Mischa Gelman wrote:
> I'd gladly take the moral, faith-based foreign policy of William Jennings Bryan,
> Jimmy Carter and Andrew Young,
Would that be the same Jimmy Carter who stood by one of the most
dictators in the mideast, The Shah of Iran, and proudly declared the
US's support and personal admiration for? The same Jimmy Carter who
actively supported The Sandinistas and their attempts to jail political
opponents, shut down opposition newspapers and actively participated in
efforts to undermine free elections that threatened them in Nicaragua?
Faith based, what a joke. Since when did communism become a faith?
Paul Galvanek - Ver. 4.0
In article <look-5E6812.11462207072003@no-spam>, look@no-spam says...
>This isn't a high school debate class. I don't have to prove an axiom.
>Few people these days deny the right of gay couples the right to sleep
>with whom they please, but I don't notice a big rush to defend
>incestuous couples.
That could be because nobody knows any. Can you say, "non-problem"?
>Society realizes it's taboo, and no one, with the
>exception of you, is willing to waste time and energy trying to prove
>incest is just another "lifestyle choice."
So what would you call someone who rails on and on about a
non-problem?
--
In Liberty,
Rich
Guns save lives - maybe yours.
--------------------
Rich Loether Snail Mail: University of Pittsburgh
EMail: rjl@no-spam Network Services
Voice: (412) 624-6429 600 Epsilon Drive
FAX: (412) 624-6436 Pittsburgh, PA 15238
Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207
finger for PGP 2.6.2 public key
Key Fingerprint 53 76 0B 73 DF 5C D9 14 D0 C3 68 20 DE 4F 60 C0