The Radwanski affair is not going to go away quickly
and no doubt will be an issue in the next federal election
as it crystalizes the systemic corruption of the Ottawa Liberals.
Financial Post columnist Diane Francis in her June 26th column titled
"Radwanski leaves pile of bills, doubts" begins with a powerful
opening paragraph, "Disgraced privacy commissioner George Radwanski
financially succumbed this week to a bad case of Liberal Party Disease:
he ran out of other people's money".
What Francis says in the remainder of her essay should make most
hard-working, honest Canadians angry not so much at Radwanski,
(he was just exploiting the corrupt system) but the failures of the
Chretien-Martin Liberal government itself.
Radwanski got railroaded.
Erik Trammel <trammel@no-spam> wrote in message news:<3EFB0142.30406@no-spam>...
> The Radwanski affair is not going to go away quickly
> and no doubt will be an issue in the next federal election
> as it crystalizes the systemic corruption of the Ottawa Liberals.
>
> Financial Post columnist Diane Francis in her June 26th column titled
> "Radwanski leaves pile of bills, doubts" begins with a powerful
> opening paragraph, "Disgraced privacy commissioner George Radwanski
> financially succumbed this week to a bad case of Liberal Party Disease:
> he ran out of other people's money".
>
> What Francis says in the remainder of her essay should make most
> hard-working, honest Canadians angry not so much at Radwanski,
> (he was just exploiting the corrupt system) but the failures of the
> Chretien-Martin Liberal government itself.
"MikeE" <mike_estuary@no-spam> wrote in message
news:6306bba3.0306270409.6e4d0c1@no-spam
> Radwanski got railroaded.
The Canadian taxpayers got ripped off, and saw what happens when the federal
Liberals continue their tradition of
patronage.
There will be more patronage to come after their leadership convention and
Chretin starts his departure from the PMO.
This guy is a poster boy for the federal Liberal patronage system.
But in response to why all of the new patronage appointments, Chretien will
no doubt give the old federal Liberal Party
line: "It's tradition".
",Walt Strauss" <ws.hra@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3EFC58BC.9A00EC3F@no-spam
>
>
> Paul Keenleyside wrote:
>
> > "MikeE" <mike_estuary@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:6306bba3.0306270409.6e4d0c1@no-spam
> > > Radwanski got railroaded.
> >
> > The Canadian taxpayers got ripped off, and saw what happens when the
federal
> > Liberals continue their tradition of
> > patronage.
> >
> > There will be more patronage to come after their leadership convention
and
> > Chretin starts his departure from the PMO.
> >
> > This guy is a poster boy for the federal Liberal patronage system.
> >
> > But in response to why all of the new patronage appointments, Chretien
will
> > no doubt give the old federal Liberal Party
> > line: "It's tradition".
>
> It sure is funny!! There are thousands and thousands of real Canadian
"Heroes"
> who spent their whole lives in the service of Canada. Workers , soldiers,
> policemen, firemen, farmers cattlemen and so on.
>
> But who does the PM choose to go to senate but a pair of "bagmen"
You're right, it is "tradition" as Chretien says. Most Canadians say it's
"crap". If you look the appointments, most are from
friends of high ranking Ministers and people who have contributed to the
federal Liberal Party (and the Tories under Mulroney were no better). Plus
federal Liberal hasbeens and oncewases.
As for the Senate, it should be elected, but again Chretien says it is
tradition within the Westminister parliamentary system that the Senate be an
appointed body. However Australia has had an elected Senate for decades and
still manages to be run under
the Westminister parliamentary system. If those Seators think they do
anything useful for Canada, have them prove it by facing the electorate.
But watch the red Liberal patronage wave to roll across the country after
the federal Liberal Leadership convention and especially in January of next
year when Chretien fills out appointment sheets. Not for his time
appointments, but for political
goodie appointments for Liberal hacks and money men.
I believe that the liberals were trying to get rid of him. Both sides
of the house were trying to get rid of him.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:20:48 GMT, Erik Trammel <trammel@no-spam>
wrote:
#The Radwanski affair is not going to go away quickly
#and no doubt will be an issue in the next federal election
#as it crystalizes the systemic corruption of the Ottawa Liberals.
#
#Financial Post columnist Diane Francis in her June 26th column titled
#"Radwanski leaves pile of bills, doubts" begins with a powerful
#opening paragraph, "Disgraced privacy commissioner George Radwanski
#financially succumbed this week to a bad case of Liberal Party
Disease:
#he ran out of other people's money".
#
#What Francis says in the remainder of her essay should make most
#hard-working, honest Canadians angry not so much at Radwanski,
#(he was just exploiting the corrupt system) but the failures of the
#Chretien-Martin Liberal government itself.
"Erik Trammel" <trammel@no-spam> wrote
> her essay should make most
> hard-working, honest Canadians angry
Since you are neither honest nor hard-working, can I assume that you are not
angry either.
On 27 Jun 2003 05:09:37 -0700, mike_estuary@no-spam (MikeE) wrote:
>Radwanski got railroaded.
If you mean he didn't pay for his ticked, you're probably right.
>
>Erik Trammel <trammel@no-spam> wrote in message news:<3EFB0142.30406@no-spam>...
>> The Radwanski affair is not going to go away quickly
>> and no doubt will be an issue in the next federal election
>> as it crystalizes the systemic corruption of the Ottawa Liberals.
>>
>> Financial Post columnist Diane Francis in her June 26th column titled
>> "Radwanski leaves pile of bills, doubts" begins with a powerful
>> opening paragraph, "Disgraced privacy commissioner George Radwanski
>> financially succumbed this week to a bad case of Liberal Party Disease:
>> he ran out of other people's money".
>>
>> What Francis says in the remainder of her essay should make most
>> hard-working, honest Canadians angry not so much at Radwanski,
>> (he was just exploiting the corrupt system) but the failures of the
>> Chretien-Martin Liberal government itself.
Question to whomever is watching; How do I get this message off my board? I
can't "Mark as Read". Thank you.
"Paul Kneisel" <tallpaul@no-spam> wrote in message
news:hmjufvc90rhk5bb5u7m81kmrvpp9hhtm4j@no-spam
> Coming on top of Canadians getting JEWED out of $1,500 MILLIONS by the
> Bronfman Jews, do you think that come the next election, people will
> vote for anyone but Jews?
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:20:48 GMT, Erik Trammel <trammel@no-spam>
> wrote:
>
> >The Radwanski affair is not going to go away quickly
> >and no doubt will be an issue in the next federal election
> >as it crystalizes the systemic corruption of the Ottawa Liberals.
> >
> >Financial Post columnist Diane Francis in her June 26th column titled
> >"Radwanski leaves pile of bills, doubts" begins with a powerful
> >opening paragraph, "Disgraced privacy commissioner George Radwanski
> >financially succumbed this week to a bad case of Liberal Party Disease:
> >he ran out of other people's money".
> >
> >What Francis says in the remainder of her essay should make most
> >hard-working, honest Canadians angry not so much at Radwanski,
> >(he was just exploiting the corrupt system) but the failures of the
> >Chretien-Martin Liberal government itself.
>