On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:04:23 +0100, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
"nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
|>
|>"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
|>
|>> |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
|>> |>> >>
|>> |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
|>> |>> >
|>> |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
|>> |>>
|>> |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
|>> |>
|>> |>You don't think their message was clear?
|>>
|>> More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other as
|>proof.
|>
|>So there was no war with Japan?
The question was, "When did the Japanese declare war on us?". You cited an act
of war as a declaration of war, then tried to do the usual poo-shuffle to cover
for your idiocy. A declaration of war is a specific happening, poo-boy. Did
Japan make a formal declaration of war? Not an attack. Not an act of war. A
formal declaration of war. Yes or no?
jammin1 at jammin1 dot com
If you ain't in bed by 11...Go home!
"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
> |>> |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
> |>> |>> >>
> |>> |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
> |>> |>> >
> |>> |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
> |>> |>>
> |>> |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
> |>> |>
> |>> |>You don't think their message was clear?
> |>>
> |>> More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other as
> |>proof.
> |>
> |>So there was no war with Japan?
>
> The question was, "When did the Japanese declare war on us?".
When they bombed your stolen base, do I need to explain everything to you?
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:12:20 +0100, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
"nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
|>
|>"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
|>
|>> |>> |>Who started the Bombing Of Britain?
|>> |>>
|>> |>> Germany
|>> |>>
|>> |>> |>Who conducted the Bombing Of Britain?
|>> |>>
|>> |>> Germany
|>> |>>
|>> |>> |>Who crushed opposition to the Bombing Of Britain?
|>> |>>
|>> |>> Germany
|>> |>
|>> |>Nobody.
|>>
|>> The RAF had how many boys and toys at the beginning, and how many at the
|>end?
|>
|>Not as many, you don't have as many tanks as you started out with in Iraq.
Like there's even a hint of a comparison there.
|>> Germany crushed the opposition to the BoB.
|>
|>Yet it lost, why do you and Phuxie argue against well documented historical
|>facts?
Why do you continuously fail to read and comprehend the words I write, even when
I write them as simply as possible to help you along?
|>> |>> |>Who ended the Bombing Of Britain?
|>> |>>
|>> |>> Germany
|>> |>
|>> |>England.
|>>
|>> A weak claim, even for you, poo-boy.
|>
|>Germany attacked us, we fought them off, they abandoned their plans for an
|>invasion, and instead attacked Russia, thus losing the war.
No, they attacked Russia simultaniously, then discovered Russia was a far
greater foe than anticipated, making it impossible to continue on both fronts.
It was a stupid decision on their part that allowed your survival.
|>> The RAF did not force Germany to stop.
|>
|>You're a lunatic.
They didn't.
|>> Only a twit could claim otherwise.
|>
|>So Germany actually won WW2?
Never said that. Of course, you've been far too busy reading what you think
I've said to read what I've actually said.
|>> |>> |>WHO won BOB?
|>> |>>
|>> |>> Nobody.
|>> |>
|>> |>England.
|>
|>> Britain, for all intents and purposes lost BoB.
|>
|>????
|>
|>Germany decided to invade the UK, Operation Sealion, to acheive this they
|>needed to destory the RAF and the radar stations.
The RAF was one good German airstrike away from decimated.
|>Thus the Battle of Britain, which they lost, forcing them to abandon
|>Operation Sealion, and insted attack Russia, which lost them the war.
Technically incorrect, but the end is the same, which I've never contested.
|>> Two things saved your sorry asses, the ill advised war against Russia on
|>their home turf in winter, and
|>> Japan's attack on the US. Russia depleated German resources, causing a
|>halt to
|>> the attack on Britain as the resources used on Britain were shifted to the
|>> Russian front. And all along, the US was sending millions of tons of
|>supplies
|>> to you and Russia. And then, Japan made their move, causing Hitler to
|>declare
|>> war on the US. And the kid gloves were off. If you wish to call
|>surviving
|>> until the cavalry arrives winning, go for it. Just don't expect the rest
|>of the
|>> world to join you. Hey, I'll give you guys your props, you were like a
|>Timex,
|>> you took a licking and kept on ticking, but that's hardly a claim of
|>victory.
|>> Heck, by that definition, many of the NA tribes won too, since they
|>survived.
|>
|>Note above took place after we had won the Battle of Britain.
I'll note nothing of the sort. I don't make note of revisionist history.
|>> |>See history books for details.
|>
|>> I've seen them.
|>
|>Find some better ones then.
No need.
|>> I've also seen video and heard audio. I've seen operational
|>> plans from all sides. I've spoken to countless veterans from many of the
|>> countries involved. History is written by the victors. You just happened
|>to be
|>> lucky enough to be on the winning side, so you could write it to seem
|>better
|>> than it was.
|>
|>We were the winning side, the end.
I've said that several times now, poo-boy. Do try to pay attention.
jammin1 at jammin1 dot com
If you ain't in bed by 11...Go home!
"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
> |>> The RAF had how many boys and toys at the beginning, and how many at
the
> |>end?
> |>
> |>Not as many, you don't have as many tanks as you started out with in
Iraq.
>
> Like there's even a hint of a comparison there.
Because our troops are professionals.
> |>> Germany crushed the opposition to the BoB.
> |>
> |>Yet it lost, why do you and Phuxie argue against well documented
historical
> |>facts?
>
> Why do you continuously fail to read and comprehend the words I write,
even when
> I write them as simply as possible to help you along?
Because you don't know what you're talking about.
> |>> |>> |>Who ended the Bombing Of Britain?
> |>> |>>
> |>> |>> Germany
> |>> |>
> |>> |>England.
> |>>
> |>> A weak claim, even for you, poo-boy.
> |>
> |>Germany attacked us, we fought them off, they abandoned their plans for
an
> |>invasion, and instead attacked Russia, thus losing the war.
> No, they attacked Russia simultaniously, then discovered Russia was a far
> greater foe than anticipated, making it impossible to continue on both
fronts.
> It was a stupid decision on their part that allowed your survival.
Battle of Britain 1940
June 1941 Hitler invades Russia
You lie again.
> |>> The RAF did not force Germany to stop.
> |>
> |>You're a lunatic.
>
> They didn't.
They did!
> |>> Only a twit could claim otherwise.
> |>
> |>So Germany actually won WW2?
>
> Never said that. Of course, you've been far too busy reading what you
think
> I've said to read what I've actually said.
>
> |>> |>> |>WHO won BOB?
> |>> |>>
> |>> |>> Nobody.
> |>> |>
> |>> |>England.
> |>
> |>> Britain, for all intents and purposes lost BoB.
> |>
> |>????
> |>
> |>Germany decided to invade the UK, Operation Sealion, to acheive this
they
> |>needed to destory the RAF and the radar stations.
>
> The RAF was one good German airstrike away from decimated.
Only in your twisted fantasies.
> |>Thus the Battle of Britain, which they lost, forcing them to abandon
> |>Operation Sealion, and insted attack Russia, which lost them the war.
>
> Technically incorrect,
In what way?
> but the end is the same, which I've never contested.
>
> |>> Two things saved your sorry asses, the ill advised war against Russia
on
> |>their home turf in winter, and
> |>> Japan's attack on the US. Russia depleated German resources, causing
a
> |>halt to
> |>> the attack on Britain as the resources used on Britain were shifted to
the
> |>> Russian front. And all along, the US was sending millions of tons of
> |>supplies
> |>> to you and Russia. And then, Japan made their move, causing Hitler to
> |>declare
> |>> war on the US. And the kid gloves were off. If you wish to call
> |>surviving
> |>> until the cavalry arrives winning, go for it. Just don't expect the
rest
> |>of the
> |>> world to join you. Hey, I'll give you guys your props, you were like
a
> |>Timex,
> |>> you took a licking and kept on ticking, but that's hardly a claim of
> |>victory.
> |>> Heck, by that definition, many of the NA tribes won too, since they
> |>survived.
> |>
> |>Note above took place after we had won the Battle of Britain.
>
> I'll note nothing of the sort. I don't make note of revisionist history.
You just post it.
> |>> |>See history books for details.
> |>
> |>> I've seen them.
> |>
> |>Find some better ones then.
>
> No need.
See your own misguided rantings.
> |>> I've also seen video and heard audio. I've seen operational
> |>> plans from all sides. I've spoken to countless veterans from many of
the
> |>> countries involved. History is written by the victors. You just
happened
> |>to be
> |>> lucky enough to be on the winning side, so you could write it to seem
> |>better
> |>> than it was.
> |>
> |>We were the winning side, the end.
>
> I've said that several times now, poo-boy.
"Britain, for all intents and purposes lost BoB"
"nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> wrote in message
news:tDlLa.673$Zr2.121@no-spam
>
> "Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
>
> > |>> |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
> > |>> |>> >>
> > |>> |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
> > |>> |>> >
> > |>> |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
> > |>> |>>
> > |>> |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
> > |>> |>
> > |>> |>You don't think their message was clear?
> > |>>
> > |>> More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other as
> > |>proof.
> > |>
> > |>So there was no war with Japan?
> >
> > The question was, "When did the Japanese declare war on us?".
>
> When they bombed your stolen base, do I need to explain everything to you?
Evidently. Who stole it from us and how'd we get it back?
Are you on crack?
"nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> wrote in message
news:XZlLa.723$Zr2.155@no-spam
>
> "Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
>
> > |>> The RAF had how many boys and toys at the beginning, and how many at
> the
> > |>end?
> > |>
> > |>Not as many, you don't have as many tanks as you started out with in
> Iraq.
> >
> > Like there's even a hint of a comparison there.
>
> Because our troops are professionals.
So are whores, but paid for fucking things up. Your troops do it because
it's all they know.
"Phxbrd" <phxbrd@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > |>> |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
> > > |>> |>> >>
> > > |>> |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
> > > |>> |>> >
> > > |>> |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
> > > |>> |>>
> > > |>> |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
> > > |>> |>
> > > |>> |>You don't think their message was clear?
> > > |>>
> > > |>> More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other
as
> > > |>proof.
> > > |>
> > > |>So there was no war with Japan?
> > >
> > > The question was, "When did the Japanese declare war on us?".
> >
> > When they bombed your stolen base, do I need to explain everything to
you?
>
> Evidently.
Is anyone surprised?
"Phxbrd" <phxbrd@no-spam> wrote in message
news:6AoLa.16900$C83.1586959@no-spam
>
> "nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:XZlLa.723$Zr2.155@no-spam
> >
> > "Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
> >
> > > |>> The RAF had how many boys and toys at the beginning, and how many
at
> > the
> > > |>end?
> > > |>
> > > |>Not as many, you don't have as many tanks as you started out with in
> > Iraq.
> > >
> > > Like there's even a hint of a comparison there.
> >
> > Because our troops are professionals.
>
> So are whores, but paid for fucking things up. Your troops do it because
> it's all they know.
Hammond, you are a pathetic old man who is fast running out of time. I hope
you choke on your Lipitor.
In article <3cnrfv4tcvksoes5irdfqr6gp23b5a48v7@no-spam>,
Little John <jammin1@no-spam> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:04:23 +0100, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
> once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
> "nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
>
> |>
> |>"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
> |>
> |>> |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
> |>> |>> >>
> |>> |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
> |>> |>> >
> |>> |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
> |>> |>>
> |>> |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
> |>> |>
> |>> |>You don't think their message was clear?
> |>>
> |>> More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other as
> |>proof.
> |>
> |>So there was no war with Japan?
>
> The question was, "When did the Japanese declare war on us?". You cited an
> act
> of war as a declaration of war, then tried to do the usual poo-shuffle to
> cover
> for your idiocy.
There is no cover for his idiocy.
In article <tDlLa.673$Zr2.121@no-spam>,
"nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> wrote:
> "Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
>
> > |>> |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
> > |>> |>> >>
> > |>> |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
> > |>> |>> >
> > |>> |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
> > |>> |>>
> > |>> |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
> > |>> |>
> > |>> |>You don't think their message was clear?
> > |>>
> > |>> More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other as
> > |>proof.
> > |>
> > |>So there was no war with Japan?
> >
> > The question was, "When did the Japanese declare war on us?".
>
> When they bombed your stolen base,
Wrong, try again.
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 01:38:17 GMT, nobody
<nobody@no-spam> wrote:
>In article <zAfLa.1937$sh4.253783@no-spam>,
> "nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> wrote:
>
>> "Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
>>
>> > |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
>> > |>> >>
>> > |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
>> > |>> >
>> > |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
>> > |>>
>> > |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
>> > |>
>> > |>You don't think their message was clear?
>> >
>> > More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other as
>> proof.
>>
>> So there was no war with Japan?
>
>
>Are you stupid? No, don't bother to answer that.
I don't think he's smart enough to give a meaningful answer.
---
"Okay Chrissy, you cock-sucking saucer-lipped booger-eating
monkey-fucking nigger, I hereby announce that I can say any word and
your cynical manipulation of my expression won't ever make me a racist
or a bigot. I don't give a fuck." - Lee Harrison (leehrsn@no-spam
"nobody" <nobody@no-spam> wrote in message
news:nobody-387DC7.21403428062003@no-spam
> In article <3cnrfv4tcvksoes5irdfqr6gp23b5a48v7@no-spam>,
> Little John <jammin1@no-spam> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:04:23 +0100, in a fit of unbridled digital
verbosity,
> > once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the
keyboard,
> > "nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
> >
> > |>
> > |>"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
> > |>
> > |>> |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
> > |>> |>> >>
> > |>> |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
> > |>> |>> >
> > |>> |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
> > |>> |>>
> > |>> |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
> > |>> |>
> > |>> |>You don't think their message was clear?
> > |>>
> > |>> More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other as
> > |>proof.
> > |>
> > |>So there was no war with Japan?
> >
> > The question was, "When did the Japanese declare war on us?". You cited
an
> > act
> > of war as a declaration of war, then tried to do the usual poo-shuffle
to
> > cover
> > for your idiocy.
>
> There is no cover for his idiocy.
nick, it may be time for you to change MOs. Everyone here seems to have you
down pat. Can you get one of those elderly orientals to post for you? They
couldn't do any worse than phuckhat, and you haven't had him mercifully
killed. Just a thought....
>
"Phxbrd" <phxbrd@no-spam> wrote in message
news:4pILa.18164$C83.1715981@no-spam
>
> "nobody" <nobody@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:nobody-387DC7.21403428062003@no-spam
> > In article <3cnrfv4tcvksoes5irdfqr6gp23b5a48v7@no-spam>,
> > Little John <jammin1@no-spam> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:04:23 +0100, in a fit of unbridled digital
> verbosity,
> > > once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the
> keyboard,
> > > "nick" <pizzalovingcriminals@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
> > >
> > > |>
> > > |>"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > |>
> > > |>> |>> >> >When did the Afghans and Iraqis declare war on you?
> > > |>> |>> >>
> > > |>> |>> >> When did the Japanese declare war on us?
> > > |>> |>> >
> > > |>> |>> >When they bombed your base on the stolen island of Hawaii.
> > > |>> |>>
> > > |>> |>> No declaration of war. Look it up.
> > > |>> |>
> > > |>> |>You don't think their message was clear?
> > > |>>
> > > |>> More of the poo-shuffle. Claim one extreme, then claim the other
as
> > > |>proof.
> > > |>
> > > |>So there was no war with Japan?
> > >
> > > The question was, "When did the Japanese declare war on us?". You
cited
> an
> > > act
> > > of war as a declaration of war, then tried to do the usual poo-shuffle
> to
> > > cover
> > > for your idiocy.
> >
> > There is no cover for his idiocy.
>
> nick, it may be time for you to change MOs. Everyone here seems to have
you
> down pat. Can you get one of those elderly orientals to post for you?
They
> couldn't do any worse than phuckhat, and you haven't had him mercifully
> killed.
You really are out for the count, Hammond.
> Just a thought....
Your are incapable of thought, girl.