PA POLITICS 39 RE DID ANYONE ELSE CATCH THIS
From: Jeremiah McAuliffe (alimhaq@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Did anyone else catch this?
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 15:54:14 -0400


On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 10:49:08 -0400, Rich Loether <rjl@no-spam> wrote:

> Making >nice with uncle John in bed may be without consent, and may be >wrong for that reason (not wishing to examine that facet of it >right now), but it's not violent.
An issue of sematics....

It is indeed "violent" if we understand that word in terms of the amount of damage or injury that is done.... the act causing the damage may not be loud or bloody or "violent" in the sense of how we use the world to rate movies, but the damage and injury done are such that it is indeed a form of violence done to the child. Think of rape.... the woman may passively endure, not fight back, but it is still an act of violence. Any genital behaviors with children (or other vulnerable groups) is by definition a violent act against them.

Think of the words related to violence-- i.e. to violate someone is a violant act......

Jeremiah McAuliffe alimhaq@no-spam http://speed.city-net.com/~alimhaq/mcauliffe/
Heavy Music http://www.ampcast.com/jeremiah