Seņor Skase wrote:
> "deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3F0193B4.175C31DD@no-spam
>
>>"JohnD." wrote:
>>
>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>How do you figure Port have the most injured when the list you supplied
>>>shows three teams with a longer list of injured players ?
>>
>>The fact that he's a cretin might have a bit to do with it.
>>
>>deker19
>
>
> What's amusing is that many of you, including you Deks, are only here to try
> to hand out insults, when you are actually capable of using the information
> to get a discussion going.
Almost as amusing as the insults.
deker19
"deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f0931c5$0$403@no-spam
> Seņor Skase wrote:
> > "deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3F0193B4.175C31DD@no-spam
> >
> >>"JohnD." wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>[...]
> >>>
> >>>How do you figure Port have the most injured when the list you supplied
> >>>shows three teams with a longer list of injured players ?
> >>
> >>The fact that he's a cretin might have a bit to do with it.
> >>
> >>deker19
> >
> >
> > What's amusing is that many of you, including you Deks, are only here to
try
> > to hand out insults, when you are actually capable of using the
information
> > to get a discussion going.
>
> Almost as amusing as the insults.
>
> deker19
Only good insults are amusing; the rest are for the easily amused.
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 16:10:29 +0800
Seņor Skase wrote:
> "deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f0931c5$0$403@no-spam
>
>>Seņor Skase wrote:
>>
>>>"deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
>>>news:3F0193B4.175C31DD@no-spam
>>>
>>>
>>>>"JohnD." wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>
>>>>>How do you figure Port have the most injured when the list you supplied
>>>>>shows three teams with a longer list of injured players ?
>>>>
>>>>The fact that he's a cretin might have a bit to do with it.
>>>>
>>>>deker19
>>>
>>>
>>>What's amusing is that many of you, including you Deks, are only here to
>>
> try
>
>>>to hand out insults, when you are actually capable of using the
>>
> information
>
>>>to get a discussion going.
>>
>>Almost as amusing as the insults.
>>
>>deker19
>
> Only good insults are amusing; the rest are for the easily amused.
you're someone who deems amusing the idea of people handing out insults
instead of using "information" provided - so it's obvious you fall into
that "easily amused" category.... and no that's not an insult, just an
observation, albeit mildly amusing.
deker19
"deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f0a7d1e$0$408@no-spam
> >
> > Only good insults are amusing; the rest are for the easily amused.
>
> you're someone who deems amusing the idea of people handing out insults
> instead of using "information" provided - so it's obvious you fall into
> that "easily amused" category.... and no that's not an insult, just an
> observation, albeit mildly amusing.
>
> deker19
>
No Deks, you're trying too hard. Some insults are amusing. Most aren't.
There you go.