Sisyphus <kalinabears@no-spam> writes:
>
>You mean that someone would actually write \(0..127) and expect that to=20
>be an array of 128 scalar references ??
Yes. After all the other case is trivialy done with [0..127]
so you might as well get something different.
Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> Sisyphus <kalinabears@no-spam> writes:
>
>>You mean that someone would actually write \(0..127) and expect that to
>>be an array of 128 scalar references ??
>
>
> Yes. After all the other case is trivialy done with [0..127]
> so you might as well get something different.
>
And you can just as trivially create a reference with [@no-spam .... so
let's make \@no-spam be an array of references to the elements of @no-spam
Cheers,
Rob