John Sefton wrote:
> "Redbaiter" <don't@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f00136f@no-spam
>
>>"John Sefton" <js64@no-spam> wrote in message
>>news:bdohrt$lau$1@no-spam
>>
>>>Correct. Depleted uranium has run out of the bulk of its radiactivity.
>
> It
>
>>is
>>
>>>therefore effectively harmless, from the radioactivity standpoint.
>>>
>>
>>You must work for the military to believe that.
>
>
> No, I just remember my basic high-school physics: If depleted uranium has a
> half-life of billions of years, then its radioactivity output must be so low
> as to be negligible. IIRC, in Kosovo the background radiation of the
> country-rock was higher than that put out by the depleted uranium shells.
>
>
John, I strongly advise not to engage in conversation with this
nick-stealing, cross-posting spamming scumbag. A simple "fuck off Nazi"
or similar should suffice.