Slippery Sam wrote:
> I think what this demonstrates, is how incredibly dumb your average
> Kiwi is, in comparison, to Mr Rats.
We're not dumb mate. Some of the smartest people in the world are Kiwis.
However, not having the highest IQ doesn't mean that you'll not be
successful. There's nothing like good, honest, hard yakka to reach your
goals!
Tim Scrivens wrote:
> But smarter than both were those like myself who had more interesting
> things to do with 2 hours of their lives.
Hence I conclude that Tim Scrivens is the smartest man in RSRU!
Tim Scrivens wrote:
> I suspect that Bobs is brighter than he looks. I am leaning towards
> the opinion that his last few years have seen the development of
> Usenet as a performance art medium.
I'd have to agree. Some of Bobs' posts are very colourful and only true
genius could achieve this.
> I'd have to agree. Some of Bobs' posts are very colourful and only true
> genius could achieve this.
Like Van Gogh, Picasso verging on lunacy ;0)
A
"Slippery Sam" <sonof@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f090471@no-spam
> Rats <Rats@no-spam> wrote:
> > Slippery Sam wrote:
> >> I think what this demonstrates, is how incredibly dumb your average
> >> Kiwi is, in comparison, to Mr Rats.
> >
> > We're not dumb mate. Some of the smartest people in the world are
> > Kiwis.
>
> It's just that the police keep cheating when they try to prove it?
>
> > However, not having the highest IQ doesn't mean that you'll
> > not be successful. There's nothing like good, honest, hard yakka to
> > reach your goals!
>
> Yes, but in Australia, we set our goals a bit higher than trying to root
our
> sisters:
>
> http://www.world-sex-records.com/sex-251.htm
>
> Sam
>
>
>
Listen Slippery Anus, Before the whiteman came to Australia
kangaroos used to walk.
Matua.
"Rats" <Rats@no-spam> wrote in message
news:beb504$3359o$1@no-spam
> Ernest the Sheep wrote:
> > Or perhaps you didn't want to take a proper test and find out how
> > dumb you really are!
>
> Ok, I decided to take the test they've got on the TV One website:
>
> http://testthenation.nzoom.com/story.html?story_mental_gym.inc
>
> My scores were:
>
> Language 9/10
8/10 ... and I think the reasoning behind at least one answer is bollocks.
"Birds of a feather flock together" implies similars attract. "Friends
will be friends" does not require any attractive force, but just posits that
it's the way it's always been - "every Jack will find his Jill" is a little
specific to relationships for a perfect fit but is a better mechnanica
description. Completely different reasoning. Honest :-)
> Memory 8/10
10/10
> Reasoning 9/10
10/10
> Spatial 9/10
10/10
> Arithmetic 10/10
10/10
p.s. don't bother adding up the digits - the questions are poorly set, so
it's enough to just add up the last digits for 2 through 5.
> That's a score of 45/50. I guessed a couple in the memory test.
The last of the memory tests was the only one I need to guess - and some of
those guesses come down to which one you subconciously remember anyway.
I can never get over just how bad those tests are ... they rely on far too
much non-"intelligence" information; the spatial stuff explicitly tells you
that you need to know physics!
Richard.