In article <bN_Ja.271895$3C2.7893225@no-spam>,
"Reason" <peterJ@no-spam> wrote:
>Kyoto has never been about fixing a problem, it's always been about: "Lets
>throw gobs of money at the problem, just so we look good, even though it
>won't change a thing."
You are incorrect. You will be sterilized...
>
>The Clinton administration found that ratifying Kyoto would throw millions
>of Americans out of work,
Liar.
>cripple the economy,
Liar.
>and mitigate greenhouse gases
>in the atmosphere by a tiny fraction of one percent in the long term, which
>amounts to nothing at all in a practical sense.
Prove it -- citation?
>
>By the same logic, you would spend a large portion of your income to install
>a giant air filter in your front yard to try to clean up the air in your
>neighborhood. Quite daft, and it would likely get you a visit from mental
>health authorities.
>
>
In article <dXJSa.473010$ro6.11399792@no-spam>,
"Terry Pearson" <rtpt_2000@no-spam> wrote:
>Ian St Jihad has the inside scope from the highest
>form of intelligence on the CBC
>
>That Being David Suzuki. It's part of Canada's
>leftist cult
>
OK, even Google can't translate that.
"Greg Macdonald" <mr_mac_daddy45@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f1c42dd.23372598@no-spam
> On 21 Jul 2003 18:06:07 GMT, lparker@no-spam (Lloyd Parker) used up
> some bandwidth to say:
>
> >In article <dXJSa.473010$ro6.11399792@no-spam>,
> > "Terry Pearson" <rtpt_2000@no-spam> wrote:
> >>Ian St Jihad has the inside scope from the highest
> >>form of intelligence on the CBC
> >>
> >>That Being David Suzuki. It's part of Canada's
> >>leftist cult
> >>
> >
> >OK, even Google can't translate that.
>
> They haven't put up the Bullspittle-->English translator yet.
Then we get to translate your bullspittle?
Must be frustrating to you, not to be able to communicate in your own
language.
"Greg Macdonald" <mr_mac_daddy45@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f1c57d6.28741598@no-spam
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:25:33 -0400, "Ian St. John"
> <istjohn@no-spam> used up some bandwidth to say:
>
> >
> >"Greg Macdonald" <mr_mac_daddy45@no-spam> wrote in message
> >news:3f1c42dd.23372598@no-spam
> >> On 21 Jul 2003 18:06:07 GMT, lparker@no-spam (Lloyd Parker) used up
> >> some bandwidth to say:
> >>
> >> >In article <dXJSa.473010$ro6.11399792@no-spam>,
> >> > "Terry Pearson" <rtpt_2000@no-spam> wrote:
> >> >>Ian St Jihad has the inside scope from the highest
> >> >>form of intelligence on the CBC
> >> >>
> >> >>That Being David Suzuki. It's part of Canada's
> >> >>leftist cult
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >OK, even Google can't translate that.
> >>
> >> They haven't put up the Bullspittle-->English translator yet.
> >
> >Then we get to translate your bullspittle?
> >
> >Must be frustrating to you, not to be able to communicate in your own
> >language.
>
> I think you need to check the headers a little more carefully next
> time. Unless I have actually said something in the past to piss you
> off, which I doubt.
I would tend to doubt it too as you are not a prolific poster and I had no
guide to interpretation.
In any case <flame off> Apologies if I was too quick with my response.
P.S. Headers are not relevant unless I am looking for clues as to your
location or affiliation. The flow of the thread was to Lloyd who indicated
trouble trying to interpret the prior post.
So which part of the message were you calling bullspittle? Lloyds comment to
which you were replying? Or the previous post?
I can't find anything flattering in this thread.. not that I expected to,
but your response seems to indicate that I may have made a
misinterpretation.
Terries comments are too mindless to be called bullspittle in my book. Bull
is usually associated with lying and falsity, while his comments are in no
way sufficiently intelligent to be lies.
And they don't need translation... just disposal as toxic waste ;-)