In article <oqbOa.17581$aD6.17248@no-spam>,
riccardo@no-spam (Ric) wrote:
> In article <look-3D534A.02574407072003@no-spam>, The Expatriate
> <look@no-spam> wrote:
> >In article <bbernardini-AF8266.16530606072003@no-spam>,
> > Brian Bernardini <bbernardini@no-spam> wrote:
> >
> >If not, then have the backbone to say so. That is, if dissention with
> >the liberal ranks is permitted. Liberals' failure to denounce such
> >scenarios as Manno's only proves that Santorum and I are right.
>
> I for one will speak up against incestous marriages. If these marriages
> produce any children, they will probably grow up to be republican.
If you guys had any evidence that such children grew up to be
_Democrats,_ you not only would make incestuous marriages legal, you
would encourage the practice and provide tax breaks for couples joining
in such unions.
"D.F. Manno" wrote:
> In article <look-8BBF72.22520711072003@no-spam>,
> The Expatriate <look@no-spam> wrote:
>
> > "D.F. Manno" <dommanno@no-spam> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't believe _anything_ the anti-abortion nuts have to say on the
> > > subject. They lie.
> >
> > So _that's_ how you rationalize your support of infanticide.
>
> See, that the first lie. I don't support infanticide, because the
> fetus is not an infant.
> --
> D.F. Manno
> dommanno@no-spam
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Benjamin Franklin)
So what is a fetus?? Jello with eyes?