet you are not ignorant of the importance of a proper application of names. For before this time, as you proceed in your history, you show this,
when speaking in reference to he same person you say, 'And Adam {earthy;
red} knew Eve {living; enlivening} his wife, and she conceived and brought forth a son, and she called his name Seth. {put; who puts; fixed}' [Genesis 4:25] Therefore it was much more necessary in the case of the first-born,
who was the beginning of the generation of men from one another, to display the nature of him who was thus conceived and born, in the first place showing that he was a male child, and secondly mentioning his peculiar name,
Cain {possession, or possessed}."

At this URL <http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/meta/cherubim.html> is the completed #1 to #130 Angel & Number Daemons concerning a Theological discourse on the "Taxonomical {ie. Hebrew, Greek & English} Quadruple {1+2+3+4=10} Form {isonomic/isopsephic} of the 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 Matrix "
{ie.

The Metaphysical or Esoteric Theology of the Hebrews as the Regulative Philosophic principles which underpin the Letters Patent to Australia's Constitution of 1901CE
<http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4>

} in what Philo Judaeus of Alexandria (20BCE - 50CE) himself describes as delight "...in the lofty philosophy which investigates the events which take place in the air, and the sublime nature of the beings which exist in heaven {ie. [#72, #63, #75, #4 - Using Guidance/ Sourceless]}, which mathematical science claims for itself as the most excellent part of natural philosophy..."

Do be cautious in reading it though, as composition will undermine your present and any existing religious belief.

- Qolon <http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/meta/cherubim.html>

"Barry OGrady" <god_freee_jones@no-spam> wrote in message news:8rk0kvkq2nno115eislscgrklesjhd3au3@no-spam On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 03:15:15 GMT, veritas <nospam@no-spam> wrote:

>You have just published a post that expressed your opinion that was no-nonsense and > straight to the point.
>
>Well done dolf! The new style, if continued, will be very much appreciated.

He misspelled honourable, and it's off topic and of interest to no one,
which is the style of Dolf.

QOLON NOTE:
After last night responding to further miscreants who engage in gratuitous vilification on religious discussion newsgroups--I was joyed to receive advice from Microsoft Hotmail.com that at least they had been capable in removing the offending account.

However, I would really like to know, why it is that Australian Internet Service Providers can do so little about such Internet based vilification,
made for no other purpose than the enjoyment of causing others psychological trauma--to which I have been subject for the past 7 years.

It doen't make me proud of being Australian, when you people sit and watch!

-----------------------------------

Dear Readers,

I don't have any further time for "veritas" nospam@no-spam delusions, so I'm actually elated that they won't be responding further.

Veritas' theological statements as a Godless individual (ie atheist),
concerning the work of Dr Thiering Ph.D. (Theology): "I never at any time said that I believed anything I quoted only that I relied on certain publications to support my argument. I am an atheist!"

Seems at odds with their previous comment of reliance on such works:

"However I do appreciate the work of Dr Thiering Ph.D. (Theology). Her CV credits her with teaching at the University of Sydney, lecturing in "Old Testament" and "Hebrew". I rely upon Dr Thiering's more recent day interpretation of the Dead Sea Scrolls. I am therefore more likely to rely upon Dr Thiering's work than to blindly accept older religious interpretations of the "facts"." ["veritas" <nospam@no-spam>]

Also Veritas' statement: 'I was particularly amused with you slanderous remark about Dr Thiering when you published: "She was clearly deranged" is incorrect.

It was the example of the woman who was placing 'glue-ups' over signage of 'Arianne wearing lingerie' outside my apartment whom I addressed as 'clearly deranged'. I did say of your comments that they exhibited a lack of substance as theological cohesion and given Dr Thiering's work I had formed a conclusion as to what sort of person I was addressing. You have simply confirmed it by now indicating your were making religious statements as a Godless person. That same lack of theological cohesion is exhibited amongst Muslims and Catholics and is consistent with my view that, despite all attempts to circumvent it as Jubilee2000 and rising acts of violence,
that the Millenium has brought a failure of many Institutional forms of religious belief systems--They are superstitious!

As I said previously the Scriptures however give a definitative timeline--indeed they name the day! When considering I'm primarily interested in talking to my readers and mapping this narrative to the space/time continuum for my own studies. My readers may desire to note the following:

1) The vMemes in the newsgroup post made at Sunday, 6 July 2003 7:20 PM referencing Jewish exile (galus) and this process concluding in 6,000 years as Telos apogee, co-incided with SBS TV's program on King David's Dynasty at 7:30PM http://www.sbs.com.au/whatson/index.php3?progdate=6:07:2003

2) The vMemes in the newsgroup post made at Monday, 7 July 2003 3:05 PM referencing Scripture texts [Acts 24:17-23 and Isaiah 40:12-17] co-incided with The Age Newspaper's Article titled 'Judge cautions Samudra as anti-West hatred flares'
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/07/07/1057430137376.html
3) The vMemes conveyed by the newsgroup post made at Monday, July 07, 2003
10:00 PM referencing the Fire alarm evacuation and the 'arianne lingerie'
glue-ups co-incided with The Age Newspaper's Article titled 'Speaking out -
female firefighters want parity'
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/07/07/1057430137415.html
} Consider too that according to the Angel names of God as the Divine Name in extension as a metaschema obtained anagrammatically from [Exodus 14:19-21] [cf: Luke 12:8-12 cf: Kaplan 1979:184], that the metaphysical influence for this time.