REC ANTIQUES 50 FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION
From: Joe Schell (joecoin@no-spam)
Subject: Fundamental Question
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 06:33:54 -0400


What's the difference between an antique and an antiquity?
-- Copper is as copper does.






















From: "jJim Horne" (jim@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Fundamental Question
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:37:21 +0100

Joe Schell wrote in message ...
>In article <bf1lst$jum$1@no-spam>, jim@no-spam >says...
>>
>> Joe Schell wrote in message ...
>> >What's the difference between an antique and an antiquity?
>> >--
>> >Copper is as copper does.
>>
>> >
>> Joe,
>> A thousand or so years.
>>
>> Jim ( economic use of keyb )
>> : )
>>
>>
>>
>Is ther a definitive cut off?
>--
>Copper is as copper does.
>
I dont think so, but stuff from 1000 A.D. and before would be an Antiquity, that is my opinion .
Cheers Jim ( Thin Air Antiques ) : )))


From: Joe Schell (joecoin@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Fundamental Question
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 07:19:02 -0400

In article <bf3290$kfp$1@no-spam>, jim@no-spam says...
> > Joe Schell wrote in message ...
> >In article <bf1lst$jum$1@no-spam>, jim@no-spam > >says...
> >>
> >> Joe Schell wrote in message ...
> >> >What's the difference between an antique and an antiquity?
> >> >--
> >> >Copper is as copper does.
> >>
> >> >
> >> Joe,
> >> A thousand or so years.
> >>
> >> Jim ( economic use of > keyb )
> >> : )
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >Is ther a definitive cut off?
> >--
> >Copper is as copper does.
> >
> I dont think so, but stuff from 1000 A.D. and before would be an > Antiquity, that is my opinion .
> Cheers > Jim ( Thin Air Antiques ) : )))
> > > So the oldest antique would be just under 1 thousand years old, and the newest antiquity would be (roughly) 1 thousand years old.
-- Copper is as copper does.


From: "jJim Horne" (jim@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Fundamental Question
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:35:47 +0100

Joe Schell wrote in message ...
>In article <bf3290$kfp$1@no-spam>, jim@no-spam >says...
>>
>> Joe Schell wrote in message ...
>> >In article <bf1lst$jum$1@no-spam>, jim@no-spam >> >says...
>> >>
>> >> Joe Schell wrote in message ...
>> >> >What's the difference between an antique and an antiquity?
>> >> >--
>> >> >Copper is as copper does.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> Joe,
>> >> A thousand or so years.
>> >>
>> >> Jim ( economic use of >> keyb )
>> >> : )
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >Is ther a definitive cut off?
>> >--
>> >Copper is as copper does.
>> >
>> I dont think so, but stuff from 1000 A.D. and before would be an >> Antiquity, that is my opinion .
>> Cheers >> Jim ( Thin Air Antiques )
: )))
>>
>>
>>
>So the oldest antique would be just under 1 thousand years old, and the >newest antiquity would be (roughly) 1 thousand years old.
>--
>Copper is as copper does.
>
Absolutely !!!


From: Joe Schell (joecoin@no-spam)
Subject: Re: Fundamental Question
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 20:36:52 -0400

In article <bf4cc0$d72$1@no-spam>, jim@no-spam says...
> > Joe Schell wrote in message ...
> >In article <bf3290$kfp$1@no-spam>, jim@no-spam > >says...
> >>
> >> Joe Schell wrote in message ...
> >> >In article <bf1lst$jum$1@no-spam>, jim@no-spam > >> >says...
> >> >>
> >> >> Joe Schell wrote in message ...
> >> >> >What's the difference between an antique and an antiquity?
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >Copper is as copper does.
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> Joe,
> >> >> A thousand or so years.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jim ( economic use of > >> keyb )
> >> >> : )
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >Is ther a definitive cut off?
> >> >--
> >> >Copper is as copper does.
> >> >
> >> I dont think so, but stuff from 1000 A.D. and before would be an > >> Antiquity, that is my opinion .
> >> Cheers > >> Jim ( Thin Air Antiques )
> : )))
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >So the oldest antique would be just under 1 thousand years old, and the > >newest antiquity would be (roughly) 1 thousand years old.
> >--
> >Copper is as copper does.
> >
> Absolutely !!!
> > > And in fifty years?
-- Copper is as copper does.