"JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
news:cKwNa.460$kY2.21274@no-spam
>
> "Ådâm.©" <propmeupwithanotherpill@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f0692c9$1@no-spam
> > Have only won one from their past 4 games. looking shaky. Hawthorn next
> week
> > and so far no team has won after playing @no-spam Perth, (see how roos go
tnite).
> > Hawks form has been good. Lions looked hurt in the last 10 minutes.
Hawks
> > the safer bet next week.
>
> Sure. Hawthorn has a fantastic track record at the Gabba.
LOL.. yeah from memory the last two times they came up here they got done by
88 points and 102 points.
"JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
news:7qxNa.468$kY2.21811@no-spam
>
> "David J Richardson" <davidj@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:davidj-255646.19525105072003@no-spam
> > In article <3f0692c9$1@no-spam>,
> > "Ådâm.©" <propmeupwithanotherpill@no-spam> wrote:
> >
> > > Have only won one from their past 4 games. looking shaky. Hawthorn
> > > next week and so far no team has won after playing @no-spam Perth, (see how
> > > roos go tnite). Hawks form has been good. Lions looked hurt in the
> > > last 10 minutes. Hawks the safer bet next week.
> >
> > Here's a safer bet: Hawthorn will get smashed over the next 4 weeks.
>
> Hawks to lose the next 4 you reckon ?
Who have you got? You must have us soon? Rnd 16 I think... you'll belt it in
if we don't turn up (which is highly likely).
"Mark Shea" <zadeja@no-spam> wrote in message
news:be6lnp$1qn89$1@no-spam
>
> "David J Richardson" <davidj@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:davidj-255646.19525105072003@no-spam
>
> > Brisbane would have won if Lynch had gone over (I assume, not having
> > seen it).
>
> Probably. An extra back man would have won it for Brisbane; our forwards
> were utterly innocuous, for the second week in a row. I demand to know why
> Longmuir is so highly rated.
He kicked 6 against our Highly Rated, Fantastic, Efficient and Tall
backline... he must be good :)
"Epigram" <atg@no-spam> wrote in message
news:BB2D9C0B.286F%atg@no-spam
> On 5/7/03 9:52 AM, David J Richardson bleated:
>
> > In article <3f0692c9$1@no-spam>,
> > "ÁdÉm.©" <propmeupwithanotherpill@no-spam> wrote:
> >
> >> Have only won one from their past 4 games. looking shaky. Hawthorn
> >> next week and so far no team has won after playing @no-spam Perth, (see how
> >> roos go tnite). Hawks form has been good. Lions looked hurt in the
> >> last 10 minutes. Hawks the safer bet next week.
> >
> > Here's a safer bet: Hawthorn will get smashed over the next 4 weeks.
>
> Looks likely. Brisbane look like they can be the only team that can win
> after a trip to Subi (the Wiggles don't count after winning against Freo
in
> the Derby- Subi is their home ground too).
>
> > Remember when Richmond were world-beaters at the start of the year?
> > Then they had to play some decent teams...
> >
> > Brisbane would have won if Lynch had gone over (I assume, not having
> > seen it). Yes, they're looking a bit sick a la Essendon 2001, but we're
> > a long way out yet.
>
> I disagree. Lynch really had a bad time of it by suffering from CFS (and
> from the people I know with CFS, they *suffer*). It wasn't a day for a
> forward like him, plus the trip over would have impacted badly on his
form,
> not just for the game, but for many games afterwards.
>
> Polak, a young, mobile, strong marking 19 yo would, IMHO, beat Lynch
easily.
> So would have Parker. They have the confidence, ability and other
> attributes to beat Lynch. Besides, given the blustery conditions, not
even
> Hart or Voss could have delivered the ball to Lynch so close to goal that
he
> could reliably score. Realiable scoring distance was about 20m.
>
He's pretty damn strong, even with CFS... if only he could hold onto easy
marks he'd win a coleman.
"Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f086dcb$1_1@no-spam
>
> "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:7qxNa.468$kY2.21811@no-spam
> >
> > "David J Richardson" <davidj@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:davidj-255646.19525105072003@no-spam
> > > In article <3f0692c9$1@no-spam>,
> > > "Ådâm.©" <propmeupwithanotherpill@no-spam> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Have only won one from their past 4 games. looking shaky. Hawthorn
> > > > next week and so far no team has won after playing @no-spam Perth, (see how
> > > > roos go tnite). Hawks form has been good. Lions looked hurt in the
> > > > last 10 minutes. Hawks the safer bet next week.
> > >
> > > Here's a safer bet: Hawthorn will get smashed over the next 4 weeks.
> >
> > Hawks to lose the next 4 you reckon ?
>
> Who have you got? You must have us soon? Rnd 16 I think... you'll belt it
in
> if we don't turn up (which is highly likely).
Tough month ahead ...
Bris in Brisbane
Melb in Melbourne
Sydney in Sydney
Port in Melbourne
"Epigram" <atg@no-spam> wrote in message
news:BB2F1ED6.2948%atg@no-spam
> On 6/7/03 11:25 AM, JohnD. bleated:
>
> >
> > "Jason Derby" <shadow007@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3f078704$0$22140@no-spam
> >> "Epigram" <atg@no-spam> wrote in message
> >> news:BB2DA280.2885%atg@no-spam
> >>> On 5/7/03 10:42 AM, Res bleated:
> >>> If you can tell me where "Rotto" is
> >>
> >> Just off the Perth coast.
> >>
> >>> what it is
> >>
> >> An Island
> >>
> >>> and what's so special about it
> >
> > It's home to the uniquely Australian "quokka soccer".
>
> I was talking to Res..,
If you want to keep the conversation private, use email.
"Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f0950b8_1@no-spam
>
> "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:mu7Oa.153$fI5.4003@no-spam
> >
> > "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3f086dcb$1_1@no-spam
> > >
> > > "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > news:7qxNa.468$kY2.21811@no-spam
> > > >
> > > > "David J Richardson" <davidj@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > > news:davidj-255646.19525105072003@no-spam
> > > > > In article <3f0692c9$1@no-spam>,
> > > > > "Ådâm.©" <propmeupwithanotherpill@no-spam> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Have only won one from their past 4 games. looking shaky.
Hawthorn
> > > > > > next week and so far no team has won after playing @no-spam Perth, (see
> how
> > > > > > roos go tnite). Hawks form has been good. Lions looked hurt in
the
> > > > > > last 10 minutes. Hawks the safer bet next week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's a safer bet: Hawthorn will get smashed over the next 4
weeks.
> > > >
> > > > Hawks to lose the next 4 you reckon ?
> > >
> > > Who have you got? You must have us soon? Rnd 16 I think... you'll belt
> it
> > in
> > > if we don't turn up (which is highly likely).
> >
> > Tough month ahead ...
> >
>
> Bris in Brisbane - You'll get a touch up.
> Melb in Melbourne - Who knows.
> Sydney in Sydney - This one I think you can win...
> Port in Melbourne - Hope you win.. hope being the operative word :)
Two out of the four would be a break-even.
"Epigram" <atg@no-spam> wrote in message
news:BB2F2833.2957%atg@no-spam
> On 7/7/03 5:24 AM, JohnD. bleated:
>
> >> I was talking to Res..,
> <...>
> > If you want to keep the conversation private, use email.
>
> You're welcome to join in anytime. I was pointing out that the original
> thrust of the message was that Res didn't have a clue about Fremantle or
> Perth, and I was challanging his knowlege. No need to keep the
> "conversation" private.
>
> Then you said some disturbing things...
Hardly.
"JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
news:vqdOa.231$fI5.9632@no-spam
>
> "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f0950b8_1@no-spam
> >
> > "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:mu7Oa.153$fI5.4003@no-spam
> > >
> > > "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > news:3f086dcb$1_1@no-spam
> > > >
> > > > "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > > news:7qxNa.468$kY2.21811@no-spam
> > > > >
> > > > > "David J Richardson" <davidj@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > > > news:davidj-255646.19525105072003@no-spam
> > > > > > In article <3f0692c9$1@no-spam>,
> > > > > > "Ådâm.©" <propmeupwithanotherpill@no-spam> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Have only won one from their past 4 games. looking shaky.
> Hawthorn
> > > > > > > next week and so far no team has won after playing @no-spam Perth,
(see
> > how
> > > > > > > roos go tnite). Hawks form has been good. Lions looked hurt in
> the
> > > > > > > last 10 minutes. Hawks the safer bet next week.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's a safer bet: Hawthorn will get smashed over the next 4
> weeks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hawks to lose the next 4 you reckon ?
> > > >
> > > > Who have you got? You must have us soon? Rnd 16 I think... you'll
belt
> > it
> > > in
> > > > if we don't turn up (which is highly likely).
> > >
> > > Tough month ahead ...
> > >
> >
> > Bris in Brisbane - You'll get a touch up.
> > Melb in Melbourne - Who knows.
> > Sydney in Sydney - This one I think you can win...
> > Port in Melbourne - Hope you win.. hope being the operative word :)
>
> Two out of the four would be a break-even.
you are 60/40 against us..
45/55 in syd.
55/45 against port.
5/95 against bris :)
"JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
news:yM1Pa.13$fe1.1133@no-spam
>
> "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f0ba8de$1_1@no-spam
> >
> > "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:vqdOa.231$fI5.9632@no-spam
> > >
> > > "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > news:3f0950b8_1@no-spam
> > > >
> > > > "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > > news:mu7Oa.153$fI5.4003@no-spam
> > > > >
> > > > > "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > > > news:3f086dcb$1_1@no-spam
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:7qxNa.468$kY2.21811@no-spam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "David J Richardson" <davidj@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:davidj-255646.19525105072003@no-spam
> > > > > > > > In article <3f0692c9$1@no-spam>,
> > > > > > > > "Ådâm.©" <propmeupwithanotherpill@no-spam> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Have only won one from their past 4 games. looking shaky.
> > > Hawthorn
> > > > > > > > > next week and so far no team has won after playing @no-spam
Perth,
> > (see
> > > > how
> > > > > > > > > roos go tnite). Hawks form has been good. Lions looked
hurt
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > last 10 minutes. Hawks the safer bet next week.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here's a safer bet: Hawthorn will get smashed over the next
4
> > > weeks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hawks to lose the next 4 you reckon ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who have you got? You must have us soon? Rnd 16 I think...
you'll
> > belt
> > > > it
> > > > > in
> > > > > > if we don't turn up (which is highly likely).
> > > > >
> > > > > Tough month ahead ...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bris in Brisbane - You'll get a touch up.
> > > > Melb in Melbourne - Who knows.
> > > > Sydney in Sydney - This one I think you can win...
> > > > Port in Melbourne - Hope you win.. hope being the operative word :)
> > >
> > > Two out of the four would be a break-even.
> >
> > you are 60/40 against us..
> > 45/55 in syd.
> > 55/45 against port.
> >
> > 5/95 against bris :)
>
> How about this assessment:
>
> In Bris - no chance.
SOME chance.. a good start always has brisbane players worrying.
>
> Against Dees - depends on which Demons side turns up. The evil side from
the
> parallel universe is capable of knocking off most sides on their day.
50/50
THAT side hasn't been around all year... so my money would be on you.
>
> In Sydney - This is one the Hawks will need to win. Will match-up well
> against them. 50/50
Small ground will suit your style of play... i agree.
>
> Against Port - This will be a tougher assignment than against the Swans.
> 40/60
I think port are a touch overrated... I guess I only say that because of the
performance they put in against us in rnd 7....
I think (depending on how you play against us..) you'll be a huge show...
>
>
"Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f0d64f1_1@no-spam
>
> "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:yM1Pa.13$fe1.1133@no-spam
> > In Bris - no chance.
>
> SOME chance.. a good start always has brisbane players worrying.
Very faint hopes at best.
Disasterous news from the training track tonight. Some important players
were no shows at training including Everitt who will certainly miss the next
4 with ongoing hamstring trauma. Injury clouds hang over a few others.
Looks like the Hawks are going to have to rely on Stone to take on Brown
(eeek !!) and young Robbie Campbell to shoulder most of the ruck duties.
"JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
news:ePdPa.285$fe1.11739@no-spam
>
> "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f0d64f1_1@no-spam
> >
> > "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:yM1Pa.13$fe1.1133@no-spam
>
> > > In Bris - no chance.
> >
> > SOME chance.. a good start always has brisbane players worrying.
>
> Very faint hopes at best.
>
> Disasterous news from the training track tonight. Some important players
> were no shows at training including Everitt who will certainly miss the
next
> 4 with ongoing hamstring trauma. Injury clouds hang over a few others.
>
> Looks like the Hawks are going to have to rely on Stone to take on Brown
> (eeek !!) and young Robbie Campbell to shoulder most of the ruck duties.
Brissy don't have too many ruckman either...
Problem will be that Thompson will have to ruck some of the game.. and that
will stretch ur forwardline a bit.. (a lot actually).
"Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f0e2ccc_1@no-spam
>
> "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:ePdPa.285$fe1.11739@no-spam
> >
> > "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3f0d64f1_1@no-spam
> > >
> > > "JohnD." <johnd1967_spamthing_@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > news:yM1Pa.13$fe1.1133@no-spam
> >
> > > > In Bris - no chance.
> > >
> > > SOME chance.. a good start always has brisbane players worrying.
> >
> > Very faint hopes at best.
> >
> > Disasterous news from the training track tonight. Some important players
> > were no shows at training including Everitt who will certainly miss the
> next
> > 4 with ongoing hamstring trauma. Injury clouds hang over a few others.
> >
> > Looks like the Hawks are going to have to rely on Stone to take on Brown
> > (eeek !!) and young Robbie Campbell to shoulder most of the ruck duties.
>
> Brissy don't have too many ruckman either...
True, but "Everitt to Mitchell" is a combination that really works for the
Hawks. He may have won enough taps to win the midfield clearances. Now it's
break-even time in the ruck and a superior midfield will see Bris control
the game from the centre.
> Problem will be that Thompson will have to ruck some of the game.. and
that
> will stretch ur forwardline a bit.. (a lot actually).
If Campbell's getting done over in the ruck, Thomo might have to ruck a
whole heap yet.