In article <begcla$qdi$1@no-spam>, nzdude@no-spam
says...
>
> "Redbaiter" <don't@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f0bb56f@no-spam
> >
> > --
> > Redbaiter
> > In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
>
> Add on to that Labour's desire that the ratepayers foot the bill for the new
> government electricity commision, when they put their hands in all powerbill
> payers pockets for an additional $40 to help pay for their commision.
>
> At least now we know where all that surplus they keep bragging about is
> going.
Which surplus? Cullen's phantom $4 billion, or the real surplus of less
than $2 billion?
In article <begcla$qdi$1@no-spam>, "NZDude" <nzdude@no-spam> wrote:
>
>"Redbaiter" <don't@no-spam> wrote in message
>news:3f0bb56f@no-spam
>>
>> --
>> Redbaiter
>> In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
>
>Add on to that Labour's desire that the ratepayers foot the bill for the new
>government electricity commision, when they put their hands in all powerbill
>payers pockets for an additional $40 to help pay for their commision.
>
>At least now we know where all that surplus they keep bragging about is
>going.
who is this klark ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Oook !
NOTE remove the not_ from the address to reply. NO SPAM !
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 20:34:32 GMT
"NZDude" <nzdude@no-spam> wrote:
>
>"Mainlander" <*@no-spam> wrote in message
>news:MPG.1976b1173f56aaa998994b@no-spam
>> In article <begcla$qdi$1@no-spam>, nzdude@no-spam
>> says...
>> >
>> > "Redbaiter" <don't@no-spam> wrote in message
>> > news:3f0bb56f@no-spam
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Redbaiter
>> > > In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
>> >
>> > Add on to that Labour's desire that the ratepayers foot the bill for the
>new
>> > government electricity commision, when they put their hands in all
>powerbill
>> > payers pockets for an additional $40 to help pay for their commision.
>> >
>> > At least now we know where all that surplus they keep bragging about is
>> > going.
>>
>> Which surplus? Cullen's phantom $4 billion, or the real surplus of less
>> than $2 billion?
>
>Take your choice. Either is the by-product of tax dollars which are meant
>to be used for the public good not simply hoarded so the present government
>can make "bogus" claims about having generated a surplus.
>NZD
>
>
Most likely horded away for next years big "Mother of all election
bribes" budget