http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/politics/politics-pakistan-usa.html?pagewanted=print&position=
Of course the New Republicans/neoCONS will see nothing at all amiss
with giving $3Billion of our tax dollars to Pakistan, afterall its not
THEIR tax dollars, they don't pay any anymore.
Why would anyone object anyway? Pakistan is our best l'il buddy.
Just because it harbors Mullah Omar, OSAMA bin LADEN and al Zwahiri
out there in its western provinces, and has nukes that it threatens
other nations with, these things should not be held against them.
Bush has said they are friends, so by damned they are our friends, and
we all know that a Bush would never lie? Right?
Folks, you just gotta dig into the piggy banks and start sending those
pretzels to the Whitehouse. The country can't handle to much more of
this bunches activities.
-=Monte=-
The solution is simple, send pretzels to the Whitehouse!
In article <3ef89275.23391656@no-spam>, Monte wrote:
> Folks, you just gotta dig into the piggy banks and start sending those
> pretzels to the Whitehouse. The country can't handle to much more of
> this bunches activities.
Yet more people still under the delusion that one party or the other
makes a difference. Hint: It doesn't. It's 6 of one, half a dozen of
the other. The excuses are different, the results are the same. They
may look different, but the differences are but skin deep, the goals
of each are essentially the same.
Would you like to lose your right or left leg? That is the kind of
choice the two party system gives us.
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:34:54 GMT, tetraethyllead@no-spam (Brent P)
wrote:
>In article <3ef89275.23391656@no-spam>, Monte wrote:
>
>> Folks, you just gotta dig into the piggy banks and start sending those
>> pretzels to the Whitehouse. The country can't handle to much more of
>> this bunches activities.
>
>Yet more people still under the delusion that one party or the other
>makes a difference. Hint: It doesn't. It's 6 of one, half a dozen of
>the other. The excuses are different, the results are the same. They
>may look different, but the differences are but skin deep, the goals
>of each are essentially the same.
>
>Would you like to lose your right or left leg? That is the kind of
>choice the two party system gives us.
>
and that is PRECISELY the problem, people just quit! Lazy goddam
sonsuvbitches won't even go to the polls and vote each group out every
four years. No, the lazy motherfuckers would rather sit on their
asses and bitch, bitch and complain. Well the bunch in the whitehouse
this time are a different strain than the common vermin we have become
used to in the past 200 years. these bastards are NOT supporteres of
this nation, these bastards do NOT believe in 'rule of law' and a
constitutional government. Radical ranting? Take a real relaxed turn
through ALL the papers that this bunch have authored in the past 20
years, then look at all the events and all the methods they have used
to deal with those events. Then come back and tell us all is 'same
old, same old'.
Get off your ass, register, and then vote against every single goddamn
incumbent on that ballot. If the sonofabitch is unopposed write in a
dead guys name. Hell, that worked to defeat that fucking Ashcroft in
Missouri Senate race it will work nationally just as well.
-=Monte=-
The solution is simple, send pretzels to the Whitehouse!
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:18:05 GMT
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:34:54 +0000, Brent P wrote:
> In article <3ef89275.23391656@no-spam>, Monte wrote:
>
>> Folks, you just gotta dig into the piggy banks and start sending those
>> pretzels to the Whitehouse. The country can't handle to much more of
>> this bunches activities.
>
> Yet more people still under the delusion that one party or the other
> makes a difference. Hint: It doesn't. It's 6 of one, half a dozen of
You've got to be living under a rock for the last 6 years if you think
this. Or maybe you get your news from Faux or the pig-boy. Or maybe you
just can't be bothered to tune in anymore; in which case you'd be in the
majority.
In article <b3acd209ba018ec2e267f287c993d66b@no-spam>, Nexus7 wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:34:54 +0000, Brent P wrote:
>
>> In article <3ef89275.23391656@no-spam>, Monte wrote:
>>
>>> Folks, you just gotta dig into the piggy banks and start sending those
>>> pretzels to the Whitehouse. The country can't handle to much more of
>>> this bunches activities.
>>
>> Yet more people still under the delusion that one party or the other
>> makes a difference. Hint: It doesn't. It's 6 of one, half a dozen of
>
> You've got to be living under a rock for the last 6 years if you think
> this. Or maybe you get your news from Faux or the pig-boy. Or maybe you
> just can't be bothered to tune in anymore; in which case you'd be in the
> majority.
Look more than skin deep. Sure their reasoning appears different, it's
the end result that's the same. Does it matter that one party supports
manufacturing in china because it helps their corporate contributors or
that the other because they got contributions from china? It's the net
effect that is no different between the parties. The best thing for
the people is for them to fight each other to deadlock on their trivial
surface differences because that is the only thing that keeps the
progression slow and holds them in check.
I really don't care if say a new law that takes away some of our liberty
gets the excuse of preventing guns from getting in the hands of criminals
(D) or is given the excuse of fighting terrorism (R). The excuse
doesn't matter only that the people loose liberty matters. Same net
effect regardless of the party.
We need a "None of the Above" box.
I'm serious: Go back and find someone else.
Draft Warren Buffet with Donald Trump for VP.
Then I could stop voting for Lyndon; or Ralph.
H.
"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@no-spam> wrote in message
news:aj3Ka.11091$3d.6746@no-spam
> In article <3ef8b9ba.33445500@no-spam>, Monte wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:34:54 GMT, tetraethyllead@no-spam (Brent P)
wrote:
>
> >>Would you like to lose your right or left leg? That is the kind of
> >>choice the two party system gives us.
>
> > and that is PRECISELY the problem, people just quit! Lazy goddam
> > sonsuvbitches won't even go to the polls and vote each group out every
> > four years. No, the lazy motherfuckers would rather sit on their
> > asses and bitch, bitch and complain. Well the bunch in the whitehouse
> > this time are a different strain than the common vermin we have become
> > used to in the past 200 years. these bastards are NOT supporteres of
> > this nation, these bastards do NOT believe in 'rule of law' and a
> > constitutional government. Radical ranting? Take a real relaxed turn
> > through ALL the papers that this bunch have authored in the past 20
> > years, then look at all the events and all the methods they have used
> > to deal with those events. Then come back and tell us all is 'same
> > old, same old'.
>
> You just described the previous adminstration too.
>
> > Get off your ass, register, and then vote against every single goddamn
> > incumbent on that ballot. If the sonofabitch is unopposed write in a
> > dead guys name. Hell, that worked to defeat that fucking Ashcroft in
> > Missouri Senate race it will work nationally just as well.
>
> Misguided personal attack? I vote, even though the choices suck.
>
>
>
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:23:18 GMT, tetraethyllead@no-spam (Brent P)
wrote:
>In article <3ef8b9ba.33445500@no-spam>, Monte wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:34:54 GMT, tetraethyllead@no-spam (Brent P) wrote:
>
>>>Would you like to lose your right or left leg? That is the kind of
>>>choice the two party system gives us.
>
>> and that is PRECISELY the problem, people just quit! Lazy goddam
>> sonsuvbitches won't even go to the polls and vote each group out every
>> four years. No, the lazy motherfuckers would rather sit on their
>> asses and bitch, bitch and complain. Well the bunch in the whitehouse
>> this time are a different strain than the common vermin we have become
>> used to in the past 200 years. these bastards are NOT supporteres of
>> this nation, these bastards do NOT believe in 'rule of law' and a
>> constitutional government. Radical ranting? Take a real relaxed turn
>> through ALL the papers that this bunch have authored in the past 20
>> years, then look at all the events and all the methods they have used
>> to deal with those events. Then come back and tell us all is 'same
>> old, same old'.
>
>You just described the previous adminstration too.
>
>> Get off your ass, register, and then vote against every single goddamn
>> incumbent on that ballot. If the sonofabitch is unopposed write in a
>> dead guys name. Hell, that worked to defeat that fucking Ashcroft in
>> Missouri Senate race it will work nationally just as well.
>
>Misguided personal attack? I vote, even though the choices suck.
>
Good on you!<grin> Well then by lee gawds you can say any DAMN thing
you want about politics around me. ;)
Obviously I have run out of patience with those who do not vote. See
ya at the polls.
-=Monte=-
The solution is simple, send pretzels to the Whitehouse!
Mapanari wrote:
>
> SendGeeDumbya@no-spam (Monte) babbled and bored us in
> news:3ef89275.23391656@no-spam
>
> > http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/politics/politics-pakistan-usa.html?pagewa
> > nted=print&position=
> >
> > Of course the New Republicans/neoCONS will see nothing at all amiss
> > with giving $3Billion of our tax dollars to Pakistan, afterall its not
> > THEIR tax dollars, they don't pay any anymore.
> >
> > Why would anyone object anyway? Pakistan is our best l'il buddy.
> > Just because it harbors Mullah Omar, OSAMA bin LADEN and al Zwahiri
> > out there in its western provinces, and has nukes that it threatens
> > other nations with, these things should not be held against them.
> > Bush has said they are friends, so by damned they are our friends, and
> > we all know that a Bush would never lie? Right?
> >
> > Folks, you just gotta dig into the piggy banks and start sending those
> > pretzels to the Whitehouse. The country can't handle to much more of
> > this bunches activities.
> >
> >
> > -=Monte=-
> > The solution is simple, send pretzels to the Whitehouse!
> >
>
> Well, it's pretty simple from where I stand....American Veterans are less
> important than arab ragheads who mostly hate us anyways.
>
> I guess in America being a beggar is better pay than serving your country!
>
> It's a matter of priorities...welfare people, the lazy and stupid, beggars,
> foriegners, illegal aliens, pork barrels, everything is more important than
> the middle class and veterans.
>
> RE: Bush cutting vet benefits of a couple months ago.
>
> --
> -Mapi
>
> The Mapanari of Usenet.
What is even worse was the 15 billion to Africa to fight AIDs...
--
Regards,
JT (Residing in Austin, Texas)
Just Tooling Down The Internet Superhighway With my G4.......
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:26:48 GMT
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:34:20 +0000, Brent P wrote:
> that the other because they got contributions from china? It's the net
> effect that is no different between the parties.
One has to only look at the dramatic downturn of events since Jan 2000 to
see that the net effect is very different. The things that comparatively
don't matter are in fact the ones that are similar, such as pet projects
and extra-marital affairs. Mentioning contributions works against your
argument, because the Party of God has in fact an order of magnitude of
advantage there; corporations and wealthy individuals who stand to gain
from a diversion of wealth from the poor contribute the big soft money...
star wars, tort "reform", deregulation, etc.
>The best thing for
> the people is for them to fight each other to deadlock on their trivial
> surface differences because that is the only thing that keeps the
> progression slow and holds them in check.
Our objective is hopefully to have progress. It doesn't matter a whole lot
to me if an agriculture sec'y get a free plane ride, as long as
unemployment is kept down.
> I really don't care if say a new law that takes away some of our liberty
> gets the excuse of preventing guns from getting in the hands of
> criminals (D)
The situation with guns is so extreme that regulation is called; since we
do not live in Afghanistan (unless the Party of God has its way).
> for or is given the excuse of fighting terrorism (R). The excuse doesn't
> matter only that the people loose liberty matters. Same net effect
> regardless of the party.
Of course there've been major breaches in liberties at the instance of the
whore court, the misadministration, and your neighborhood Party of God
legislator; but the people who hated the 8 years of peace and prosperity
under Clinton, such as the libertarians and naderites are the ones who are
the most accepting of them.
JETman <jetassoc@no-spam> babbled and bored us in
news:3EF8E5E8.8B0BA2DE@no-spam
>
>
> Mapanari wrote:
>>
>> SendGeeDumbya@no-spam (Monte) babbled and bored us in
>> news:3ef89275.23391656@no-spam
>>
>> > http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/politics/politics-pakistan-usa.html?pag
>> > ewa nted=print&position=
>> >
>> > Of course the New Republicans/neoCONS will see nothing at all amiss
>> > with giving $3Billion of our tax dollars to Pakistan, afterall its
>> > not THEIR tax dollars, they don't pay any anymore.
>> >
>> > Why would anyone object anyway? Pakistan is our best l'il buddy.
>> > Just because it harbors Mullah Omar, OSAMA bin LADEN and al Zwahiri
>> > out there in its western provinces, and has nukes that it threatens
>> > other nations with, these things should not be held against them.
>> > Bush has said they are friends, so by damned they are our friends,
>> > and we all know that a Bush would never lie? Right?
>> >
>> > Folks, you just gotta dig into the piggy banks and start sending
>> > those pretzels to the Whitehouse. The country can't handle to much
>> > more of this bunches activities.
>> >
>> >
>> > -=Monte=-
>> > The solution is simple, send pretzels to the Whitehouse!
>> >
>>
>> Well, it's pretty simple from where I stand....American Veterans are
>> less important than arab ragheads who mostly hate us anyways.
>>
>> I guess in America being a beggar is better pay than serving your
>> country!
>>
>> It's a matter of priorities...welfare people, the lazy and stupid,
>> beggars, foriegners, illegal aliens, pork barrels, everything is more
>> important than the middle class and veterans.
>>
>> RE: Bush cutting vet benefits of a couple months ago.
>>
>> --
>> -Mapi
>>
>> The Mapanari of Usenet.
>
>
>
> What is even worse was the 15 billion to Africa to fight AIDs...
>
>
>
Keep the kids alive long enough to reach sexual maturation, so they can have
another bigger crop of future American dollars recipients.
Remember, the worse plague in Africa who have killed more people in all of
history has always been the white doctor.
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.