OR POLITICS 20 RE THE UNITED NATIONS
From: nobody (nobody@no-spam)
Subject: Re: The United Nations
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 03:50:27 GMT


In article <1fxc0bz.90lxtd13s3e2yN%nojunk@no-spam>,
nojunk@no-spam (Mike Pearson <see .sig>) wrote:

> nobody <nobody@no-spam> wrote:
> > > > > You're the one who thought that Al Gore got a majority of the popular > > vote. > > Uh...he did; official federal government records show this.
Uh...he didn't try again.













From: Bill Shatzer (bshatzer@no-spam)
Subject: Re: The United Nations
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 22:25:49 -0700

On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Mike Pearson <see .sig> wrote:

> nobody <nobody@no-spam> wrote:

> > You're the one who thought that Al Gore got a majority of the popular > > vote.

> Uh...he did; official federal government records show this.

-snips-

> (This is from the U.S. National Archives & Records Administration)

> Gore: 50,996,582
> Bush: 50,456,062

Thus giving Gore a plurality but NOT a majority.

The defenders of our appointed president never tire of carping about this little detail.

Which doesn't obviate the fact that dubya was appointed and not elected.

Generally, we suppose that appointed presidents are mostly found in Botswanaland and similar African locales which decline to Just Count All The Votes.

Not so.

Peace and justice,


From: nobody (nobody@no-spam)
Subject: Re: The United Nations
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:32:12 GMT

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306292221450.5414-100000@no-spam>,
Bill Shatzer <bshatzer@no-spam> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Mike Pearson <see .sig> wrote:
> > > nobody <nobody@no-spam> wrote:
> > > > You're the one who thought that Al Gore got a majority of the popular > > > vote.
> > > Uh...he did; official federal government records show this.
> > -snips-
> > > (This is from the U.S. National Archives & Records Administration)
> > > Gore: 50,996,582
> > Bush: 50,456,062
> > Thus giving Gore a plurality but NOT a majority.
> > The defenders of our appointed president never tire of carping about this > little detail.
> > Which doesn't obviate the fact that dubya was appointed and not > elected.

Wrong again.


From: nobody (nobody@no-spam)
Subject: Re: The United Nations
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:32:12 GMT

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306292221450.5414-100000@no-spam>,
Bill Shatzer <bshatzer@no-spam> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Mike Pearson <see .sig> wrote:
> > > nobody <nobody@no-spam> wrote:
> > > > You're the one who thought that Al Gore got a majority of the popular > > > vote.
> > > Uh...he did; official federal government records show this.
> > -snips-
> > > (This is from the U.S. National Archives & Records Administration)
> > > Gore: 50,996,582
> > Bush: 50,456,062
> > Thus giving Gore a plurality but NOT a majority.
> > The defenders of our appointed president never tire of carping about this > little detail.
> > Which doesn't obviate the fact that dubya was appointed and not > elected.

Wrong again.


From: nobody (nobody@no-spam)
Subject: Re: The United Nations
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 02:12:29 GMT

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306292221450.5414-100000@no-spam>,
Bill Shatzer <bshatzer@no-spam> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Mike Pearson <see .sig> wrote:
> > > nobody <nobody@no-spam> wrote:
> > > > You're the one who thought that Al Gore got a majority of the popular > > > vote.
> > > Uh...he did; official federal government records show this.
> > -snips-
> > > (This is from the U.S. National Archives & Records Administration)
> > > Gore: 50,996,582
> > Bush: 50,456,062
> > Thus giving Gore a plurality but NOT a majority.
> > The defenders of our appointed president never tire of carping about this > little detail.
> > Which doesn't obviate the fact that dubya was appointed and not > elected.

Wrong again.