AZ GENERAL 38 RE STUPID LESLIE SETH HAMMOND
From: Little John (jammin1@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Stupid Leslie Seth Hammond
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 04:33:38 -0700


On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 08:56:49 +0100, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
"nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> two-fingered to all:

|>
|>"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message |>
|>> |>> |>That was done by the Americans in the 1800s, see your own history |>for |>> |>> |>details.
|>> |>>
|>> |>> That's a total lie, poo-boy, and you damned well know it.
|>> |>
|>> |>What lie would that be?
|>>
|>> The one you typed, poo-boy.
|>
|>So you think that no Native Americans were killed in the 1800s?

You're not weaseling out of this one again, poo-boy. You constantly do this.
You claim one extreme (the US killed most of the Indians), and when bitch slapped for the stupidity of the statement, you jump to the other extreme (the US killed some Indians). No more poo-shuffle, bitch boy. Most is not equivalent to any. Most is not equivalent to some. Most is equivalent to a majority. Considering the majority had already been wiped out at the hands of you and your fellow peans, your claims suck swamp gas.

|>> |>> Of the more than 22 million that were here when the Italian landed,
|>only 2
|>> |>million were left in |>> |>> 1775. That's not just in what would become the US, but in both of the |>> |>> continents of the Americas, and the various nearby islands.
|>> |>
|>> |>" in the words of historian Tomas Almaquer, "the California state |>government |>> |>launched a systematic policy of sanctioned decimation." In January 1851,
|>> |>Gov. Peter H. Burnett's message to the California legislature read, "A |>war |>> |>of extermination will continue to be waged between the two races until |>the |>> |>Indian race becomes extinct." (California had a bounty on Indians that |>> |>lasted until the last decades of the 19th century. In one year alone the |>> |>State of California paid out $1 million to people who had killed Native |>> |>Californian Indians. WFI) A startling drop in native population ensued.
|>In |>> |>1848 perhaps 150,000 Indians lived in California, compared to about |>15,000
|>> |>non-Indians, mostly Mexican Californians. Ten years later just 16,000
|>> |>Indians were left. "
|>>
|>> You seem intent on calling up points of thousands, while ignoring points |>of |>> millions, poo-boy. Why is that? Can't argue against the facts, so you |>attempt |>> to shift focus, as in do the poo-shuffle?
|>
|>That was just one state in a 10 year period.

Poo, as dense as you often show yourself to be, even you can't be dense enough so as not to understand the basics of the debate and your untenable position therein.

|>In the 1800s your country carried out possibly the greatest genocide the |>world has ever seen.

That is pure bullshit. I will not deny that attrocities occurred within the US after its inception. Only a fool would even attempt as much. But, if we're going to point fingers and shout "genocide", let's do it properly. Let's compare numbers of people and tribes, or, to use the PC term, ethnic groups,
eliminated.
|>> 20 million, poo-boy. That's how many of my ancestors you and the rest of |>the |>> 'peans slaughtered and destroyed. Twenty thousand thousand. And you |>attempt to |>> compare a few tens of thousands? Lame, even for you, p'uta'k.
|>
|>You always need someone else to blame, face it, you Americans did the |>killing.

Another poo-boy lie.
|>> |>> What the US did to my people was a drop in the bucket to what you lot |>did.
|>> |>
|>> |>So says a guilty American.
|>>
|>> Excuse me, ch'tkt'u?
|>
|>So says a guilty American.

You are exactly what I said you are.
jammin1 at jammin1 dot com
If you ain't in bed by 11...Go home!


From: "nick" (pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Stupid Leslie Seth Hammond
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 12:59:56 +0100

"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
> |>> |>What lie would that be?
> |>>
> |>> The one you typed, poo-boy.
> |>
> |>So you think that no Native Americans were killed in the 1800s?
>
> You're not weaseling out of this one again, poo-boy. You constantly do this.
> You claim one extreme (the US killed most of the Indians),

Which you did.

> and when bitch slapped for the stupidity of the statement,

You've been bitch slapped by histoty, fatboy.

> you jump to the other extreme (the US killed some Indians).

You killed most of them.

> No more poo-shuffle, bitch boy. Most is not > equivalent to any. Most is not equivalent to some. Most is equivalent to a > majority. Considering the majority had already been wiped out at the hands of > you and your fellow peans, your claims suck swamp gas.

You (America) embarked on a systematic attempt to exterminate the Native Americans during the 1800s, to the extent that rewards were given to those who took part in the ethnic cleansing, who you continue to pretend that this did not happen when it is thoroughly documented is a mystery.

You are a liar and a fool.

> |>> |>> Of the more than 22 million that were here when the Italian landed,
> |>only 2
> |>> |>million were left in > |>> |>> 1775. That's not just in what would become the US, but in both of the > |>> |>> continents of the Americas, and the various nearby islands.
> |>> |>
> |>> |>" in the words of historian Tomas Almaquer, "the California state > |>government > |>> |>launched a systematic policy of sanctioned decimation." In January 1851,
> |>> |>Gov. Peter H. Burnett's message to the California legislature read,
"A > |>war > |>> |>of extermination will continue to be waged between the two races until > |>the > |>> |>Indian race becomes extinct." (California had a bounty on Indians that > |>> |>lasted until the last decades of the 19th century. In one year alone the > |>> |>State of California paid out $1 million to people who had killed Native > |>> |>Californian Indians. WFI) A startling drop in native population ensued.
> |>In > |>> |>1848 perhaps 150,000 Indians lived in California, compared to about > |>15,000
> |>> |>non-Indians, mostly Mexican Californians. Ten years later just 16,000
> |>> |>Indians were left. "
> |>>
> |>> You seem intent on calling up points of thousands, while ignoring points > |>of > |>> millions, poo-boy. Why is that? Can't argue against the facts, so you > |>attempt > |>> to shift focus, as in do the poo-shuffle?
> |>
> |>That was just one state in a 10 year period.
>
> Poo, as dense as you often show yourself to be, even you can't be dense enough > so as not to understand the basics of the debate and your untenable position > therein.

I have fact and history on my side, you, my fat friend, are desperately trying to avoid both fact and your countries grisly history.

> |>In the 1800s your country carried out possibly the greatest genocide the > |>world has ever seen.
>
> That is pure bullshit.

Where did the all the Indians go then?

Are they hiding?

> I will not deny that attrocities occurred within the US > after its inception. Only a fool would even attempt as much. But, if we're > going to point fingers and shout "genocide", let's do it properly. Let's > compare numbers of people and tribes, or, to use the PC term, ethnic groups,
> eliminated.

150,000 Indians lived in California in 1848, ten years later just 16,000
were left.

You don't consider that genocide?

> |>> 20 million, poo-boy. That's how many of my ancestors you and the rest of > |>the > |>> 'peans slaughtered and destroyed. Twenty thousand thousand. And you > |>attempt to > |>> compare a few tens of thousands? Lame, even for you, p'uta'k.
> |>
> |>You always need someone else to blame, face it, you Americans did the > |>killing.
>
> Another poo-boy lie.

"In 1864 Col Chivington ( a former clergyman that had political ambitions)
was appointed the territorial military commander in Colorado. After some isolated incidents with the Indians, Chivington sent out detachments to burn and destroy Indian villages, the Cheyenne, Arapahos, Sioux, Kiowa's, and Comanches's struck back. this give Chivington the opportunity that he was looking for, to launch a full scale attack on the Indians."

"On November 29, 1864, Chivington deployed his command, about seven hundred solders with howitzers around Black Kettle's village on Sand Creek. Black Kettle was under the impression that he was at peace with the Americans; he ran up the American Flag and assured his people that all was well. the troops opened fire and charged. The Indians scattered in all directions.
Chivington had made it clear that he wanted no prisoners, hie policy was "to kill and scalp all, little and big". Nits make lice he was fond of saying."

"About a week prior to the slaughter at Wounded Knee, L.Frank Baum, editor of South Dakota's Aberdeen Saturday Pioneer newspaper advocated the extermination of all America's Indians. Quote; The nobility of the Redskin is extinquished and what few are left are a pack of whining curs who lick the hand that smites them. The whites by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians."

"Some U.S. government officials even promoted the destruction of the bison herds as a way to defeat their Native American enemies, who were resisting the takeover of their lands by white settlers. One Congressman, James Throckmorton of Texas, believed that "it would be a great step forward in the civilization of the Indians and the preservation of peace on the border if there was not a buffalo in existence." Soon, military commanders were ordering their troops to kill buffalo -- not for food, but to deny Native Americans their own source of food. One general believed that buffalo hunters "did more to defeat the Indian nations in a few years than soldiers did in 50." By 1880, the slaughter was almost over. Where millions of buffalo once roamed, only a few thousand animals remained. Soon, their numbers dwindled, with the largest wild herd -- just a few hundred animals -- "

"It's not well known, but the BIA for years subsidized an educational program intended to alienate Native American youngsters from their parents.
Starting in the 1800s and ending only in 1944, Morman missionaries were used to "kidnap" children and take them to Utah to get educated. Indian children were often rounded up at the age of 6 and not returned home until the age of 18. This kind of practice is more typical of totalitarian regimes, and is,
in fact, referred to as an act of genocide in the 1948 U.N. Declaration of Human Rights."

How many bitch slaps can you take LJ?