AUS TV 26 RE MELBOURNE HACKING DOCUMENTARY
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:01:29 +1000

From: Dave Horsfall (daveh@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Melbourne hacking documentary

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Fish! wrote:

[ Massive quoted text deleted ]

> > Could you please re-phrase that in English? Your written skills (as > > no doubt your inter-personal skills) are terrible.
>
> It is in English. Once again though, you're so busy with your head > stuck up your arse, you've forgotten to address my point.

Was *what* in English? The post which you included, along with many irrelevant prior posts? To be sure, it used English words, but English it was *not*.

> Oh and do try to say something original. You seem to have this weird > need to repeat yourself, and with the shit you're spouting it's really > quite sad that you're drawing further attention to it.

Which weird need would this be? The bit where I need to use emphasis in order to draw attention to an autistic specimen such as yourself?

-- Dave

Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:09:14 +1000
From: Dave Horsfall (daveh@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Melbourne hacking documentary

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Fish! wrote:

> > > > I would say that Mr/Ms Fish! is a little dyslexic hirself...
> > >
> > > In fact, you seem to find it hard to stop yourself saying anything, no > > > matter how lame.
> >
> > Which connects with my post... how, exactly?
> >
> Let me see. You posted, (what I can only imagine is to you an insult) a
Is not the word "opinion" in your vocabulary?

> one line reply, for the sole point of trying to make yourself appear to > be amusing and oh so witty.

Do you have a problem with one-line replies? If so, your inter-personal communication skills must be sorely lacking.

> I mean, you're just being pathetic now.

I mean, this connects with my post... how, exactly?

-- Dave

Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:25:18 +1000
From: Dave Horsfall (daveh@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Melbourne hacking documentary

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Fish! wrote:

> > > Once again, the defender of the stupid leaps to their aide. You're > > > really not this stupid are you?
> >
> > Why would I want to leap to anyone's aide? And whose aide are we talking > > about? Your literacy skills are truly abysmal.
>
> Are they, in what way? Please enlighten me, so that I too may one day > aspire to your level of arrogance.

Your acknowledgement of your superiors is commendable, but we still have to work upon your basic comprehension skills.

> If you weren't leaping to Craig's defence then what the fuck WERE you > doing?

Hint: look up the difference 'tween "aid" and "aide". Umm, it involves a big book of words, so you might need someone to help you in this endeavour.

Another hint: I may leap to someone's aid, but I'll definitely leap to someone's aide if she's pretty enough.

> > > I mean what the FUCK was that post of yours about?
> >
> > Re-read it again; it might come to you one day.
>
> Hahah, even YOU don't know what the hell you're on about. Nice > handball.

The delusion would appear to be in your own mind. And where do handballs come into it (apart from your hand on possibly yours)?

-- Dave