thevoice@no-spam wrote:
> look at the dates he gave for his explanation. before dna was introduced.
> give us examples like that from 1990 and and on.
>
DNA would only establish species and family ties. Carbon dating does not rely
on DNA once so ever.
Ramboyd
"Go USA! Go Israel!" wrote:
> >>Just following the bible. Something that shows Israels rebirth in
> May
> >>1948 can be calculated down to the month and year. See other thread
> >>from a while back.
> >Any number can be calculated after you have the answer. I can
> calculate
> >the winning 649 number the day after the draw.
>
> It's so obvious you haven't even looked at the article plus what I
> presented in that other thread. There exist 3 original copies of the
> Greek Sepuagent (translation of the Old Testament) that predate
> Christ.
>
> Now go do the homework, or are you afraid of what you might find could
> cramp your lifestyle? History written in advance = There is a God =
> whatever turns you off about Christianity is something you might want
> to reconsider embracing.
I read it, and it's crap! Kreskin is God!!
Ramboyd
"Go USA! Go Israel!" wrote:
>
> >>I don't answer to a man made church. My church is one of faith in
> >>Christ alone.
> >Nope, sorry, ruminant-boy, but you follow a man-made church. You
> quote a
> >man-written book and follow man-made rules. Baaa-aaa-aaa.
>
> The bible came to us from a collection of over 40 separate authors
> over many centuries, many of whom were not always aware of what the
> other had written, yet any serious student of the bible will tell you
> that it's all in sync. These authors were inspired by the Holy
> Spirit.
So you consider those who feel that the bible authors were not in sync
to be non-serious students?
<snip>
> Now do the 'homework'. Yes, you'll be taking the word of someone many
> centuries ago, but the fact that it can show Israel returned in May
> 1948, indicates divine inspiration.. which makes that "someone" God
> Himself.
Um, where does it say in the Bible that Israel will return in May 1948?
Kevin
"Go USA! Go Israel!" wrote:
>
> >>The 6K comes from a rough total of the geneologies in the bible.
> >Ahh yes, the glorious Bishop Usher.
> >Too bad anglican priests (IIRC) proved that date to be totally
> erroneous
> >in the 1800's
>
> Here's an interesting article that suggests the long life spans you
> get in the book of Genesis was not entirely impossible.
Age spans are irrelevant. The priests were presenting to the Royal
Geological Society, and they were discussing all the geological features
around that simply could not have formed rapidly.
<snip>
> >Paluxy? It was proven they were not human footprints, but modified
> >dinosaur prints.
> >http://members.aol.com/Paluxy2/mantrack.htm
>
> We really have no way of knowing know, given that rivers have "rights"
> and what's there has been eroded away to the point where it's too hard
> to tell.
Um, we do. The excavated the banks of the river to look at unmodified
footprints. The unmodified prints are definately not human.
For a history of the sham at Palux, see
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy/onheel.html
They are one of the most investigated frauds in the Creation/Evolution
debate.
>
> >Past about 200,000 years, when the Ice core dating gives out.
> >Note that tree ring dating stretches past 10,000 years, and there are
> >stalactites about 45 minutes drive from my house that have approx
> 15000
> >years worth of seasonal layers in them.
>
> All I can say about these big numbers is unless we have a time machine
> or someone living long enough to confirm this for us, I'm still very
> much open to the possibility of the earth being young.
So you are open to the possibility that God is being deliberately
deceptive?
>
> >>Just in case you were wondering, if Noah, took any on the ark, he'd
> >>probably have taken the eggs :)
> >I thought he took 2 of every kind.
>
> In some cases it was 7. Maybe he just took the babies. Apparently
> animals didn't become so ferocious until after the flood.
Someday calculate how much space 2 of every "kind" of creature would
require on the boat. Also give a definition of "kind" that does not have
evolution working in overdrive since the so-called flood. The numbers
are just completely impossible (unless the ark had a few
extra-dimensional spaces inside, with entrances in various portions of
the world).
Kevin