PDX GENERAL 39 WHITE HOUSE EDITED EPA REPORT PROOF
From: "gatt" (gatt@no-spam)
Subject: White House edited EPA report: PROOF
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 01:12:51 GMT


Here's the proof some of you wanted. Why'd they remove the stuff? Well,
they chose not to believe it and since the White House, what with all the research it's been doing, knows more than the EPA on environmental matters,
it looks like they just took the scissors to the report.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/06/19/tech/main559380.shtml
http://www.religiousconsultation.org/News_Tracker/EPA_report_leaves_out_data .htm
"The NYT reports that "the editing eliminated references to many studies concluding that warming is at least partly caused by rising concentrations of smokestack and tail-pipe emissions and could threaten health and ecosystems." http://www.youaresosmart.com/archives/000133.html
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/135103811_epaed27.ht ml
Many more references available.

-gatt

From: "M G" (gilhouse67nospam@no-spam)
Subject: Re: White House edited EPA report: PROOF
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 04:59:20 GMT

sweet!

"gatt" <gatt@no-spam> wrote in message news:nUoOa.20176$C43.7675@no-spam >
> Here's the proof some of you wanted. Why'd they remove the stuff? Well,
> they chose not to believe it and since the White House, what with all the > research it's been doing, knows more than the EPA on environmental matters,
> it looks like they just took the scissors to the report.
>
>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/06/19/tech/main559380.shtml >
>
http://www.religiousconsultation.org/News_Tracker/EPA_report_leaves_out_data > .htm >
> "The NYT reports that "the editing eliminated references to many studies > concluding that warming is at least partly caused by rising concentrations > of smokestack and tail-pipe emissions and could threaten health and > ecosystems." http://www.youaresosmart.com/archives/000133.html >
>
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/135103811_epaed27.ht > ml >
> Many more references available.
>
> -gatt >
>


From: "gatt" (gatt@no-spam)
Subject: Re: White House edited EPA report: PROOF
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 23:15:32 GMT

"cardboard" <cardboard@no-spam> wrote in message
> > Many more references available.
>
> Is this your first experience with political editing?
>
> The United Nations' report "Climate Change and the Financial Services > Industry" includes losses from Earthquakes as a natural consequent > of global warming." I guess you would be upset if the White House could > have edited that stuff out too.

WTF does that have to do with the FACT that the White House deleted the entire section of climate change out of the EPA report?! If Dubya knows so damned much about the environment, why bother with the EPA or scientific research at all?

-gatt