AZ GENERAL 80 RE STUPID LESLIE SETH HAMMOND
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 12:49:53 GMT

From: Angkor (void@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Stupid Leslie Seth Hammond

On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 05:27:01 -0700, Little John <jammin1@no-spam> wrote:

>On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 02:59:45 GMT, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity, once
>again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard, "Phxbrd"

><phxbrd@no-spam> two-fingered to all:
>
>|>> |>> I guess we could pay tobacco farmers to grow more tobacco, then >|>extract >|>> |>the tar >|>> |>> and use the rest to produce alcohol, cattle feed and pellets as >|>> |>replacements for >|>> |>> wood pellets in furnaces.
>|>> |>
>|>> |>Hemp >|>>
>|>> Hemp doesn't have enough tar. But, the proper varieties have equally >|>> interesting chemicals. ;-)
>|>
>|>Not enough tar? Have you ever cleaned a... , nevermind then - forget >|>it....
>
>Yes, I've cleaned a nevermind then. :-) >
>As a student assistant for the chemistry lab in high school, I used to make them
>too. All that great glass tubing laying around, just begging to be heated, bent
>and shaped made it something of a necessity. Some tubing, a flask and a tube >vented rubber cork made for quite the interesting little device. By years end,

>there were several dozen sitting on shelves and in closets among the student >population.
>
how fascinating ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
--
"Ken Ehrett was a sock"
Sable washes her dirty laundry in public in message <18623a1b000ce9180a7290769e4a6775@no-spam>