Seņor Skase wrote:
> "deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3F019530.9D8C7319@no-spam
>
>>Somefella wrote:
>>
>>
>>>For fucks sake... the bloke gets 3 free kicks (had 7 for the year and 24
>>>against coming into the match) and someone pisses and moans about it.
>>>
>>>Fuck you Grant Thomas... they were warrented..
>>
>>he's still an umps bum-chum. not to the extent of Wanga, but not far off,
>>and his thing is not the frees he gets, but rather the frees he gives away
>>but never gets called for. He's allowed an incredible amount of leniency
>>by the video judges too.
>>
>>deker19
>>
>
> Considering Neitz's free count the first part of you comment is not easily
> defensible. Considering that over the last 6 years, Wanganeen has received
> an average of just .66 free per game, actually below the average, the second
> part isn't neither.
Neitz's free's against/for count has nothing to do with what I'm saying
unless you think there is a quota players are allowed to fill. I'm
talking about what he's allowed to get away with. As for Wanga, I was
refering mainly to his time with Essendon.
deker19
"deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f093545$0$403@no-spam
> Seņor Skase wrote:
> > "deker19" <deker19@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3F019530.9D8C7319@no-spam
> >
> >>Somefella wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>For fucks sake... the bloke gets 3 free kicks (had 7 for the year and
24
> >>>against coming into the match) and someone pisses and moans about it.
> >>>
> >>>Fuck you Grant Thomas... they were warrented..
> >>
> >>he's still an umps bum-chum. not to the extent of Wanga, but not far
off,
> >>and his thing is not the frees he gets, but rather the frees he gives
away
> >>but never gets called for. He's allowed an incredible amount of
leniency
> >>by the video judges too.
> >>
> >>deker19
> >>
> >
> > Considering Neitz's free count the first part of you comment is not
easily
> > defensible. Considering that over the last 6 years, Wanganeen has
received
> > an average of just .66 free per game, actually below the average, the
second
> > part isn't neither.
>
> Neitz's free's against/for count has nothing to do with what I'm saying
> unless you think there is a quota players are allowed to fill. I'm
> talking about what he's allowed to get away with. As for Wanga, I was
> refering mainly to his time with Essendon.
>
> deker19
Either way, you have posted no evidence. Since it's pointless to argue about
opinion, thread over
"Seņor Skase" <senor_skase@no-spam> wrote in message
news:be15hj$59l$1@no-spam
>
> "Somefella" <footyrocks@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f040f3d_1@no-spam
>
> > > Considering Neitz's free count the first part of you comment is not
> easily
> > > defensible. Considering that over the last 6 years, Wanganeen has
> received
> > > an average of just .66 free per game, actually below the average, the
> > second
> > > part isn't neither.
> >
> > And I'm sure Wanganeen plays a key position and takes the #1 defender in
> > each team and is involved in a contested situation 100% of the time?
> >
> No, you are mistaken. Wanganeen is much more versatile.
It's not a question of versatility you fool...