AZ GENERAL 73 RE STUPID LESLIE SETH HAMMOND
From: Little John (jammin1@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Stupid Leslie Seth Hammond
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 19:52:37 -0700


On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:39:40 GMT, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity, once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard, "Phxbrd"

<phxbrd@no-spam> two-fingered to all:

|>
|>"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message |>news:ejc1gv8bj4g1e9mdpngl4a29degquc2q3b@no-spam |>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:41:51 GMT, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
|>once |>> again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
|>"Phxbrd"
|>> <phxbrd@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
|>>
|>> |>> |>> I'm all for it, but as long as we continue our nostalgic love of |>old |>> |>> |>machinery |>> |>> |>> (classic cars and such), we're going to need some oil.
|>> |>> |>
|>> |>> |>See Mobil 1
|>> |>>
|>> |>> Yes, I'm sure it'll burn like a champ when poured by the extremely |>> |>expensive |>> |>> gallon into the fuel tank.
|>> |>>
|>> |>> It'll also work wonders for sticking rocks together to form roadways.
|>> |>
|>> |>Any number of combustibles can readily replace gasoline,
|>>
|>> Like what? Alcohol? Have you tried running an older vehicle on alcohol?
|>Or, a |>> new one for that matter?
|>
|>We shouldn't subsidize buggywhip manufacturers, and we shouldn't resist |>change because we can't hang on to all of the old. Keep driving the |>anachronisms for as long as you want to pay extortionate operating costs,
|>it's up to you. Oil will still be around, and if we shift off to a few |>things like hydrogen, etc fast enough, oil prices could even go down.

Like I said, I'm all for alternatives, but keep some of the old stuff around too.

|>> |>and they already |>> |>have a functional replacement for asphalt. It's called 'concrete'.
|>>
|>> Which can't be patched on the fly, costs considerably more per mile,
|>etc...
|>
|>Our interstate highway system has been called the 8th wonder of the world.
|>Is it made of asphalt?

Been on I-40 lately?

|>> I guess we could pay tobacco farmers to grow more tobacco, then extract |>the tar |>> and use the rest to produce alcohol, cattle feed and pellets as |>replacements for |>> wood pellets in furnaces.
|>
|>Hemp
Hemp doesn't have enough tar. But, the proper varieties have equally interesting chemicals. ;-)

jammin1 at jammin1 dot com
If you ain't in bed by 11...Go home!


From: "Phxbrd" (phxbrd@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Stupid Leslie Seth Hammond
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 02:59:45 GMT

"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message news:rot1gv8kc3capah1k9762clrmemb34fbti@no-spam > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:39:40 GMT, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
once > again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
"Phxbrd"
> <phxbrd@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
>
> |>
> |>"Little John" <jammin1@no-spam> wrote in message > |>news:ejc1gv8bj4g1e9mdpngl4a29degquc2q3b@no-spam > |>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:41:51 GMT, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
> |>once > |>> again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
> |>"Phxbrd"
> |>> <phxbrd@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
> |>>
> |>> |>> |>> I'm all for it, but as long as we continue our nostalgic love of > |>old > |>> |>> |>machinery > |>> |>> |>> (classic cars and such), we're going to need some oil.
> |>> |>> |>
> |>> |>> |>See Mobil 1
> |>> |>>
> |>> |>> Yes, I'm sure it'll burn like a champ when poured by the extremely > |>> |>expensive > |>> |>> gallon into the fuel tank.
> |>> |>>
> |>> |>> It'll also work wonders for sticking rocks together to form roadways.
> |>> |>
> |>> |>Any number of combustibles can readily replace gasoline,
> |>>
> |>> Like what? Alcohol? Have you tried running an older vehicle on alcohol?
> |>Or, a > |>> new one for that matter?
> |>
> |>We shouldn't subsidize buggywhip manufacturers, and we shouldn't resist > |>change because we can't hang on to all of the old. Keep driving the > |>anachronisms for as long as you want to pay extortionate operating costs,
> |>it's up to you. Oil will still be around, and if we shift off to a few > |>things like hydrogen, etc fast enough, oil prices could even go down.
>
> Like I said, I'm all for alternatives, but keep some of the old stuff around > too.
>
> |>> |>and they already > |>> |>have a functional replacement for asphalt. It's called 'concrete'.
> |>>
> |>> Which can't be patched on the fly, costs considerably more per mile,
> |>etc...
> |>
> |>Our interstate highway system has been called the 8th wonder of the world.
> |>Is it made of asphalt?
>
> Been on I-40 lately?
>
> |>> I guess we could pay tobacco farmers to grow more tobacco, then extract > |>the tar > |>> and use the rest to produce alcohol, cattle feed and pellets as > |>replacements for > |>> wood pellets in furnaces.
> |>
> |>Hemp >
> Hemp doesn't have enough tar. But, the proper varieties have equally > interesting chemicals. ;-)

Not enough tar? Have you ever cleaned a... , nevermind then - forget it....