Hi,
Currently I am using IE 5.5 and Outlook Express. Strongly considering =
switching to Opera. Planning on downloading the free version of Opera =
7.11 to try it out. Question is, when I decide to upgrade from the free =
version to the purchased version, do I have to re-download the whole =
program again, or do they just give me a key to turn the free version =
into a registered purchased version??
Thanks for you help.
John
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4923.2500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Currently I am using IE 5.5 and Outlook =
Express. Strongly considering switching to Opera. Planning =
on=20
downloading the free version of Opera 7.11 to try it out. Question =
is,=20
when I decide to upgrade from the free version to the purchased version, =
do I=20
have to re-download the whole program again, or do they just give me a =
key to=20
turn the free version into a registered purchased version??</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for you help.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>John</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
[forgot to ad followup to .offtopic, but it is there now, sorry]
In article <oprr2lg9gyhfwx79@no-spam>, Toman wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 23:55:13 +0300, Lauri Raittila <lauri@no-spam>
> wrote:
>
> > <OT rant about newsgroup behaviour>
> >
> > Second time today when I notice multible replies to post, that don't
> > answer the question - even though they might be helpful. This time both
> > sure knew the answer, they just didn't read post good enough to spot the
> > real question.
>
> Yes I did.
Why didn't you answer the question then? People should say things
directly in news, as someone will understand them wrong. (What if OP
hadn't downloaded Opera already - the first 2 posts wouldn't have helped
him, would they? - from his post: "Planning on downloading")
Other such thing, the OP said someone had critisized him, and that one
had bad grammar. I have bad grammar, but I can't think anything in my
post critisizing him (nor was I able to spot any spelling errors). So now
I'm not sure if he meaned me or someone replying him privately. Had he
said name, all would be happier, even the named in long run.
> hrm.. Sorry if I offended anyone.
You did not offend anyone. (I propably did, as I have been doing what I
ranted for myself - apologies for offending and posting non-thought
posts)
> I thought my answer was complementary to the one Arioch gave.
Yes, and mine was complementary to yours and Ariochs as they failed to
answer the question OP asked. As I said, I don't doubt they were
helpfull. And if I wouldn't have been sure you did know the answer, I
wouldn't have said anything. My point is that all of us could have said
all those things in one post.
But it has been annoing lately how often there is half thought replies to
pretty simple questions in this (.general) group. It can take 10 replies
untill someone finally answers.
--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
Saapi lähettää meiliä, jos aihe ei liity ryhmään, tai on yksityinen
tjsp., mutta älä lähetä samaa viestiä meilitse ja ryhmään.