AUS SPORT AUSSIE-RULES 13 RE SO MUCH FOR THE LOCK OF THE ROUND
From: -mike- (clawson@no-spam)
Subject: Re: So Much For The Lock Of The Round
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 22:54:17 -0700


Goes to show how much I know. Hint: Tippers should watch for my picks and go opposite.

-m-






















From: "Sanctify" (sancters@no-spam)
Subject: So Much For The Lock Of The Round
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 08:03:47 +0930

Like I said - no game is safe....and I got my Freo over Brissie..

I expect questions will now be asked - Primus out of the side and Port win,
Primus in and they lose. Perhaps it's time that Port look to removing Primus from the side completely.....


From: "Sanctify" (sancters@no-spam)
Subject: Re: So Much For The Lock Of The Round
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 08:35:31 +0930

"Plugger" <therealplugger@no-spam> wrote in message news:3f08a74c$0$59958$c30e37c6@no-spam > "Sanctify" <sancters@no-spam> wrote in message > news:1057530652.640502@no-spam > > Like I said - no game is safe....and I got my Freo over Brissie..
> >
> > I expect questions will now be asked - Primus out of the side and Port > win,
> > Primus in and they lose. Perhaps it's time that Port look to removing > > Primus from the side completely.....
>
> Maybe Primus in the side means that other players don't expect to have to do > as much. I've been wondering if that mentality might affect the Crows as the > talk has constantly been along the lines of: "wait until we get our injured > players back". There would always be the danger that other players might > drop off the intensity whey they actually do get back in.

Difference being that we tend to win once we get key players back into the side. For the best part of this season we've had our forward line out -
only now are we getting them back - Welsh, Stevens (should be this week if Perrie gets rubbed out), Burns, Carey, Burton have all been out for extended periods this year, meaning that the team has had to make do with ad-hoc forwards. Once they're back in we're kicking goals - Carey isn't getting a bag full but he's doing more than enough by setting up play - his game against Carlton last week was an example of this, and his last quarter on Saturday showed why the Crows were keen to sign him, along with at least 10
other clubs.

There's a lot made of how vital to Port Primus is, how he's one of the best players in the side, but they appear to do better without him than they do with him. While he's been gone Lade and especially Brogan have come along gangbusters, Lade is going to be very hard done by for the rest of the season and should be traded away at the end of the season to a side that'll give him a decent shot. However if Primus isn't there then Lade can prove his worth to the club - very odd indeed.
>
> Anyway, as no doubt the Port Spinners will be preaching, this will be a wake > up call for the Puffs and a bit of a reality check from which they might > possibly benefit.

If they take it the right way they will. However it'll be interesting to see how many games they win from now on with Primus back in. Port people made much of the fact that they win without Primus in the side (hence the lack of a one man team), but how many do they win with him there?


From: Biggus The Greatest (nojunkmailplease-fu_kew@no-spam)
Subject: Re: So Much For The Lock Of The Round
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 12:12:45 +1000

>Maybe Primus in the side means that other players don't expect to have to do as much. I've been wondering if that mentality might affect the Crows as the talk has constantly been along the lines of: "wait until we get our injured
>players back". There would always be the danger that other players might drop off the intensity whey they actually do get back in.


I agree, I think that happens in LOTS of teams, they rely on ONE star player, and when that bloke aint there, they crumble.

Each team seems to have a 'commentators' favorite player which is the hero...


From: "Matthew McCarthy" (matmac@no-spam)
Subject: Re: So Much For The Lock Of The Round
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 12:31:49 +1000

Biggus The Greatest <nojunkmailplease-fu_kew@no-spam> wrote in message news:0nlhgvkj4a4gk73stha4ro4jusuv7583cm@no-spam > >Maybe Primus in the side means that other players don't expect to have to do as much. I've been wondering if that mentality might affect the Crows as the talk has constantly been along the lines of: "wait until we get our injured > >players back". There would always be the danger that other players might drop off the intensity whey they actually do get back in.
>
> I agree, I think that happens in LOTS of teams, they rely on ONE star > player, and when that bloke aint there, they crumble.
>
> Each team seems to have a 'commentators' favorite player which is the > hero...

Hey if Port think Primus makes them lose games, send him over here now and quickly to Napier Street, Essendon.


From: "ho'JU" (jaspar@no-spam)
Subject: Re: So Much For The Lock Of The Round
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 18:01:58 +1000

"Sanctify" <sancters@no-spam> wrote in message news:1057530652.640502@no-spam > Like I said - no game is safe....and I got my Freo over Brissie..
>
> I expect questions will now be asked - Primus out of the side and Port win,
> Primus in and they lose. Perhaps it's time that Port look to removing > Primus from the side completely.....

In my work tipping comp every single person tipped Adelaide to win. I also said it was my guaranteed win.

So yes, there was a safe game.

ho'JU