On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Jeff wrote:
> Paul Cooper <pdcooper@no-spam> shat the following logs:
> the same
> >
> > that let a tackle go that hit Tate on the chin
>
> How could anyone miss?
Hehe too true. :-)
--
to reply, use "aDOTswannATqutDOTeduDOTau", but replace "DOT" with "." and
"AT with "@no-spam" (I'm sick of getting spam!!).
Jeff <jeff9011spammo@no-spam> whilst enjoying the feel of
that sweet, sweet wood moaned:
> Paul Cooper <pdcooper@no-spam> shat the following logs:
> the same
>>
>> that let a tackle go that hit Tate on the chin
>
> How could anyone miss?
It is a pretty big chin ... and he often leads with it.
Daniel.
Paul Cooper <pdcooper@no-spam> whilst enjoying the feel
of that sweet, sweet wood moaned:
> "Kav" <kav1@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:77nNa.2915$9f7.302600@no-spam
>> Paul Cooper wrote:
>>> "The original Me" <me@no-spam> wrote in message
>>> news:3f0568fd$0$31279$afc38c87@no-spam
>>>>
>>>> "Paul Cooper" <pdcooper@no-spam> wrote in message
>>>> news:yKdNa.599$R15.13927@no-spam
>>>>>
>>>>> "The original Me" <me@no-spam> wrote in message
>>>>> news:3f0566fa$0$31277$afc38c87@no-spam
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Paul Cooper" <pdcooper@no-spam> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:05dNa.569$R15.14325@no-spam
>>>>>>> An ideal chance to send a player off and takes a weak
>>>>>>> pathetic option.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are a deadset fuckhead Steve and should really get
>>>>>>> dropped.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not one option, but two and he takes the easy options.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are you talking about. There was really wrong with
>>>>>> either tackle.
>>>>>
>>>>> Turn off the GayFL and watch the league and you get the
>>>>> drift, that is of course you aren't a St George Illawarra
>>>>> Steve Clark Dragons supporter.
>>>>
>>>> The same steven clark who sent shaun timmins to the bin and
>>>> penalised jason ryles consistently for doing nothing last
>>>> weekend. Steven clark gives no favours to the dragons.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yep the same Steve Clark who ruled play on when the Dragons
>>> knocked the ball on (ball went forward, hit Carroll and
>>> rebounded back to the Saints player - clearly a knock on)
>>> and scored, the same Steve Clark who ruled a Kelly knock on
>>> when it came of the knee, the same Steve Clark that ruled a
>>> strip when it was clearly poor handling, the same Steve
>>> Clark that let a tackle go that hit Tate on the chin, the
>>> same Clark that didn't take any serious action against a
>>> swinging arm that connected or the same Clark that took no
>>> action against the gutless player who dropped the forearm
>>> into McGuire as he lay on the ground.
>>>
>>> Gimme a break tossers.
>>
>> Aren't you being a tad one-sided Paul?
>
> Not really. Let's be fair dinkum here Kav, a guy gets hit in
> the head and nothing happens. You back chat the referee and you
> get more punishment. Okay so the video review committee looks
> at the game on Monday. They cite a guy and he gets 2,3 or 4
> weeks. How does that help the Broncos or the team that
> the guy played against ? It doesn't.
Who says it's supposed to? The idea is to discourage other
players from tackling high ... its not a matter of rewarding
the Broncos its about punishing the Dragons.
The Broncos reward came in the form of a penalty what they
do with it is up to them.
Daniel.