NZ GENERAL 14 RE REDBAITER THREATENS ABUSE OF USENET
From: Mainlander (*@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Redbaiter Threatens Abuse of Usenet
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 08:56:39 +1200


In article <3f01eebc@no-spam>, don't@no-spam says...
> Steve says...
> > Redbaiter allegedly said:
> > > > > Steve says...
> > >> rag allegedly said:
> > >> > > >> > Communist propaganda, isn't history.
> > >> > > > >> > rag > > >> > > >> You know so little history, I'm surprised you dare offer comment. Where > > >> did you avoid getting an education?
> > >> > > > Why do you need to change the thread to a personal attack thread > > > Withers, you usenet abuser..???
> > > > The subject name reflects the shift in focus of the discussion. Thisshould > > be clear to any with a bit of sense. > > > > I'm glad to see that this bothers you. I'll have to do more of it. > > > > > You are an idiot to make such a stupid threat. Do you want all of > your thread titles changed as well? You abusers need to realise > this is a free speech outlet. You have no right or need to > interfere with others who like you, are merely posting messages.

You have no right to tell other people how to post in this forum, you Nazi.

> I suggest this forum would work so much better without the hate > driven behaviour of you and your ilk. You, Darren Smith, Jason > Mamford are not interested in discussion so much as you are in > sabotaging discussion.

Other pepple get on fine. This is not your newsgroup, if you want one of your own set up alt.redbaiter, I'm sure you'll love it.


From: H3r3 and n0w (time@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Redbaiter Threatens Abuse of Usenet
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:28:40 +1200

On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 08:56:39 +1200, Mainlander wrote:

> Other pepple get on fine. This is not your newsgroup, if you want one of > your own set up alt.redbaiter, I'm sure you'll love it.

Only if he had a cast of thousands abusing him - which is what he now has since he went global.
The funny part is, he's trying to tell me I can't choose my own Subject line for my own posts.
A true idiot.

From: nobody@no-spam
Subject: Re: Redbaiter Threatens Abuse of Usenet
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:23:27 -0500

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:28:40 +1200, H3r3 and n0w <time@no-spam>
wrote:

>On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 08:56:39 +1200, Mainlander wrote:
>
>> Other pepple get on fine. This is not your newsgroup, if you want one of >> your own set up alt.redbaiter, I'm sure you'll love it.
>
>Only if he had a cast of thousands abusing him - which is what he now has >since he went global. >
>The funny part is, he's trying to tell me I can't choose my own Subject >line for my own posts. >
>A true idiot.
Are you sure your not Steve?

Posting from the same isp - co-incidence??

Cath

From: Brian Dooley (brian-d@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Redbaiter Threatens Abuse of Usenet
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:54:35 +1300

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:23:27 -0500, nobody@no-spam wrote:

>On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:28:40 +1200, H3r3 and n0w <time@no-spam>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 08:56:39 +1200, Mainlander wrote:
>>
>>> Other pepple get on fine. This is not your newsgroup, if you want one of >>> your own set up alt.redbaiter, I'm sure you'll love it.
>>
>>Only if he had a cast of thousands abusing him - which is what he now has >>since he went global. >>
>>The funny part is, he's trying to tell me I can't choose my own Subject >>line for my own posts. >>
>>A true idiot. >
>
>Are you sure your not Steve?
>
>Posting from the same isp - co-incidence??

Must be - so do I.

--
Brian Dooley
Wellington New Zealand

From: R Kym Horsell (root@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Redbaiter Threatens Abuse of Usenet
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 05:51:56 GMT

In aus.politics H3r3 and n0w <time@no-spam> wrote:
[...]
> The funny part is, he's trying to tell me I can't choose my own Subject > line for my own posts. [...]

Readers of AUS.POLITICS are familiar with that kind of example. ;-)

A funny thing happened while I was perusing through my various end-of-month stats for AUS.POL.

While I in no way assert that the 2 posting ID's are the same,
there is a remarkable 1 in 1,000,000 co-incidence between Redbaiter and another poster familer to many this side of the Tasman.

Postings by LOCAL hour-of-day:

PERSON XXX REDBAITER 00 78 ******* 00 87 ********
01 52 ***** 01 104 **********
02 49 **** 02 87 ********
03 32 *** 03 55 *****
04 26 ** 04 40 ****
05 48 **** 05 23 **
06 77 ******* 06 32 ******
07 208 ******************** 07 87 ********
08 310 ********************* 08 162 ****************
09 317 ********************* 09 167 ****************
10 243 ********************* 10 204 ********************
11 224 ********************* 11 217 *********************
12 195 ******************* 12 163 ****************
13 142 ************** 13 206 ********************
14 166 **************** 14 180 ******************
15 156 *************** 15 101 **********
16 91 ********* 16 157 ***************
17 138 ************* 17 152 ***************
18 107 ********** 18 84 ********
19 115 *********** 19 73 *******
20 119 *********** 20 84 ********
21 119 *********** 21 84 ********
22 106 ********** 22 131 *************
23 117 *********** 23 90 *********

While these 2 are ostensibly in different time zones, the feature of the 5 am minimum is an extra-ordinary co-incidence.
I have similar graphs for posts made to AUS.POL over the past 5 y,
and there are no others that come this close in about 3,000
identifiable posters to the group.

As I say -- getting well into the 1 chance in 1,000,000 co-incidence.

Here's another co-incidence.

Both Redbaiter and Person XXX mention {lefists,socialists,marxists}
almost exactly 50% more often than various synonyms for "President Bush".

But this is not as rare as the hourly profile. There is another posting ID from the 3,000 that also mentions marxists 50% more often than the US president.

Luckily all these details are gathered automatically. I'd get a headache if I had to crunch the numbers every time I started a newsreader. ;-)

==============================================================================
$ Marxist think they invented and own socialism -- Mosley hiding out as DemSoc, 20 Jan 2003