In article <slrn3vsbgqq3n.97el.kybyrd@no-spam>, kybyrd@no-spam
(Karen Y Byrd) writes:
>On 09 Jul 2003 17:17:01 GMT, John H. Fisher <taxservice@no-spam>
>wrote:
>>In article <slrn3vsbgo4it.b485.kybyrd@no-spam>,
>kybyrd@no-spam
>>(Karen Y Byrd) writes:
>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 19:42:15 -0400, Art Clemons <artclemons@no-spam>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>> Even
>>>>Nixon would not have dared to grab a US citizen and hold that citizen
>>>>as a non-combatant indefinitely without judicial review. Believe me I
>>>>remember the Chicago 7 trial, and I note that the trial came about in
>>>>part because the Justice Dept got a pro-prosecution federal judge, who
>>>>ignored questions of evidence and Constitutional rights. That seems
>>>>like a major improvement compared to now.
>>>
>>>This presupposes that his actions wouldn't have been just as punitive
>>>if he had faced terrorist controlled jets crashing into the tallest
>>>buildings in NYC
>>>and their subsequent collape, another jet crashing and burning
>>>into the Pentagon. And yet another jet possibly destined for
>>>the Capital Bldg or White House, crashing and burning in western
>>>PA. He didn't face any of those
>>>challenges. How would he have behaved I wonder when he had
>>>things like enemies list from which sprang the entire Watergate
>>>debacle.
>>>
>>
>>Here are the thoughts of another, taken from another NG:
>>
>>"THE WHITE HOUSE
>>
>>Office of the Vice President For Immediate Release August 20, 1998
>
>I don't know how much time it took you to paste in this but, really,
>this is not what I was looking for.
>
>My point was about *Nixon* NOT Clinton.
>
Much has been <snipped> but I thought you were criticizing Clinton's record.
I posted several pastes trying to give you a picture of the positive actions
Clinton took to ward off terrorism and the dropping of the ball by the
current mis-ministration!!=:)
"Jack" - John H. Fisher - TaxService@no-spam
Philadelphia, Pa - Atlantic City, NJ - West Wildwood, NJ
My Newsgroups & Boards at: http://members.aol.com/TaxService/index.html
Where Ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise!=:)